Russian Firms Accelerate Cybersecurity Strategy Adoption as Risk Reduction Emerges as Top Priority
Companies are increasingly developing information security strategies, yet they face growing obstacles from insufficient data and limited executive support. These findings emerged from viewer polls conducted during the AM Live broadcast titled “Information Security Strategy: Why It Is Needed and How to Defend It.”
During the discussion, experts examined how businesses should align security strategies with corporate objectives, define risk appetite and unacceptable events, distinguish a genuine strategy from a procurement list, and demonstrate value to leadership. Yaroslav Napalkov of MTS Bank shared a case in which presenting the strategy to top management provoked aggression and advised first establishing context. Nikolay Kazantsev of Securitm recommended that newcomers conduct “three cups of coffee” conversations with the CEO, IT teams, and other stakeholders.
Participants also addressed planning horizons of two to three years with annual updates, the role of backups and cyber drills, and practical cases involving ransomware, BYOD, DLP, and SOC construction. Over the past year the proportion of companies developing a strategy grew from 9% to 28%, while those with no plans at all declined from 26% to 21%. However, fewer organizations reached a fully operational document containing metrics and cyber exercises—16% versus 20% previously.
Barriers have also evolved. The share of respondents citing lack of исходных данных rose from 46% to 64%, and absence of top-management buy-in increased from 25% to 43%. Although personnel shortages remain the primary constraint, the figure eased to 59%. Nikolay Kazantsev noted that only 15–20% of security services maintain even a basic formalized risk register.
The leading objective for 2027—reducing risks and financial damage—was named by 78% of participants, a 23-percentage-point increase. Second place went to resilience and minimizing downtime of critical services at 57%. Natalya Glinina of Megafon Pro Business described this focus as logical because financial damage constitutes an unacceptable event that can halt business operations. Regulatory compliance stayed steady at 59%, while optimization of TCO and stack consolidation lost popularity, falling to 8% from 14%.
Related articles
Russian CA TCI Integrates ACME Protocol to Automate TLS Certificate Issuance
The Technical Center Internet (TCI), part of RTK-COD, has deployed a production ACME server compatible with standard clients such as acme.sh, Certbot and lego. The implementation aligns the ACME state machine with the existing isolated signing infrastructure, Domain Control Validation mechanisms and mandatory Certificate Transparency logging to Yandex and VK CT logs. Certificate lifetimes are shortening industry-wide, with Web PKI limits dropping to 47 days by 2029, making manual issuance unsustainable. The service supports HTTP-01 and DNS-01 challenges, ECDSA P-256 keys and certificate revocation, while preserving the requirement for Subject/CN in CSRs and mandatory revocation reasons. A separate staging environment uses an internal CT log simulator for safe testing. Future plans include full multi-SAN support, ARI (RFC 9773) and removal of the Subject/CN restriction.
Russia Pushes Corporate Multibanking Forward with Updated Open API Standards
The Bank of Russia and AFT have advanced Open Banking standards that enable corporate clients to aggregate account data across multiple banks within a single interface. The new specifications cover consent management, security profiles based on STO BR FAPI and OpenID Connect, and account information retrieval for both individuals and legal entities. While the 2025 pilot results demonstrated practical use cases such as personal financial assistants and corporate multibanking, the updated standards effective from October 2026 still lack a unified initiation-of-transfer component. Developers must therefore combine the new account-data APIs with separate bank-specific payment initiation mechanisms. The article explores how accounting systems or independent fintech services could become the primary workspace for financial directors managing payments, payroll, and liquidity across several banks. It also examines real-world challenges including idempotency handling, status reconciliation after network failures, and the separation of application permissions from signer authority. Examples from the UK Open Banking Limited sweeping VRP statistics illustrate how pre-authorized variable recurring payments can streamline operations while highlighting the additional policy work required for corporate supplier payments in Russia.
Hacker Attacks as Force Majeure: Russian and International Courts Diverge on Liability for Cyber Incidents
In November 2026, Russian hosting provider Beget suffered a major cyber attack that disrupted websites, virtual servers, email, DNS, and control panels for thousands of clients. Beget notified customers of circumstances resembling force majeure under Article 401 of the Russian Civil Code but stopped short of claiming automatic court recognition. Russian courts have reached inconsistent rulings on whether DDoS attacks and ransomware qualify as extraordinary and unavoidable events, examining factors such as attack scale, provider preparedness, and contractual obligations. International cases from France, Norway, the United States, and the Netherlands further illustrate that outcomes depend on evidence of prior security measures, backup integrity, and specific contractual language rather than the mere occurrence of an attack. Key precedents include disputes involving Timeweb, Expeditors, and Nordlo Haugesund where liability was limited or denied despite confirmed incidents. The analysis shows that even when force majeure is rejected, clients often struggle to recover full losses due to liability caps and proof requirements. Businesses are advised to maintain independent backups, review service agreements, and document incidents thoroughly to protect against financial exposure.
US Mandates Removal of Acronis from Federal Systems by January 2027 Over Russian Ties
US federal civilian agencies have been ordered to remove all Acronis products from their information systems by January 27, 2027, with new purchases also prohibited. The directive from the Department of Homeland Security, signed on July 31 and published in the Federal Register on October 30, covers Acronis AG along with Acronis Inc. and Acronis SCS. A nearly decade-long review examined whether Russian developers still access the code and whether supply chain risks have been sufficiently reduced, though no specific evidence of backdoors was reported by sources. After 2022, Acronis suspended operations in Russia and relocated specialists, while in 2025 Swedish firm EQT acquired a controlling stake with approval from the US CFIUS committee. Despite over 75 percent of shares now held by Western investors, these measures proved insufficient for continued access to federal systems. The ban does not extend to the private US market.