Russian Firms Accelerate Cybersecurity Strategy Adoption as Risk Reduction Emerges as Top Priority
Companies are increasingly developing information security strategies, yet they face growing obstacles from insufficient data and limited executive support. These findings emerged from viewer polls conducted during the AM Live broadcast titled “Information Security Strategy: Why It Is Needed and How to Defend It.”
During the discussion, experts examined how businesses should align security strategies with corporate objectives, define risk appetite and unacceptable events, distinguish a genuine strategy from a procurement list, and demonstrate value to leadership. Yaroslav Napalkov of MTS Bank shared a case in which presenting the strategy to top management provoked aggression and advised first establishing context. Nikolay Kazantsev of Securitm recommended that newcomers conduct “three cups of coffee” conversations with the CEO, IT teams, and other stakeholders.
Participants also addressed planning horizons of two to three years with annual updates, the role of backups and cyber drills, and practical cases involving ransomware, BYOD, DLP, and SOC construction. Over the past year the proportion of companies developing a strategy grew from 9% to 28%, while those with no plans at all declined from 26% to 21%. However, fewer organizations reached a fully operational document containing metrics and cyber exercises—16% versus 20% previously.
Barriers have also evolved. The share of respondents citing lack of исходных данных rose from 46% to 64%, and absence of top-management buy-in increased from 25% to 43%. Although personnel shortages remain the primary constraint, the figure eased to 59%. Nikolay Kazantsev noted that only 15–20% of security services maintain even a basic formalized risk register.
The leading objective for 2027—reducing risks and financial damage—was named by 78% of participants, a 23-percentage-point increase. Second place went to resilience and minimizing downtime of critical services at 57%. Natalya Glinina of Megafon Pro Business described this focus as logical because financial damage constitutes an unacceptable event that can halt business operations. Regulatory compliance stayed steady at 59%, while optimization of TCO and stack consolidation lost popularity, falling to 8% from 14%.
Related articles
Rostelecom Calls for 'Doomsday' Data Centers to Counter Drone Attacks and Infrastructure Risks
Rostelecom executive Valery Ermakov has urged Russian companies to build geographically distributed backup data centers, dubbed 'doomsday' facilities, to ensure service recovery after site losses. The recommendation follows drone strikes that disabled three Yandex data centers in Sasovo, Kaluga, and Vladimir, disrupting both internal services and Yandex Cloud clients. Ermakov explained that previous centralized infrastructure, built for economic efficiency, is no longer viable under changed threat models that now include physical attacks previously considered unthinkable. He advocated a micro-cellular architecture with services spread across many sites connected by high-speed links, while warning that Russian backbone networks are overloaded and much fiber optic infrastructure dates back 20-30 years. Rostelecom positioned its TEA NEXT line running from Kaliningrad to Mongolia as a source of additional capacity to address potential backbone shortages. Yandex responded to the incidents by accelerating client data migration to partner cloud providers.
VK Shares Rise 7.62% as Market Assesses Data Center Developments and Yandex Cloud Challenges
VK shares climbed sharply on October 12, reaching a peak increase of 7.62% to 134.2 rubles before moderating to a 6.6% gain at 132.95 rubles by evening. Analysts from Freedom Global linked the movement partly to the Ministry of Digital Development's announcement of joint measures with the Ministry of Defense to protect Russian data centers. Other observers at Finam suggested investors were pricing in potential client shifts from Yandex Cloud to competitors such as VK Cloud, which has already begun accelerated infrastructure placement for affected Yandex customers. The surge was also attributed to broader capital rotation away from the energy sector toward previously lagging technology stocks. While the confirmed price movement is clear, the exact drivers remain analytical interpretations rather than verified revenue impacts. The episode highlights how regulatory and infrastructure news can quickly influence valuations in the Russian cloud services market.
Passphrases vs. Leetspeak Passwords: Why Four Random Words Outperform P@ssw0rd!2026
The article explains why a passphrase made of four randomly selected words provides far greater resistance to offline attacks than a complex-looking password constructed with substitutions and appended symbols. It details how password strength is measured in bits of entropy rather than visual complexity, showing that four words drawn from a 50,000-word list yield approximately 62 bits while common leetspeak transformations add almost none. The piece contrasts fast legacy hashing with modern slow algorithms such as Argon2 and emphasizes the protective effect of per-password salting. It criticizes registration forms that reward predictable patterns and highlights NIST guidance favoring length over mandatory character rotation. The author recommends diceware-style generation for master passwords and password managers for everything else, noting that passkeys ultimately eliminate the need for memorizable secrets altogether.
Building the Foundation of Digital Trust: Why Identity Security Remains Undervalued
Identity Security is presented as one of the most underestimated pillars of cybersecurity because granting access involves trusting individuals with sensitive information and systems. The article examines the deep intersection of IT and security functions, the costs of manual access errors, and the need to align business processes with technical controls. It references a 2026 Identity Conf study showing 43.5% of organizations experienced errors in manual rights assignment and 33.5% left access for former employees. Recommendations draw on NIST Human-Centered Cybersecurity concepts, SP 800-53, and Russian FSTEC Order No. 117 to design lifecycle processes covering account provisioning, privilege reviews, and continuous monitoring. Models such as RBAC and ABAC are discussed alongside IGA and IdM solutions to ensure business permissions map correctly to application rights. The piece stresses that successful projects require joint IT and security efforts from the initial survey through pilot and acceptance phases while measuring both risk reduction and operational efficiency.