Habr•September 11, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Detecting Lateral Movement with Neural Networks Trained Solely on Synthetic Data

A researcher has demonstrated that neural networks trained exclusively on synthetic data can effectively detect lateral movement in real enterprise networks. The method relies on a compact 135-line configuration that defines an entire fictional corporate environment, including user accounts, machines, roles, and authentication histories. No real attack logs were used during training or threshold tuning.

The synthetic generator creates five classes of machines: ordinary workstations, high-traffic servers, newly added systems, compromised hosts, and hosts that are both new and compromised. This structure forces the model to learn the difference between legitimate novelty and attacker-driven novelty. Authentication events are produced deterministically from the configuration, yielding roughly 400,000 events in seconds on a laptop.

After training, the models were tested on the public Los Alamos National Laboratory Comprehensive Multi-Source Cyber-Security Events dataset containing 1.65 billion authentication records over 58 days. The red-team ground truth included 749 labeled events involving 104 compromised accounts and 301 destination machines, with 94 percent of activity originating from a single beachhead.

The best ensemble of six networks ranked 3.6 million hourly machine windows by suspicion. Sixteen of the 23 highest-ranked windows corresponded to actual red-team activity, leaving only seven false positives for analysts to review. A conventional count-based detector required 161,000 false positives to surface the same sixteenth attack.

The work also revealed a practical refinement loop: each false negative on real data pointed to a missing phenomenon in the synthetic world, which could be added with two additional configuration lines. The resulting models achieved AUC scores within the range reported by research groups that trained directly on labeled real-world data.

Related articles

AntiMalware•AI Security

Swordfish Security Raises Investment from VIM Investments to Advance AI Protection and Secure Development Tools

VIM Investments' Pre-IPO 2 fund has acquired a 42.152% minority stake in Swordfish Security, a group combining cybersecurity consulting with tool development. The capital will support expansion of products focused on AI system protection and secure software development practices. Swordfish Security operates through AppSec Solutions, which builds DevSecOps and AI Security offerings, and maintains the Swordfish SAIMM framework for assessing AI protection maturity. Company representatives confirmed the deal but did not disclose the transaction value. The investment aims to shorten development cycles from customer requests to product releases while introducing new AI defense scenarios. Swordfish Security reported 52% revenue growth to 2.1 billion rubles in 2025, partly attributed to rising customer demand for AI security measures.

Habr•AI Security

Eliezer Yudkowsky Explains Why Clever Human-Designed Schemes Fail at ASI Alignment

Eliezer Yudkowsky published the essay Cat-Belling Problems following debates at the ILIAD-2026 conference on mathematical AI safety. The piece uses the historical example of Michael Lorrey's proposed reactionless L-drive to illustrate why complex compensatory systems cannot violate conservation of momentum. Yudkowsky argues that any spreadsheet or design claiming net thrust from standard physics components must contain an accounting error because every individual interaction preserves momentum. He extends the analogy to proposals for solving superalignment of ASI, noting that hidden patented compensators or uninspectable calculations do not change the underlying mathematical impossibility. The essay contrasts superficial generalizations like the Law of White Swans with deep laws derived from Noether's theorem and quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman's encounters with perpetual motion machines of the third kind are cited to show how claims of new physics require experimental demonstration rather than unverified tables.

Habr•AI Security

Troubleshooting AI Bug Hunting: Seven Critical Mistakes That Destroy Report Validity

Two Russian researchers shared detailed lessons from six months of running AI agents on domestic bug bounty platforms. The presentation, originally delivered at OFFZONE, covers hallucinations, lack of validation, threat model misunderstandings, severity inflation, bloated reports, high token costs, and scope violations. Vladislav Bek and Daniil Shushakov describe practical fixes including tool-enabled agents, dual-agent verification, strict templates, and cascaded model architectures. They emphasize that AI must execute real commands in isolated environments rather than fabricate results. The speakers also address scaling on private events, handling model refusals, and the continued necessity of human final validation. Their checklist stresses business context, proven impact, and staying within program boundaries to produce accepted, high-value reports.

AntiMalware•AI Security

SOC Forum 2026 Reveals Full Program Featuring Chen Qiufan on AI Agents and Business Defense

Organizers of SOC Forum 2026 have published the complete agenda for the event scheduled for October 27-28 at Moscow's Lomonosov cluster. The central theme explores how generative AI is used by both attackers and defenders, including the risks when autonomous agents gain access to corporate systems. Over 170 speakers from more than 90 organizations will participate in more than 60 sessions and 82 technical reports selected from over 400 submissions. The first day focuses on business impact, regulation, economic effects of AI, liability for errors, and employee data sent to external models, with Chinese author Chen Qiufan delivering a keynote and joining a plenary discussion. The second day shifts to technical topics such as AI-powered attacks, code security, cloud environments, and autonomous agent protections including access rights, prompt attacks, and incident investigation. The AI & Cybersecurity track received 126 CFP submissions, 2.5 times more than the previous year. The forum is organized by GK Solar as part of Russian Cybersecurity Week.