CrowdSec Confirms Theft of Source Code from Roughly 300 GitHub Repositories via TanStack Supply Chain Attack
French cybersecurity company CrowdSec has confirmed a significant source code leak affecting roughly 300 GitHub repositories, around 170 of which were private. The incident occurred in May 2026 but was only discovered on 16 September.
The attackers gained initial access through a supply chain compromise involving the TanStack library. A compromised component used by CrowdSec exfiltrated an API key that granted read access to the private code repositories.
The stolen code included the SaaS console, various AWS procedures, connectors, and automation tooling. More than 130 additional repositories contained open source code that was already publicly available.
CrowdSec stated that no customer data, usernames, passwords, or organization information was exposed. Investigators also found no tokens or secrets that could have enabled further movement within the infrastructure.
All potentially affected keys and credentials were rotated immediately after discovery. The company believes the stolen code would be difficult to weaponize outside its own environment because it is tightly coupled to internal data and tools, and a substantial portion of the components have changed over the past four months.
The SaaS service code undergoes regular security audits, and CrowdSec currently sees no direct threat from the exposure. The investigation remains ongoing, and the company continues to monitor for any suspicious activity.
Related articles
Dependency Confusion Attacks Let Attackers Hijack Internal Library Names in Corporate Builds
A widespread supply chain risk allows attackers to publish packages with internal company names on public registries such as npm and PyPI, causing build systems to pull malicious versions instead of internal ones. The attack works because package managers treat multiple registries as a single list and select the highest version number, with no inherent priority for internal sources. Researcher Alex Birsan demonstrated the technique in February 2021 by registering names harvested from open repositories and error messages, successfully injecting packages into builds at Microsoft, Apple, PayPal, Shopify, Netflix, Tesla and Uber. The malicious code executes during installation because setup scripts and lifecycle hooks run with the privileges of the build agent, exposing environment variables, tokens and internal network access. Mitigation requires a single internal proxy repository that never mixes public responses for internal package names, scoped namespaces bound to private registries, lock files with content hashes, and disabling install scripts where possible. The technique remains effective against any organization that lists both internal and public registries in its build configuration.
NEOMSA ESB Release Strengthens Supply Chain Security Through SBOM and Dependency Hardening
Neoflex has released a new version of its NEOMSA ESB integration platform with a primary focus on cleaning up the software bill of materials and eliminating critical and high-severity vulnerabilities. The team automated SBOM generation using CycloneDX, ran SCA scans with Grype and OWASP Dependency-Check, and performed SAST and secret scanning across all build pipelines. Instead of blindly updating to the latest versions, engineers applied minimal fixed versions for each advisory while handling complex cases involving transitive dependencies, locked files, and deprecated build tools. The effort reduced the total package count from 5,872 to 1,683 after migrating the frontend build to Vite in Camel Karavan 4.18. Remaining medium and low findings were tracked in DefectDojo with clear remediation timelines. The changes deliver measurable risk reduction for on-premise deployments in critical infrastructure and financial organizations.
CodeScoring Launches CodeScoring.Save Artifact Repository for Secure Enterprise Development
CodeScoring has introduced its own artifact storage solution called CodeScoring.Save, designed to handle packages, libraries, container images, and other software components used in development. The product targets corporate users of any size seeking a predictable and resilient repository that integrates security checks directly into storage and distribution workflows. Built in Go for modern Kubernetes environments, Save supports multiple package formats including Maven, npm, NuGet, PyPI, Go Modules, Docker/OCI, DEB, and RPM while providing proxy access to external repositories. It features role-based access, auditing, independent scaling of compute and storage layers, and native integration with CodeScoring.OSA to surface vulnerability data inside the repository itself. The company positions Save as a standalone local deployment option that can operate independently or alongside its existing OSA Proxy module to block malicious components at the repository level. Future plans include support for AI models as artifacts, starting with storage and distribution for ecosystems such as Hugging Face, along with certification for Russian secure development requirements.
WordPress to Automatically Block High-Risk Plugin Updates Before Distribution
WordPress is introducing an automated security screening process for every new plugin release before it reaches millions of sites through the WordPress.org API. Updates flagged with high risk will be blocked from automatic installation, giving developers time to address issues. Previously, only initial plugin submissions were reviewed, while subsequent versions could introduce vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious ownership changes without checks. Each release now undergoes a six-hour delay under the Protect The Shire initiative, where multiple AI models and Jetpack Scan analyze changes to produce a combined risk score. High-risk updates are withheld from auto-updates, and developers receive detailed reports. The system has already proven effective by catching a backdoor in a plugin with around 20,000 active installations on July 28, preventing distribution after Wordfence notification. Developers can fix problems and resubmit, or appeal results, though fixing is usually faster than manual review.