Habr•September 15, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Why Isolated Bank Scoring Fails to Prevent Counterparty Default: OSINT Case Study of a Scam Deal

A social entrepreneur operating as an individual entrepreneur (IE) signed a contract in October 2023 for the supply of complex IT equipment worth more than 600,000 rubles, of which 500,000 rubles came from a targeted state grant. The agreement required 100 percent prepayment.

Before transferring the funds, the entrepreneur checked the supplier, conditionally named AvtoTransSnab-90 LLC, through the compliance service of a major bank. The system assigned the counterparty a green marker indicating high reliability. The transaction was approved and payment was sent.

The supplier shipped goods worth only 15,000 rubles as cover, then ceased performance and effectively vanished. While the entrepreneur pursued court proceedings and attempted debt recovery through bailiffs, the Department of Investment Policy demanded return of the grant due to failure to achieve performance targets. To keep the business running, the entrepreneur had to purchase the remaining equipment at personal expense for another 485,000 rubles and repay the grant funds. The net loss for the micro-business reached almost one million rubles. Bailiffs and arbitration courts yielded no results in recovering unjust enrichment.

Four Critical Red Flags Missed by Automated Compliance

The bank algorithm evaluated the company in isolation and at a single point in time. On the query date, AvtoTransSnab-90 LLC was active, had no recent lawsuits, and no open enforcement proceedings. The robot checked formal checklists and approved the deal. Human analysis of the same public data immediately identified stop factors.

  • Industry mismatch: The name and primary OKVED code in EGRUL clearly indicated cargo transportation, yet the contract concerned IT equipment supply. A sudden change in operational profile without adding relevant activity codes is a classic risk marker.
  • Absence of financial reporting: The state information resource for accounting statements (GIR BO) showed the organization had not filed balance sheets for the three years preceding the transaction. Combined with a minimal charter capital of 10,000 rubles, this pointed to a typical dormant shell company.
  • Direct affiliation via FTS registry: The Transparent Business service revealed that a 49 percent co-owner of the supplier was also the 100 percent owner of Computer Campaign LLC, registered at the same address. The second company was an actual IT wholesaler.
  • Financial distress of the linked entity: At the time of the deal, Computer Campaign LLC was effectively bankrupt, with tax debts exceeding one million rubles, arbitration claims over five million rubles, and negative net assets of 248,000 rubles.

The beneficial owner had redirected incoming client payments to the clean transport entity to avoid imminent account seizures on the profile IT company.

Two years later, AvtoTransSnab-90 LLC was liquidated by tax authorities as an inactive entity and the debt was written off. The sister IT company was declared bankrupt under a simplified procedure for an absent debtor with budget liabilities exceeding seven million rubles. The beneficial owner was added to the FTS blacklist and disqualified for three years.

The core vulnerability of commercial bank scoring remains its single-entity approach. Automated systems assess a legal entity in a vacuum and ignore the collapse of related businesses owned by the same beneficiary. Basic manual checks against official state databases continue to outperform closed bank compliance algorithms.

Related articles

AntiMalware•Fraud & Social Engineering

Scammers Abuse Google Looker Studio to Send Fraudulent Compensation Emails

Kaspersky researchers have identified a new wave of Russian-language phishing emails distributed through the legitimate Google Looker Studio service, formerly known as Google Data Studio. The messages promise compensation payments or confirm supposedly approved money transfers from financial institutions, using the platform’s scheduled report delivery feature to reach victims. Emails arrive from a genuine Google address and carry the official Data Studio branding, making them harder for security tools to block. Recipients are directed to open documents in Google Presentations or forms in Google Forms that reference fake legal changes and display state symbols before leading to scam sites. The campaign is limited to messages sent at the start or middle of each hour due to scheduling constraints in the service. Experts note that the abuse of trusted platforms increases the difficulty of automated detection and filtering.

Habr•Fraud & Social Engineering

Human-like Cursor Movements: Evading Behavioral Anti-Fraud Detection in Browser Automation

Anti-detect browser provider Aurorium explains how modern anti-fraud systems analyze mouse telemetry including coordinates, timestamps, velocity profiles, acceleration, curvature, and USB polling intervals to distinguish humans from automated scripts. Standard straight-line movements at constant speed with perfect center clicks trigger immediate alerts because they lack natural human motor patterns described by Fitts's law. The article details four key techniques to simulate realistic behavior: cubic Bezier curves with random control points for organic arcs, phased acceleration and deceleration with occasional overshoot, low-amplitude Gaussian jitter that fades near targets, and offset clicks distributed around element centers. It also stresses that JavaScript click() calls set the isTrusted flag to false, making server-side mouse events via Playwright or Puppeteer mandatory. A complete Python implementation using Playwright's page.mouse API is provided, incorporating normal distribution sampling and smoothstep easing. The guide concludes that realistic mouse mechanics must be combined with clean residential proxies and consistent browser fingerprints to remain undetected.

Habr•Fraud & Social Engineering

Excerpt from Black Hat Rust Translation Details Chapter 9 on Phishing via WebAssembly and Social Engineering

A detailed excerpt from Chapter 9 of the Russian translation of Black Hat Rust has been published on Habr.com. The chapter focuses on phishing attacks that leverage WebAssembly when traditional technical vulnerabilities cannot be exploited due to lack of skills, team resources, or time. It explains social engineering principles based on Aristotle's Rhetoric, covering Ethos for building credibility, Pathos for creating emotional connections through storytelling, and Logos for logical justification of requests. The post emphasizes that human targets are often more vulnerable than infrastructure and that persuasion techniques have remained consistent for over 2000 years. The translator notes that code examples are preserved without modernization to serve as a lesson in verifying exploits independently, referencing common issues on platforms like Exploit-DB. The full chapter and previous translations are available in the associated GitHub repository.

安全客•Fraud & Social Engineering

Lost Control Series Highlights Realistic Social Engineering Attacks Disguised as Workplace Documents

A new micro-film in the Lost Control series demonstrates how employees can be tricked into compromising their organizations by opening files that appear to be routine work documents such as layoff lists, internal notices, or tax inspection alerts. The six-minute video recreates authentic attack vectors including phishing emails, fake download sites, bundled legitimate software packages, and phishing websites, as documented in five recent cases released by China's Ministry of Public Security Cyber Security Bureau. These attacks succeed because they mimic normal business communications rather than obvious malware delivery methods. The producers recommend sharing the film internally, reviewing work group messages from the past 30 days for suspicious attachments labeled as personnel lists or official notices, and verifying any such files before opening them. Organizations whose annual security training lacks measurable improvement in employee detection rates are invited to contact Allsec for assessment. Victims who have already clicked links or transferred funds are advised to call the national anti-fraud hotline 96110 immediately. The content is AI-generated with artistic modifications based on publicly reported incidents.