Habr•October 31, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

How to Check If Your Passwords Have Leaked Online Using Have I Been Pwned

There is an unpleasant feature of the internet: you register on some site, forget about it a couple of years later, and then it turns out that its database has long been circulating on the network. It is one thing if only an old username leaked with it. It is far more concerning when the same database also contained an email address and password, especially if that password still works on your primary account.

The good news is that some of these leaks can be checked independently and for free. The bad news is that there is still no magic button to “check absolutely everything.” This guide explains where to look for traces of leaks, how to interpret the results correctly, and what to do if your data really has been exposed.

What does it mean when a password leaks?

Several different scenarios are often lumped together. The first is a site database breach: an attacker exploited a vulnerability and obtained user data. Depending on the system design, the database may contain email addresses, names, phone numbers, and passwords.

The second scenario is password reuse. You created one password for a forum, then used it for email and a gaming account. If the forum is breached, the other services become vulnerable too. This is called credential stuffing: attackers automatically test the discovered login-password pairs on other platforms.

The third scenario is a stealer on the device. Malware can harvest saved passwords, browser data, and active sessions. In this case the problem is not necessarily tied to any particular website being hacked. That is why the absence of your email from known breach databases does not guarantee that everything is clean.

Checking your email with Have I Been Pwned

The service Have I Been Pwned aggregates information about known breaches and lets you check whether an email address appears in published datasets. The process is straightforward: open the official site, enter your email address, run the check, and review the incidents and types of data disclosed.

If matches are found, there is no need to panic immediately. The mere presence of the address does not mean someone is currently inside your mailbox. It is important to examine exactly which data fields were exposed and when the incident occurred. Some leaks contain only email addresses; others include additional details such as credentials.

Another point: an email may appear in a breach of a service you do not even remember. This is not necessarily an error. The service may have changed its name, the data may have been aggregated, or the address may have been entered by someone else.

If no matches appear, that is a positive sign but not proof of complete safety. The service’s database does not contain every breach that has ever occurred.

Can you check the password itself?

Yes, but with an important rule: never enter your current password into random websites that promise to check it for leaks. Have I Been Pwned offers a separate service called Pwned Passwords for checking known compromised passwords. It uses hashing so that passwords are not stored together with personal user data.

If a password is found, it should no longer be used. Even if it is long and contains numbers, symbols, and mixed-case letters, the fact of a previous leak makes it a poor choice for protecting an account.

It is essential not to confuse the two results: an email found in a breach means the address appeared in a known dataset; a password found in the compromised-password database means the secret itself has been seen in disclosed data. These are different checks and one does not replace the other.

What to do if data has actually leaked

If the check reveals several incidents, act in a structured way:

  • Change reused passwords, starting with email, banking, financial services, password managers, and accounts used for recovery.
  • Enable multi-factor authentication wherever possible, preferably with passkeys or hardware security keys.
  • Terminate old sessions by reviewing active devices and ending unfamiliar logins.
  • If device compromise is suspected, scan the system, update the operating system and browser, and change passwords from a known-clean device.

Habits that genuinely help

Use a password manager to generate unique random passwords. Do not ignore login notifications. Keep software updated. Avoid clicking links in suspicious messages; instead, open services directly through known addresses.

Checking for leaks is a useful habit but not a complete security audit. The most effective strategy remains straightforward: unique passwords, MFA, up-to-date devices, and attention to login alerts. It is best to verify security before you have to search the internet for account-recovery instructions.

Related articles

AntiMalware•Data Breaches & Leaks

Yandex Restores Access to 96% of Yandex Disk Data After Data Center Attacks

Yandex has recovered access to 96 percent of user data stored on Yandex Disk following attacks that damaged its data centers. Files including documents, photographs, and videos are once again available for opening, downloading, and sharing for the majority of users. The company continues to redistribute Disk capacity across independent external sites to improve overall resilience. Basic operations such as uploading, downloading, and synchronization are now functional, yet the web version still imposes restrictions on bulk actions like downloading entire folders or multiple files at once. Users are advised to rely on the desktop client or API for these tasks during the remaining recovery phase. Yandex publishes ongoing updates on the official Yandex 360 service status page and has not provided an exact date for full restoration.

BoletimSec•Data Breaches & Leaks

k0t Operators Breach Corporate Firewalls and VPNs Exposing Over 70,000 Credentials

Group-IB and NyxLab detailed a campaign by the operator k0t targeting exposed firewalls and VPN portals. The operation collected more than 70,000 credentials from network devices and LDAP directory extractions across 84 compromised appliances. Initial access relied on CVE-2025-64446 directory traversal in FortiWeb, CVE-2026-0257 authentication bypass in Palo Alto GlobalProtect, and password brute-forcing against FortiGate devices. Attackers then leveraged CVE-2019-6693 to decrypt FortiOS configuration secrets and chained the noPac technique to reach domain administrator privileges. Persistence was achieved through MeshCentral, AdaptixC2, Atera, AnyDesk, and ngrok, while Rclone handled data exfiltration to cloud storage. Victims appeared on the Qilin and The Gentlemen leak sites, suggesting the operators likely act as initial-access brokers rather than direct ransomware affiliates.

BoletimSec•Data Breaches & Leaks

OpenCode Reports Possible Exposure of Third-Party API Keys After Legacy System Breach

OpenCode disclosed that an attacker accessed a legacy system on October 16, potentially exposing API keys from external providers that users had stored in the Console. The incident affected only 1.4 percent of Console users, and the targeted system was already undergoing decommissioning. The company described the exposure as possible rather than confirmed and provided no details on the attack vector, duration, or number of keys involved. Some affected users reported unauthorized charges on their provider accounts. OpenCode stated that the incident was limited to keys stored in the Console and did not impact keys saved locally in its command-line or desktop applications. The firm notified impacted users by email on October 17 and is working with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. It recommended revoking and rotating exposed keys directly with each provider.

AntiMalware•Data Breaches & Leaks

Moscow Court Places Dodo Pizza Cyberattack Suspect Denis Fridman Under House Arrest Until 2026

The Tverskoy District Court of Moscow has ordered Denis Fridman to remain under house arrest until December 8, 2026, in connection with a cyberattack on Dodo Pizza that occurred in late September. Fridman faces charges under paragraphs a and v of part 3 of Article 272.1 of the Russian Criminal Code, which covers the illegal circulation of computer information containing personal data. Investigators detained three of the four suspects after Fridman failed to mask his real IP address while accessing the stolen dataset. The breach lasted two days, but Dodo Pizza quickly blocked access and confirmed that payment details were not compromised because the company does not store them. Authorities notified Roskomnadzor of the incident and implemented measures to forcibly terminate active user sessions where necessary. House arrest remains a preventive measure, and Fridman’s guilt has not yet been established by the court.