Only 11% of Organizations Fully Ready for New Russian Critical Infrastructure Protection Rules

An AM Live broadcast on KII security revealed that just 11% of surveyed organizations have completed all preparations ahead of the March 1, 2027 deadline for updated critical information infrastructure requirements. Experts discussed the shift from process-based approaches to sector-specific model objects, new obligations for calculating protection indicators every six months and maturity levels every three years, and practical challenges including import substitution compatibility, contractor oversight, remote access, and incident readiness. Speakers stressed that delaying preparations until the last day is risky and recommended starting early to meet both regulatory and internal security needs. The 239th order measures were highlighted as closely aligned with protection indicators, while failure to supply requested documentation within 30 days can reset scores to zero. Audience polls showed 53% view software and hardware compatibility during replacement as the biggest barrier, with many calling for real-world pilot testing rather than relying on vendor claims.

AntiMalwareTranslated from Russian

Read at source

Only 11% of companies are fully prepared for new requirements on protecting critical information infrastructure (KII), according to a viewer poll conducted during the AM Live broadcast. The episode focused on KII security and examined the transition from process-oriented methods to standardized sector-specific objects.

Participants reviewed upcoming obligations effective March 1, 2027, including biannual calculations of protection indicators and triennial maturity assessments. Practical issues such as compatibility during import substitution, contractor control, remote access management, and incident response readiness were also addressed in detail.

The poll indicated that another 34% of organizations are still determining exactly what changes are needed, while 12% stated they do not qualify as KII subjects. Expert Alexey Orekhov advised against last-minute planning, noting that calculations completed on February 28 would not produce valid results by the deadline and urging organizations to begin preparations early for their own benefit.

Yuri Podgorbunsky pointed out that the protection indicator correlates at 90% with measures in the 239th order, making compliance achievable when systems are properly configured. Sergey Saiganov reminded attendees that failure to provide requested documentation to regulators within 30 days results in the indicator being reset to zero.

Among obstacles to genuine security, 53% of viewers cited compatibility problems when replacing software and equipment. Konstantin Zakatov recommended purchasing only hardware with pre-existing compatibility certificates. Alexander Sukhovey stressed the need for actual pilot testing, as vendor statements often fail in practice.

Additional challenges included budget and specialist shortages. On verification of protective measures, 50% reported conducting technical security checks, 36% performed audits, and only 9% held response exercises. Experts described the low rate of drills as a significant weakness and called for integrating response practice into standard IT and security processes.

Meridian digestThe week's most consequential security stories, distilled into one briefing.See the digest

More in Policy & Regulation

Google Opens Registration for Registered App Stores Program to Simplify Third-Party App Installs on Android
Mobile Internet Slowdowns Reported in Central Moscow as Content Filtering Systems Activate for Summits
Protecting Data Centers from Kinetic and Cyber Attacks: What Regulators Worldwide Are Proposing