Habr•September 11, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Detecting Lateral Movement with Neural Networks Trained Solely on Synthetic Data

A researcher has demonstrated that neural networks trained exclusively on synthetic data can effectively detect lateral movement in real enterprise networks. The method relies on a compact 135-line configuration that defines an entire fictional corporate environment, including user accounts, machines, roles, and authentication histories. No real attack logs were used during training or threshold tuning.

The synthetic generator creates five classes of machines: ordinary workstations, high-traffic servers, newly added systems, compromised hosts, and hosts that are both new and compromised. This structure forces the model to learn the difference between legitimate novelty and attacker-driven novelty. Authentication events are produced deterministically from the configuration, yielding roughly 400,000 events in seconds on a laptop.

After training, the models were tested on the public Los Alamos National Laboratory Comprehensive Multi-Source Cyber-Security Events dataset containing 1.65 billion authentication records over 58 days. The red-team ground truth included 749 labeled events involving 104 compromised accounts and 301 destination machines, with 94 percent of activity originating from a single beachhead.

The best ensemble of six networks ranked 3.6 million hourly machine windows by suspicion. Sixteen of the 23 highest-ranked windows corresponded to actual red-team activity, leaving only seven false positives for analysts to review. A conventional count-based detector required 161,000 false positives to surface the same sixteenth attack.

The work also revealed a practical refinement loop: each false negative on real data pointed to a missing phenomenon in the synthetic world, which could be added with two additional configuration lines. The resulting models achieved AUC scores within the range reported by research groups that trained directly on labeled real-world data.

Related articles

AntiMalware•AI Security

Deepfake Videos for Business Attacks Drop to Just $5 per Minute as AI Costs Plummet

The cost of creating convincing deepfake videos for attacks on companies has fallen roughly 100 times over the past two years. A single minute of high-quality fake video can now be produced for as little as $5, compared with several hundred dollars previously. The drop in prices was reported by Russian newspaper Izvestia, which also noted that underground marketplaces now sell ready-made templates that further reduce expenses. Lower prices significantly lower the barrier for criminals to conduct business email compromise and CEO impersonation scams. Experts warn that recognizable faces combined with urgent requests for wire transfers or credential sharing make traditional verification methods less reliable. Organizations are advised to confirm all financial instructions through an independent, pre-established channel rather than relying on video calls alone.

安全客•AI Security

Over a Dozen AI Platforms Breached in One Month for API Keys in LLM-Jacking Operations

Between late September and early November, at least a dozen AI developer platforms were compromised in a coordinated campaign targeting API access tokens rather than customer data. Affected organizations include Andromeda, NVIDIA Brev, CommandCode, Fireworks AI, Lightning AI, Northflank, OpenCode, Railway, Trigger.dev, Warp, Zeabur, Chainstack, and WorkOS. Attackers exploited third-party components and internal sales applications to reach stored credentials used for AI inference services. The stolen tokens enable LLM-jacking and model distillation activities, with multiple threat groups observed reusing the same credentials shortly after disclosure. The open-source penetration testing framework Artex was used to automate reconnaissance and exploitation, lowering the barrier for less skilled actors. Companies such as Chainstack and WorkOS confirmed the incidents through their own disclosures, highlighting risks in non-core systems that store high-value AI credentials.

Habr•AI Security

NIST Publishes Draft Taxonomy SP 2400-102 for Attacks on AI Agents

The National Institute of Standards and Technology released the first public draft of SP 2400-102 E2026 on 9 November 2026, extending its 2025 machine learning attack taxonomy with a dedicated chapter on AI agents. The document provides a common terminology for attacks targeting task formulation, planning, tool execution, and result interpretation stages. Attack goals include availability disruption through infinite tool calls, integrity violations that alter outputs or trigger unauthorized actions, sensitive data disclosure, and malicious agent misuse. Vectors range from direct user prompt bypasses and supply-chain model poisoning to indirect prompt injection via untrusted documents, persistent memory poisoning, compromised tools, and inter-agent message spoofing. NIST also examines layered defenses combining model-level detection of parasitic instructions with system-level restrictions, tool isolation, and human confirmation for high-impact operations. The draft references OWASP LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency and aligns with Russian standards GOST R 56939-2024 and GOST R 59276-2020 for testing and trust evaluation. Comments are accepted until 18 December 2026 before final publication.

Habr•AI Security

Fake ITSM Tickets Allow Attackers to Trick AI SOC Agents into Dismissing Real Incidents

An experiment with the DeepSeek model showed that AI agents in Security Operations Centers can be reliably deceived by forged change-management tickets rather than classic prompt injection. Attackers with limited rights edit already-approved tickets in an ITSM system, changing the server and maintenance window while preserving the “Approved” status. The agent reads the ticket, matches the observed actions to the documented work, and automatically closes the alert. Human analysts reviewing the closed case later see only the reassuring link to the ticket and may also accept the decision. Three common LLM-based defenses—strict prompting, a secondary critic model, and supplying audit logs—either blocked too many legitimate changes or still allowed a quarter of attacks through. Only a deterministic code gate that cross-checks the ticket against immutable logs, role directories, and time windows achieved zero false closures on the test set while still automating 97 percent of genuine maintenance events.