Protecting Data Centers from Kinetic and Cyber Attacks: What Regulators Worldwide Are Proposing
InfoWatch has refreshed its April report on data center protection, examining regulatory responses to both kinetic and cyber threats across major jurisdictions. The analysis underscores that a functioning data center is now a prerequisite for business and state survival, as demonstrated by recent attacks on Yandex facilities that caused widespread service outages, repair costs, lost revenue, and share-price declines.
Experts identify three foundational elements of physical resilience. Tier III or Tier IV standards ensure continued operation during power or cooling failures. Access control now routinely includes anti-drone systems alongside biometric measures. Geographic distribution requires multiple redundant clusters rather than simple two- or three-site replication, with growing acceptance of initial-level air-defense systems or hardened underground facilities.
Why cyber defenses remain essential
Even as attention shifts to physical protection, cyber risks cannot be deprioritized. Kinetic strikes are typically followed by cyber operations that hinder recovery. Core recommendations include terabit-scale DDoS mitigation at backbone level, Zero Trust network segmentation, and accelerated import substitution of security tools and next-generation firewalls to eliminate remote-control risks.
United States
The Cyberstrategy for America 2026 prioritizes offensive cyber operations, adversary-behavior modeling, Zero Trust modernization of government networks, and exclusion of foreign vendors from supply chains. Data centers have been formally designated critical infrastructure, with emphasis moving from isolated security teams to AI-driven autonomous SOC platforms.
European Union
Key instruments are ProtectEU and the Cyber Solidarity Act. Since February 2025 the European Early Warning System has provided real-time threat detection across member states. DORA imposes strict resilience and certification requirements on the financial sector. The Tallinn Manual 3.0 classifies attacks on physical data-center infrastructure as potential acts of aggression when effects are comparable to armed attack.
Russia
The national concept for countering cybercrime through 2030 stresses technological sovereignty, targeting a reduction of foreign security solutions to 4 percent by 2030 while growing the domestic market to nearly one trillion rubles. Presidential Decree No. 604 of 24 August 2026 authorizes temporary state management of critical infrastructure operators that fail to ensure adequate protection or timely recovery. The Ministry of Digital Development is evaluating hardened, underground, or remote sites in energy-surplus regions such as the Urals and Eastern Siberia. Additional measures include project financing, special investment contracts, preferential lending, and temporary permission for affected companies to process personal data in friendly jurisdictions until March 2028. A new data-center law effective March 2026 introduces operator registration, security requirements, and a ban on mining at data-center sites.
The report concludes that data centers have become high-value targets, as illustrated by Iranian statements designating Western cloud infrastructure as legitimate military objectives and reported strikes on AWS facilities in Bahrain and the UAE. Regulators worldwide are therefore accelerating both physical hardening and regulatory oversight.
Related articles
Evaluating Secure Development Maturity: Comparing BSIMM, DSOMM, SAMM and GOST R 56939-2024
A detailed analysis compares four methodologies for self-assessing secure software development maturity in Russian companies. The review covers BSIMM from Black Duck, OWASP DSOMM, OWASP SAMM and the updated Russian national standard GOST R 56939-2024. Each model was tested through a simulated audit on a fictional company called ООО «Лиса и лосЬ» that uses GitLab, Nexus and SonarQube. The evaluation scored the methodologies on criteria including ease of maturity calculation, recommendation generation, roadmap building, heat-map creation and SDLC coverage. GOST R 56939-2024 and SAMM received the highest total scores of 35 and 34 out of 47. The article concludes that no single methodology covers all needs and recommends combining approaches tailored to specific company contexts.
GlobalSign Launches New Wave of SSL/TLS Certificate Revocations Targeting Russian Organizations
GlobalSign has initiated another round of revocations affecting SSL/TLS certificates issued to Russian websites, with a total of 11,000 certificates withdrawn from 1,300 organizations so far. The revocations primarily impact entities listed in EU and US sanctions regimes, in line with updated CA/Browser Forum requirements that took effect in May 2026. Greek CA HARICA has also participated in the revocations, sometimes completing the process within seconds and leaving site owners little time to respond. The actions stem from mandatory checks against the OFAC SDN List, BIS Denied Persons List, and equivalent European sanctions databases. Russian authorities recommend obtaining domestic TLS certificates via Gosuslugi within three business days to maintain secure access in foreign browsers. Let's Encrypt has similarly updated its policies to restrict certificates for sanctioned Russian entities while continuing issuance for others.
Kaspersky Container Security Earns FSTEC Russia Certification as Antivirus Protection Tool
Kaspersky Container Security has received official certification from FSTEC Russia under certificate number 5122 dated October 23, 2026. The product was validated as a means of antivirus protection and meets the regulator’s requirements at the fourth level of trust. It also complies with the protection profile of type B for the fourth class, designated IT.SAVZ.B4.PZ. The certification enables deployment of the solution in government information systems, personal data processing environments, critical information infrastructure facilities, and industrial control systems. Specific usage must still align with individual system requirements and the conditions stated in the certificate. The solution has been listed in the Russian software registry maintained by the Ministry of Digital Development since 2023. Primary audiences include government agencies, large enterprises, and industrial operators that rely on containerized workloads inside regulated perimeters.
Russian Lawmaker Clarifies Apple and Microsoft ORI Registry Listing Does Not Ban Products
State Duma deputy Anton Nemkin stated that the inclusion of Apple and Microsoft in Russia's ORI registry imposes standard data retention obligations without automatically prohibiting their products. The registry entry requires companies to store user information and message exchange records in Russia for three years and message content for up to six months. Nemkin emphasized that these rules apply equally to Russian and foreign digital market participants regardless of business scale or country of registration. The companies were added on October 2, 2026, while Google Meet has been listed since January 26. Although the status mandates data provision to authorized bodies in legally defined cases, the listing itself does not confirm that corporations will share Russian users' correspondence with the state. Non-compliance may trigger separate regulatory measures, but the deputy urged against exaggerating consequences through sensational headlines.