Habr•September 30, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

EASM Uncovers Forgotten Perimeter Assets Including 11-Year-Old Servers Invisible to Standard Scanners

EASM enables organizations to view their external attack surface through the eyes of an attacker and locate forgotten servers dating back 11 years. This chapter introduces External Attack Surface Management as a mature component of vulnerability management programs that was absent from earlier editions of the guide because the technology was considered exotic only a few years ago.

The core problem addressed by EASM is shadow IT located outside the organization on the publicly accessible perimeter. Typical large companies maintain a well-known and protected main website while simultaneously operating forgotten test servers deployed by contractors years earlier, legacy marketing subdomains running vulnerable CMS platforms, development-only API gateways, recently acquired subsidiary infrastructure, publicly readable cloud storage buckets, and VPN gateways with long-forgotten vulnerabilities.

Attackers continuously scan the internet and often possess greater knowledge of these assets than the organizations themselves. Verizon DBIR 2025 data shows attacks against edge devices and VPN infrastructure increased nearly eightfold in a single year, underscoring the risk posed by unmanaged external surfaces.

EASM differs fundamentally from conventional vulnerability scanners. Traditional scanners operate against a user-supplied list of IP addresses and domains, missing any assets unknown to the defender. In contrast, EASM begins with publicly available information about the organization and applies attacker-style reconnaissance techniques including DNS enumeration, Certificate Transparency analysis, and data from Shodan and Censys to build a comprehensive map of the external presence.

The process consists of four stages: discovery of assets through public sources, attribution and classification to correctly associate findings with the organization, vulnerability and misconfiguration detection with risk prioritization, and continuous monitoring because the attack surface changes constantly.

In practice, EASM regularly identifies abandoned test servers, exposed databases and RDP services, expired certificates, publicly accessible code repositories containing secrets, and outdated software on the perimeter. The technology has already located vulnerabilities that remained unpatched for six and eleven years in real environments.

Market leaders according to GigaOm Radar include Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse and CyCognito, while the first Gartner Magic Quadrant for Exposure Assessment Platforms named Qualys, Rapid7, and Tenable as leaders. In Russia, domestic solutions such as PT EASM from Positive Technologies, BI.ZONE EASM, PenOps from CyberOK, CICADA8, F6 Attack Surface Management, and ScanFactory have entered the registry of Russian software and are seeing adoption among regulated organizations.

Related articles

Security NEXT•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Multiple Vulnerabilities Found in nginx Web Server, Three Rated Critical by F5

F5 disclosed an out-of-band security advisory on October 14, 2026, revealing a total of 11 vulnerabilities across nginx and related products. Five issues affect the core open-source nginx server while six more impact associated offerings including NGINX Gateway Fabric and NGINX Ingress Controller. The flaws can lead to denial of service, remote code execution, authentication bypass, and sensitive information disclosure. Although the official nginx project rates all five core vulnerabilities as Medium severity, F5 assigns a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.2 to three of them, classifying them as Critical. One example is CVE-2026-15176, a heap buffer overflow in the ngx_http_core_module that triggers under specific URL rewrite and file-path configuration settings.

Security NEXT•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

CISA Adds BeyondTrust Remote Support and Fortinet Flaws to KEV Catalog Following Zero-Day Exploitation by ARMORY CASTLE

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has added two vulnerabilities affecting Fortinet and BeyondTrust products to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CVE-2026-102764 is an authentication bypass flaw in BeyondTrust Remote Support that allows remote attackers to manipulate appliance files without credentials due to insufficient source validation. BeyondTrust released an advisory on October 15, 2026, rating the issue 9.3 on CVSS v4.0 as Critical. Mandiant attributes the zero-day exploitation to the suspected Chinese group ARMORY CASTLE, which deployed web shells for persistence and privilege escalation in late August. The second CVE, CVE-2025-61624, also appears on the KEV list but lacks further public technical details in the current advisory. Organizations are urged to apply patches immediately to prevent further compromise.

Habr•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Use-After-Free in HTTP/2 Upload Leads to Potential RCE in curl: Detailed Analysis of CVE-2026-92392

In curl 8.23.0, developers fixed a high-severity Use-After-Free vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-92392 that could allow remote code execution during HTTP/2 uploads. The flaw stems from a dangling pointer left on an easy handle after a server resets an HTTP/2 stream, which later gets dereferenced when the multi handle closes. An attacker controlling the server can influence memory contents to hijack a function pointer and execute arbitrary code, though successful exploitation requires precise conditions including upload size, memory layout, and knowledge of the target architecture. The issue was discovered by Luna Tong at Anthropic using their OSS Scanner and reported to the curl security team on September 15. The team accelerated the release cycle by two weeks to deliver the fix while maintaining standard procedures. curl maintainers continue reducing internal handle pointers in favor of identifiers and are adding more tests and static analysis to prevent similar memory-safety errors. The vulnerability highlights ongoing risks in C-based networking code handling multiplexed protocols like HTTP/2.

Habr•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Automating Asset Scanning in MaxPatrol VM via API: Part 4 on Authentication

A detailed technical guide explains how to build asset scanning automation in MaxPatrol VM using its API, starting with authentication methods. The author covers three authorization options including local account login-password, domain account credentials, and reference tokens, providing working Python examples for local accounts. Code reads secrets from an .env file and obtains a Bearer token valid for 24 hours from the Core role instance. The post details required privileges in both the Management Console and MaxPatrol 10 for tasks such as vulnerability exports, dynamic asset group management, scan task creation, and report exporting. It credits Alexey Leonov for an early GitHub script that enabled practical API usage and lists additional resources including webinars, SDK, CLI, Jira integration, and a Postman collection. All subsequent API calls rely on the generated headers containing the Bearer token.