Habr•September 11, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Agent-Ops 0.4.0 Released: Methodology for Secure Human-AI Collaboration in IT Operations

Agent-Ops 0.4.0 introduces a structured methodology for collaboration between engineers and AI agents in IT operations and support. The project, founded by Sergey Zhitinsky of Git in Sky, has released its first public normative candidate on GitHub and GitVerse. Two additional companies have become maintainers after agreements reached at the IT Elements 2026 conference, making the effort a joint industry initiative rather than a single-company project.

The methodology responds to growing use of AI agents for log analysis, configuration drift detection, root-cause investigation, and change preparation. It highlights the gap between an agent convincingly explaining a problem and the safe execution of its recommendation. Key concerns include whether the agent used current data, confused environments, verified hypotheses, or received malicious instructions through processed inputs. Responsibility for infrastructure changes must remain with humans—service owners, managers, and engineers—because accountability cannot be shifted to a model.

Agent-Ops enforces a clear separation of roles. A deterministic collector gathers facts within approved boundaries and records provenance, timestamps, and completeness. The agent correlates facts, generates testable hypotheses, and proposes a plan. An authorized human reviews and approves or rejects the specific plan. A separate deterministic executor then applies only the approved actions after re-checking permissions and conditions. The agent has no direct path from its output to live system changes.

The process consists of eight steps: Intention, Evidence, Diagnostics, Plan, Approval, Controlled Change, Verification, and Lessons Learned. Each step maintains distinct records so that any final change can be traced back to its supporting data, decision, and verification. The principle “unknown ≠ OK” requires that unverified facts remain marked as unknown rather than assumed correct.

Three independent planes—data, governance and policies, and independent verification—must each be satisfied separately. The Guardian role performs independent checks on data freshness, rule compliance, and authorization. These checks can be automated for deterministic conditions, while the agent may assist only with semantic consistency. Technical capability, autonomy, and potential impact are treated as separate properties that cannot be collapsed into a single trust level for the AI.

Version 0.4.0 is published as a candidate for community review. It includes a white paper in Russian and English, a glossary, a standards map, and machine-readable schemas. The project invites engineers, architects, support managers, and service owners to contribute via pull requests, issues, or new operational scenarios.

Related articles

Securitylab•AI Security

AI Investigators in SOCs: Limits of Autonomy, Prompt Injection Risks, and the Cost of Over-Reliance

A February 2026 Vectra AI survey of 1,450 security professionals revealed that organizations receive nearly 3,000 daily attack alerts on average, with 63% left unprocessed and 71% of respondents delaying critical tasks at least two days a week. The article examines the push to deploy autonomous AI agents for investigations in Security Operations Centers, highlighting how such systems often fail when confronted with real-world disorder such as inconsistent server timestamps, unapproved software installations, and incomplete logging. It stresses strict limits on AI decision-making authority, especially for blocking systems or revoking access, and warns against treating model confidence scores as reliable error probabilities. Prompt injection attacks via malicious emails, logs, or documents are identified as a novel threat that can manipulate language models into ignoring attacks or leaking data. Research from Microsoft involving 167 analysts showed that false “safe” verdicts from AI increased missed threats by 29 percentage points. The piece concludes that independent human verification of AI-closed cases remains essential to avoid hidden risks behind empty alert queues.

Habr•AI Security

Developers Build 5KB Pure-JavaScript Headless Browser to Bypass DuckDuckGo AI Chat Anti-Bot System

A detailed technical analysis reveals how a minimal 5,408-byte obfuscated JavaScript payload delivered via the x-vqd-hash-1 HTTP header can be executed inside a fully synthetic browser environment written in pure JavaScript. The implementation replicates enough of the Chrome DOM, HTML5 parser, V8 engine fingerprints, and iframe behavior to solve DuckDuckGo’s rotating anti-bot challenges without using any real browser engine. The resulting Telegram bot, called headless-duckapi, streams responses from multiple free models including GPT-6-luna, Claude-haiku-4-5, and Mistral-small-2603 while also supporting image generation and vision tasks. Four distinct challenge variants were deobfuscated, exposing checks that range from native-code string detection and subclassed Array behavior to precise HTML5 parsing of malformed markup. The entire solution runs in serverless isolates with no external dependencies, maintaining a solved challenge token across restarts via SQLite.

AntiMalware•AI Security

Swordfish Security Raises Investment from VIM Investments to Advance AI Protection and Secure Development Tools

VIM Investments' Pre-IPO 2 fund has acquired a 42.152% minority stake in Swordfish Security, a group combining cybersecurity consulting with tool development. The capital will support expansion of products focused on AI system protection and secure software development practices. Swordfish Security operates through AppSec Solutions, which builds DevSecOps and AI Security offerings, and maintains the Swordfish SAIMM framework for assessing AI protection maturity. Company representatives confirmed the deal but did not disclose the transaction value. The investment aims to shorten development cycles from customer requests to product releases while introducing new AI defense scenarios. Swordfish Security reported 52% revenue growth to 2.1 billion rubles in 2025, partly attributed to rising customer demand for AI security measures.

Habr•AI Security

Eliezer Yudkowsky Explains Why Clever Human-Designed Schemes Fail at ASI Alignment

Eliezer Yudkowsky published the essay Cat-Belling Problems following debates at the ILIAD-2026 conference on mathematical AI safety. The piece uses the historical example of Michael Lorrey's proposed reactionless L-drive to illustrate why complex compensatory systems cannot violate conservation of momentum. Yudkowsky argues that any spreadsheet or design claiming net thrust from standard physics components must contain an accounting error because every individual interaction preserves momentum. He extends the analogy to proposals for solving superalignment of ASI, noting that hidden patented compensators or uninspectable calculations do not change the underlying mathematical impossibility. The essay contrasts superficial generalizations like the Law of White Swans with deep laws derived from Noether's theorem and quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman's encounters with perpetual motion machines of the third kind are cited to show how claims of new physics require experimental demonstration rather than unverified tables.