Russia Sets Tech Collection Fees: Smartphones from 250 Rubles, Laptops from 500 Rubles Starting December 2026
The Russian Minpromtorg has published draft rates for a new technological collection fee covering smartphones, laptops, and various telephone devices. The obligation to pay the fee starts on 1 December 2026, and the exact amount will depend on whether a specific model is recorded in the state marking information system.
Under the proposed regulation, the base rate for a laptop is set at 746 rubles. Registered models listed in the marking system will incur a reduced fee of 500 rubles, while unregistered devices will be charged 992 rubles. The same 33 percent discount and surcharge logic applies to smartphones: 373 rubles base, 250 rubles for registered models, and 496 rubles for unregistered units.
Lower rates are established for landline equipment. Corded telephones with wireless handsets will face fees ranging from 100 to 198 rubles, ordinary mobile phones from 50 to 100 rubles, and other telephone apparatus from 25 to 49 rubles. These figures correspond to base rates of 149, 75, and 37 rubles respectively, adjusted according to registration status.
The ministry calculated the rates using the median customs value of equipment imported in 2025 together with a projected inflation target of 4 percent. Although producers and importers are formally responsible for remitting the collection, analysts expect the costs to be passed on to end consumers through increased retail prices.
Related articles
How to Prepare Your Website for Data Center Outages: Business Resilience Checklist
Following strikes on Yandex data centers, many businesses discovered that their sites and all backups were stored in a single location, leading to complete outages. The article provides a detailed checklist to mitigate such risks by separating critical components across different providers. Key recommendations include moving DNS to an independent provider, lowering TTL values, maintaining a live mirror site on separate hosting, and isolating corporate email. Additional steps cover local backups, monitoring, access management, and CDN usage. The guidance differentiates between virtual hosting, VPS or dedicated servers, and website builders like Tilda, while emphasizing compliance with Russian data localization laws such as 152-FZ.
How to Properly Compare CDNs: TTFB, p95 Latency, Caching, DDoS Protection and True Pricing
Selecting a CDN based solely on the number of points of presence is as unreliable as choosing a car by dashboard buttons. Networks with dozens of global PoPs may underperform for audiences concentrated in Novosibirsk or Yekaterinburg, while smaller regional providers often deliver superior peering with Russian operators. The article evaluates CDNVideo, EdgeCenter, Curator, NGENIX and Yandex Cloud CDN across verifiable features, network design, caching behavior, security controls, operations and commercial models. Performance data is separated because marketing claims cannot substitute for independent measurements from services such as CDNMON. Emphasis is placed on p95 metrics, cache hit ratios, origin shielding, raw logs and API limits rather than marketing scores. The analysis shows that no single universal ranking exists; optimal choice depends on traffic profile, audience geography, security requirements and operational workflows.
Innostage Lab Benchmarks PT NGFW 1.10.3 Performance in Eight Load Scenarios
Innostage researchers conducted extensive performance testing of PT NGFW version 1.10.3, the certified release at the time of trials. The evaluation covered TCP connection setup rates, concurrent session capacity, and throughput on a custom EMIX traffic profile with varying security modules enabled. Tests used Cisco TRex generators and a high-rule-count policy of 100,000 entries to simulate realistic enterprise conditions. Results showed the device sustaining 700,000 CPS and 6.4 million concurrent connections, matching or approaching vendor claims under HA-cluster configuration. Throughput remained above 27 Gbps even with IPS, application control, antivirus, NAT, URL filtering, and logging active. The report highlights differences in test methodology compared with vendor figures, including packet sizes and clustering setup.
Java Card Tutorial: Implementing Supplementary Security Domain to Limit ISD Privileges
A detailed technical guide demonstrates how to create a Supplementary Security Domain (SSD) on Java Card platforms to isolate applet management from the Issuer Security Domain (ISD). The approach prevents full card compromise if ISD keys are exposed by restricting SSD privileges to specific functions such as accepting extradition only from the ISD. Using the FunGP library and SCP02 protocol, the tutorial walks through installation, personalization with encrypted keys, and extradition of applets under the new domain. GlobalPlatform specifications including GP CS v2.3 and GP CIC v2.0 are followed for install parameters, privileges, and STORE DATA commands. After personalization the SSD reaches the PERSONALIZED lifecycle state, allowing secure delegation of applet control while the ISD retains overall card management rights. The method eliminates the need for custom operating systems and provides a standards-compliant way to enforce least-privilege access on smart cards.