SPF, DKIM and DMARC: Practical Guide to Detecting Email Spoofing and Phishing
The article examines how SPF, DKIM, and DMARC help determine whether an incoming email was sent from an authorized server and whether its content remained unchanged.
SPF (Sender Policy Framework) lets domain owners publish TXT records that list permitted sending IP addresses. An example record is example.com. TXT "v=spf1 ip4:192.0.2.10 -all". Receiving servers compare the sending IP against this policy. However, SPF does not validate the visible From address, allowing attackers to spoof the displayed sender while using a different domain for the SMTP envelope.
Common SPF problems include missing new mail services after infrastructure changes, multiple SPF records for one domain, exceeding the ten-DNS-lookup limit, and overly permissive policies. Forwarding can also break SPF because the sending IP changes.
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) provides cryptographic signing of selected headers and the message body. The sending server signs with a private key; the public key is published in DNS, for example at selector1._domainkey.example.com. A typical DKIM-Signature header lists the signing domain, selector, signed headers, body hash, and signature. Successful verification confirms the signed parts were not altered, yet it does not prove the sender is trustworthy.
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) links SPF and DKIM results to the visible From domain. At least one of the two checks must pass with domain alignment. A sample DMARC record is _dmarc.example.com. TXT "v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@example.com". Policies range from none (monitor only) to quarantine or reject. Organizations are advised to start with monitoring and gradually tighten the policy after reviewing reports.
An Authentication-Results header such as spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bounce.example.com; dkim=pass header.d=example.com; dmarc=pass header.from=example.com indicates successful checks, yet does not rule out account compromise or malicious content sent from a legitimate domain.
Administrators should verify DNS records, align domains, analyze DMARC reports, and correct misconfigurations before enforcing stricter policies. End users should treat unexpected messages requesting urgent action or attachments with caution regardless of authentication results.
Related articles
Excerpt from Black Hat Rust Translation Details Chapter 9 on Phishing via WebAssembly and Social Engineering
A detailed excerpt from Chapter 9 of the Russian translation of Black Hat Rust has been published on Habr.com. The chapter focuses on phishing attacks that leverage WebAssembly when traditional technical vulnerabilities cannot be exploited due to lack of skills, team resources, or time. It explains social engineering principles based on Aristotle's Rhetoric, covering Ethos for building credibility, Pathos for creating emotional connections through storytelling, and Logos for logical justification of requests. The post emphasizes that human targets are often more vulnerable than infrastructure and that persuasion techniques have remained consistent for over 2000 years. The translator notes that code examples are preserved without modernization to serve as a lesson in verifying exploits independently, referencing common issues on platforms like Exploit-DB. The full chapter and previous translations are available in the associated GitHub repository.
Lost Control Series Highlights Realistic Social Engineering Attacks Disguised as Workplace Documents
A new micro-film in the Lost Control series demonstrates how employees can be tricked into compromising their organizations by opening files that appear to be routine work documents such as layoff lists, internal notices, or tax inspection alerts. The six-minute video recreates authentic attack vectors including phishing emails, fake download sites, bundled legitimate software packages, and phishing websites, as documented in five recent cases released by China's Ministry of Public Security Cyber Security Bureau. These attacks succeed because they mimic normal business communications rather than obvious malware delivery methods. The producers recommend sharing the film internally, reviewing work group messages from the past 30 days for suspicious attachments labeled as personnel lists or official notices, and verifying any such files before opening them. Organizations whose annual security training lacks measurable improvement in employee detection rates are invited to contact Allsec for assessment. Victims who have already clicked links or transferred funds are advised to call the national anti-fraud hotline 96110 immediately. The content is AI-generated with artistic modifications based on publicly reported incidents.
Students Recruited as Money Mules: How Scammers Target Youth with Fake Jobs, Gaming Lures and Sextortion
Russian students and schoolchildren are increasingly targeted by fraudsters offering easy part-time work, free in-game currency, or urgent academic verifications that lead to money mule schemes or account takeovers. Criminals exploit young people's need for income, interest in games like Roblox, and lack of experience with financial verification processes. Common tactics include fake job postings that turn participants into droppers under Article 187 of the Russian Criminal Code, phishing calls impersonating university staff, and malicious game mods for Minecraft or Brawl Stars. Victims risk criminal liability, banking restrictions from the Bank of Russia, and sextortion using AI-generated images. The report details seven major scam types and provides concrete protection steps including two-factor authentication and the Take It Down service.
OTP Bank Details How It Detects Professional Cashback Hunters and Card Rental Schemes
OTP Bank’s head of information security control, Alexander Shirokov, explains where legitimate use of cashback programs ends and abuse begins. The bank distinguishes rational use of tariffs from deliberate schemes created solely to extract maximum bonuses. Professional cashbackers who study rules in detail, rent cards, or share privileges are monitored through behavioral analytics and ML models. Such activity creates concentrated load on loyalty programs and can force banks to adjust conditions. The institution stresses that automatic systems are only the first layer and analysts review borderline cases to avoid penalizing ordinary customers.