EASM Uncovers Forgotten Perimeter Assets Including 11-Year-Old Servers Invisible to Standard Scanners
EASM enables organizations to view their external attack surface through the eyes of an attacker and locate forgotten servers dating back 11 years. This chapter introduces External Attack Surface Management as a mature component of vulnerability management programs that was absent from earlier editions of the guide because the technology was considered exotic only a few years ago.
The core problem addressed by EASM is shadow IT located outside the organization on the publicly accessible perimeter. Typical large companies maintain a well-known and protected main website while simultaneously operating forgotten test servers deployed by contractors years earlier, legacy marketing subdomains running vulnerable CMS platforms, development-only API gateways, recently acquired subsidiary infrastructure, publicly readable cloud storage buckets, and VPN gateways with long-forgotten vulnerabilities.
Attackers continuously scan the internet and often possess greater knowledge of these assets than the organizations themselves. Verizon DBIR 2025 data shows attacks against edge devices and VPN infrastructure increased nearly eightfold in a single year, underscoring the risk posed by unmanaged external surfaces.
EASM differs fundamentally from conventional vulnerability scanners. Traditional scanners operate against a user-supplied list of IP addresses and domains, missing any assets unknown to the defender. In contrast, EASM begins with publicly available information about the organization and applies attacker-style reconnaissance techniques including DNS enumeration, Certificate Transparency analysis, and data from Shodan and Censys to build a comprehensive map of the external presence.
The process consists of four stages: discovery of assets through public sources, attribution and classification to correctly associate findings with the organization, vulnerability and misconfiguration detection with risk prioritization, and continuous monitoring because the attack surface changes constantly.
In practice, EASM regularly identifies abandoned test servers, exposed databases and RDP services, expired certificates, publicly accessible code repositories containing secrets, and outdated software on the perimeter. The technology has already located vulnerabilities that remained unpatched for six and eleven years in real environments.
Market leaders according to GigaOm Radar include Palo Alto Networks Cortex Xpanse and CyCognito, while the first Gartner Magic Quadrant for Exposure Assessment Platforms named Qualys, Rapid7, and Tenable as leaders. In Russia, domestic solutions such as PT EASM from Positive Technologies, BI.ZONE EASM, PenOps from CyberOK, CICADA8, F6 Attack Surface Management, and ScanFactory have entered the registry of Russian software and are seeing adoption among regulated organizations.
Related articles
Mozilla Releases Firefox 157 with 76 Security Fixes, Shifts to Individual CVE Reporting
Mozilla Foundation has released Firefox 157, addressing 76 vulnerabilities rated at various severity levels. The update also includes patches for the extended support releases Firefox ESR 153.4, ESR 140.17, and ESR 115.42. A key change in this release involves Mozilla's new approach to publishing security advisories, moving from grouping multiple memory safety issues under single CVEs to reporting them individually. Among the high-severity issues fixed are sandbox escape flaws, privilege escalation bugs, use-after-free errors, uninitialized memory problems, and JIT compiler mistakes affecting components such as DOM, Graphics, WebGPU, WebAssembly, and Networking. The ESR versions received 62, 43, and 31 fixes respectively, with 34 rated high in the latest branch. All listed CVEs range from CVE-2026-100756 through CVE-2026-100831.
Recon in Bug Bounty: Spotting Anomalies Instead of Chasing Known Vulnerability Patterns
The article explains that effective reconnaissance in Bug Bounty programs goes far beyond automated subdomain enumeration with tools like subfinder or httpx. It emphasizes building a mental model of the target application by analyzing policy documents, infrastructure changes via Censys and Shodan, and identifying behavioral anomalies rather than matching textbook vulnerability patterns. A detailed case study describes how a hidden legacy endpoint on ibm.com was discovered during passive and active reconnaissance, leading to the identification of a time-based Blind SQL Injection vulnerability confirmed with sqlmap. The author stresses that recon is a continuous process involving hypothesis testing, understanding service trust boundaries, and evaluating real security impact for triage teams. Practical advice includes reviewing HackerOne reports for context, maintaining motivation through interesting targets, and revisiting programs as infrastructure evolves. The piece also covers how JavaScript analysis and direct endpoint interaction help map authorization flows and weak links between microservices.
Google Releases Chrome Security Update Fixing 32 Vulnerabilities Including One Critical Flaw
Google has issued a security update for its Chrome browser that addresses a total of 32 vulnerabilities across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms. One vulnerability is rated Critical, while 25 are rated High, one Medium, and five Low. The Critical issue, tracked as CVE-2026-102331, is a buffer overflow in the ANGLE graphics component that was reported externally on August 24. High-severity fixes cover multiple type confusion and buffer overflow problems in the V8 JavaScript engine, use-after-free flaws in Bluetooth, Views, Passwords, FullScreen, and PictureInPicture, plus uninitialized resource handling in GPU and WebGPU. Additional High issues include out-of-bounds writes in GPU, out-of-bounds reads in WebGL, cross-site scripting in WebUI, UI display problems in Omnibox, and permission management weaknesses in Mojo. The update ships as Chrome 154.0.8037.93 and 154.0.8037.92 for Windows and macOS and 154.0.8037.92 for Linux, with gradual rollout over the coming days and weeks.
Automated Scans Exploit CVE-2026-39364 in Exposed Vite Dev Servers to Steal AWS and Azure Secrets
A large-scale automated campaign is actively scanning the internet for publicly exposed Vite development servers to exfiltrate sensitive files and cloud credentials. Attackers leverage CVE-2026-39364 to bypass server.fs.deny restrictions and read arbitrary files using crafted query parameters such as ?raw combined with ?import. The campaign has generated thousands of requests over several weeks, with telemetry from honeypots recording 807 sessions and roughly 32,000 events in a single month. Targets include .env files, terraform.tfstate, and other infrastructure-as-code artifacts that often contain AWS access keys and Microsoft Azure tokens. The vulnerable versions are Vite 7.1.0 through versions prior to 7.3.2 and Vite 8.x prior to 8.0.5. Part of the scanning traffic originates from Google Cloud IP ranges 34.x and 35.x. Organizations are urged to update immediately, restrict the dev server to localhost, and rotate any exposed cloud credentials.