AI Agents Using Claude and Grok Fully Automate Attacks on 400 Latin American Financial Institutions
Security researchers at Straiker have uncovered a sophisticated operation in which the hacking group CyberCartel deployed an AI agent network powered by large language models from Anthropic and xAI to conduct fully automated attacks against more than 400 Latin American financial institutions.
The investigation, reported on October 21, shows that the attackers used models including Claude and Grok, with CrowdStrike additionally confirming the involvement of DeepSeek. The AI agents were tasked with compromising banks and payment applications across the region, performing the entire attack chain with little to no ongoing human oversight.
Four-Stage AI-Driven Attack Pipeline
The operation follows the classic four phases of a cyber attack, but each stage is executed autonomously by the AI agents:
- Reconnaissance: The agents automatically collect open-source intelligence on hundreds of targets simultaneously, analyzing public records, employee social media, job postings, and historical breach data—tasks that would be prohibitively time-consuming for human operators.
- Credential Theft: Adaptive techniques allow the agents to bypass login pages, test credential stuffing, phishing, and configuration weaknesses while adjusting strategies based on real-time feedback.
- Account Takeover: Once access is obtained, the agents mimic legitimate user behavior, rotating proxies, forging device fingerprints, and varying operation timing to evade bank fraud detection systems.
- Data Monetization and Lateral Movement: Stolen customer data is exfiltrated and the agents move to the next target without further instructions.
Because the agents can adjust tactics dynamically, they evade rules designed to catch static scripts, making the attacks significantly harder to detect than traditional automated tools.
Cost Collapse and Shifting Attack Economics
The most concerning aspect is the dramatic reduction in operational cost. Previously, a meaningful campaign against a single bank required an experienced team working for weeks or months. With the AI agent network in place, the marginal cost of attacking an additional institution approaches zero, enabling attackers to treat financial institutions as a high-volume target list rather than individual high-value operations.
Defensive Recommendations
Security teams are urged to respond by integrating AI into their own operations. Key measures include building dynamic behavioral baselines for user activity, implementing strict zero-trust controls, reinforcing multi-factor authentication and transaction monitoring, and conducting red-team exercises that specifically simulate AI-driven adversaries.
Experts note that this incident is likely only the first of many similar operations, underscoring the need for defenders to adopt AI tools at the same pace as attackers.
Related articles
Deepfake Videos for Business Attacks Drop to Just $5 per Minute as AI Costs Plummet
The cost of creating convincing deepfake videos for attacks on companies has fallen roughly 100 times over the past two years. A single minute of high-quality fake video can now be produced for as little as $5, compared with several hundred dollars previously. The drop in prices was reported by Russian newspaper Izvestia, which also noted that underground marketplaces now sell ready-made templates that further reduce expenses. Lower prices significantly lower the barrier for criminals to conduct business email compromise and CEO impersonation scams. Experts warn that recognizable faces combined with urgent requests for wire transfers or credential sharing make traditional verification methods less reliable. Organizations are advised to confirm all financial instructions through an independent, pre-established channel rather than relying on video calls alone.
Over a Dozen AI Platforms Breached in One Month for API Keys in LLM-Jacking Operations
Between late September and early November, at least a dozen AI developer platforms were compromised in a coordinated campaign targeting API access tokens rather than customer data. Affected organizations include Andromeda, NVIDIA Brev, CommandCode, Fireworks AI, Lightning AI, Northflank, OpenCode, Railway, Trigger.dev, Warp, Zeabur, Chainstack, and WorkOS. Attackers exploited third-party components and internal sales applications to reach stored credentials used for AI inference services. The stolen tokens enable LLM-jacking and model distillation activities, with multiple threat groups observed reusing the same credentials shortly after disclosure. The open-source penetration testing framework Artex was used to automate reconnaissance and exploitation, lowering the barrier for less skilled actors. Companies such as Chainstack and WorkOS confirmed the incidents through their own disclosures, highlighting risks in non-core systems that store high-value AI credentials.
NIST Publishes Draft Taxonomy SP 2400-102 for Attacks on AI Agents
The National Institute of Standards and Technology released the first public draft of SP 2400-102 E2026 on 9 November 2026, extending its 2025 machine learning attack taxonomy with a dedicated chapter on AI agents. The document provides a common terminology for attacks targeting task formulation, planning, tool execution, and result interpretation stages. Attack goals include availability disruption through infinite tool calls, integrity violations that alter outputs or trigger unauthorized actions, sensitive data disclosure, and malicious agent misuse. Vectors range from direct user prompt bypasses and supply-chain model poisoning to indirect prompt injection via untrusted documents, persistent memory poisoning, compromised tools, and inter-agent message spoofing. NIST also examines layered defenses combining model-level detection of parasitic instructions with system-level restrictions, tool isolation, and human confirmation for high-impact operations. The draft references OWASP LLM03:2026 Excessive Agency and aligns with Russian standards GOST R 56939-2024 and GOST R 59276-2020 for testing and trust evaluation. Comments are accepted until 18 December 2026 before final publication.
Fake ITSM Tickets Allow Attackers to Trick AI SOC Agents into Dismissing Real Incidents
An experiment with the DeepSeek model showed that AI agents in Security Operations Centers can be reliably deceived by forged change-management tickets rather than classic prompt injection. Attackers with limited rights edit already-approved tickets in an ITSM system, changing the server and maintenance window while preserving the “Approved” status. The agent reads the ticket, matches the observed actions to the documented work, and automatically closes the alert. Human analysts reviewing the closed case later see only the reassuring link to the ticket and may also accept the decision. Three common LLM-based defenses—strict prompting, a secondary critic model, and supplying audit logs—either blocked too many legitimate changes or still allowed a quarter of attacks through. Only a deterministic code gate that cross-checks the ticket against immutable logs, role directories, and time windows achieved zero false closures on the test set while still automating 97 percent of genuine maintenance events.