Habr•October 2, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Enterprise-Grade Web Protection on a Budget: How Cloud WAF Lowers Barriers for SMBs

Reg.cloud has published a detailed guide explaining how cloud WAF solutions make enterprise-grade web application protection accessible to small and medium-sized businesses that lack dedicated security infrastructure.

According to data from Positive Technologies, 82% of Russian SMBs encountered cyber incidents over the past year, and 75% of successful web application attacks in 2025 resulted in operational disruption. Traditional WAF deployments require purchasing hardware or allocating servers, obtaining licenses, and maintaining the installation, creating high barriers for smaller teams.

Cloud WAF shifts these responsibilities to the provider. Organizations pay only for the service itself, either through subscription or usage-based pricing, while the provider handles infrastructure, updates, and scaling. Seven ready-made protection profiles are available for popular CMS platforms, API services, e-commerce flows, and media sites, allowing teams to start with baseline rules rather than building policies from scratch.

The article stresses that a dedicated security specialist is not always required. Tasks can be distributed between DevOps engineers and developers across three phases: preparation (gathering DNS records, origin server details, and rollback plans), connection (DNS redirection with initial audit mode to baseline legitimate traffic), and ongoing maintenance (reviewing logs, adding exceptions for false positives, and updating policies after application changes).

Key features include dual audit and blocking modes, detailed event logging with IP, payload, and rule information, rate limiting, bot filtering, and support for HTTP/HTTPS traffic inspection against SQL injection, XSS, and API abuse. A free testing tier currently allows protection of up to three applications at 50 requests per second.

The five-step onboarding process covers service activation, application registration, backend configuration, profile selection, and final DNS A-record change to route traffic through the cloud scrubbing center. The publication notes that WAF is not a complete solution and must be paired with vulnerability patching, access management, and separate defenses against volumetric DDoS or sophisticated bots.

Related articles

Habr•Other

30 Tools for Six Core Information Security Tasks: From Recon to Forensics

The article provides a practical guide for system administrators managing a single website, database, and server setup. It covers 30 specific tools across six categories: reconnaissance, web application testing, infrastructure scanning, incident response, digital forensics, and secure development practices. Each section recommends five tools with explanations of their use cases, such as discovering forgotten assets like test2 or analyzing network traffic during off-hours incidents. Tools include Subfinder for passive subdomain enumeration, Burp Suite for request inspection, Nmap for port scanning, Zeek for structured logging, Autopsy for disk image analysis, and Gitleaks for secret detection in Git history. The guide emphasizes proper documentation of assets, including ownership confirmation by colleagues like Lena, and highlights limitations such as VPN effects on scan results or TLS termination at load balancers. It concludes by stressing the value of maintaining accurate records to simplify future certificate renewals and incident handling.

AntiMalware•Other

UPS Battery Checks Trigger Minute-by-Minute Fluctuations in Global Power Grids

Power grids worldwide have exhibited synchronized frequency dips exactly once per minute for years, caused by simultaneous battery testing routines in large uninterruptible power supply installations. Researchers from Germany traced the phenomenon to UPS management software that initiates battery health checks on synchronized clocks, creating cumulative power spikes when thousands of units activate together. The team installed monitoring equipment across 80 locations at the Jülich research center and confirmed the characteristic one-minute rhythm wherever large battery systems operated. Detailed measurements on a single installation revealed a sharp consumption spike at the start of every minute. Although the oscillations do not yet threaten grid stability, they force hydroelectric turbines to repeatedly slow and accelerate, increasing mechanical wear. In Ireland the amplitude of the minute-scale signal grew fourfold between 2016 and 2021. The proposed mitigation is to desynchronize the checks by introducing random time offsets across devices.

Securitylab•Other

10 Services for Instant Video Meetings by Link Without Registration

The article reviews ten platforms designed for quick video calls that require minimal setup. Services such as Bitrix24 Sync and SaluteJazz stand out because they allow organizers and guests to join meetings without creating accounts. Other options like Yandex Telemost, VK Calls, Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Jitsi Meet, MTS Link, and Kontur.Talk offer varying levels of registration requirements, participant limits, and time restrictions on free plans. The comparison highlights differences in meeting duration, guest access policies, screen sharing, and integration with corporate tools. Practical advice is provided on testing connections, checking mobile support, and understanding technical limits that may affect long sessions. The review concludes that choosing the right service depends on team size, need for extended calls, and existing ecosystem preferences.

AntiMalware•Other

Heterogeneous IT Infrastructure Management Persists Among Russian Companies

A recent AM Live viewer poll revealed that 54% of participants manage their heterogeneous IT infrastructure only partially, with just 3% achieving unified control across multiple vendors. The discussion took place during the broadcast titled 'IT Ecosystems: Convenience, Savings, or Dependency?' and highlighted ongoing challenges in the Russian market amid import substitution efforts involving companies such as Orion Soft and Astra Group. 23% of respondents reported using separate platforms with independent management, while 16% relied on a single vendor's unified ecosystem. Key drivers for interest in unified platforms included automation needs (78%), cost reduction (64%), compatibility issues (61%), and specialist shortages (53%). Experts Sergey Rychikhin and Alexander Gavrilenko emphasized that true ecosystems require technological integration, consistent user experience, scalable architecture, and unified support rather than simple branding alignment. Recommendations included clearly defining integration requirements and exit conditions in contracts to mitigate vendor lock-in risks.