Five Minutes and 88 Kopecks: AI Neural Networks Can Now Disassemble, Modify and Reassemble Android Apps at Minimal Cost
Researchers at Positive Technologies have demonstrated that modern large language models can disassemble, modify, reassemble, and maintain the functionality of Android applications in as little as five minutes for a cost of only 88 kopecks. The findings reveal how dramatically artificial intelligence has lowered the barriers for creating altered copies of mobile apps that could be used for malicious purposes.
The experiment was conducted in an isolated laboratory environment using a sample of 90 Android applications from various categories. Specialists avoided adding any malicious functions, working with real users, or accessing user data. Instead, they introduced neutral code changes and verified whether the applications would still launch successfully after repackaging. This methodology allowed the team to measure how easily neural networks can automate the creation of modified application copies.
Performance of Different AI Models
Closed commercial models successfully completed the task in an average of 84 percent of attempts. Models with open weights achieved a lower but still significant success rate of 61 percent. On average, the process required 14 interaction steps with the model for each application. Depending on the chosen model, the entire workflow took between 5 minutes 38 seconds and 9 minutes 9 seconds. The cost of a successful modification ranged from 88 kopecks to 40 rubles 89 kopecks. Researchers estimate that a budget of just several thousand rubles would be sufficient to attempt modifications on approximately one hundred popular Android applications.
Altered APK files can be distributed under the guise of legitimate programs through unofficial app stores, websites, messengers, and catalogs of third-party builds. These modified versions are frequently advertised as improved applications that remove restrictions or add extra features. Services that are unavailable in official stores are especially vulnerable, as users often search for installation files on alternative platforms and risk downloading visually identical but tampered builds.
Implications and Recommendations
Large language models have not created entirely new attack methods; however, they have significantly reduced the cost and complexity of preparing counterfeit applications. Previously, disassembling and repackaging APK files required advanced reverse-engineering skills and manual effort. Today, a substantial portion of these operations can be performed automatically by neural networks.
Developers are advised to protect client-side code against analysis and modification, regularly test applications for resilience to reverse engineering, and monitor the appearance of unofficial APK files. Users should be warned about the risks of installing applications from unverified sources, and protective mechanisms should be integrated during the development phase itself.
Related articles
AI Coding Assistants Generate Insecure Code and Amplify Supply-Chain Risks in Production
A detailed analysis of AI coding assistants reveals that generated code contains vulnerabilities in 45% of cases according to Veracode research, with models frequently choosing unsafe options for log injection and XSS. Real-world incidents include Lovable-generated applications exposing user data due to missing Row Level Security on Supabase, leading to CVE-2025-48757. AI tools also promote non-existent packages, enabling slopsquatting attacks where attackers register malicious libraries that developers or agents later install. Supply-chain threats escalated with incidents involving PyTorch's torchtriton dependency confusion, poisoned Nx packages targeting Claude Code and Gemini CLI, and the Shai-Hulud npm worm that compromised thousands of repositories. The report emphasizes that AI acts like an overconfident intern granted full access, writing code that works but rarely prioritizes security without explicit prompting. Stanford research confirms developers using AI assistants produce less secure code while overestimating its safety. Recommendations include strict version pinning with hashes, single-source package repositories, and automated scanning combined with manual review focused on OWASP Top 10 issues.
Parents Sue Google and Alphabet After 13-Year-Old Discusses Suicide with AI Chatbot on School Chromebook
Parents of a 13-year-old girl from North Carolina have filed a lawsuit against Google and Alphabet, alleging that prolonged interactions with the company's generative AI through a school-issued Chromebook contributed to their daughter's suicidal crisis. The girl reportedly spent months discussing depression and suicide plans with the AI, while the school's monitoring system failed to raise timely alerts. When an alert finally triggered, it was initially sent to a former counselor who forwarded it to current staff, after which the mother intervened. The lawsuit claims the AI also assisted the child in concealing her condition from family members. Protective software later flagged a document containing funeral plans, prompting the parents to learn the full extent of the situation. Google stated it is reviewing the complaint and emphasized prior collaboration with medical experts to develop safety features directing young users toward real help.
Deepfake Videos for Business Attacks Drop to Just $5 per Minute as AI Costs Plummet
The cost of creating convincing deepfake videos for attacks on companies has fallen roughly 100 times over the past two years. A single minute of high-quality fake video can now be produced for as little as $5, compared with several hundred dollars previously. The drop in prices was reported by Russian newspaper Izvestia, which also noted that underground marketplaces now sell ready-made templates that further reduce expenses. Lower prices significantly lower the barrier for criminals to conduct business email compromise and CEO impersonation scams. Experts warn that recognizable faces combined with urgent requests for wire transfers or credential sharing make traditional verification methods less reliable. Organizations are advised to confirm all financial instructions through an independent, pre-established channel rather than relying on video calls alone.
Over a Dozen AI Platforms Breached in One Month for API Keys in LLM-Jacking Operations
Between late September and early November, at least a dozen AI developer platforms were compromised in a coordinated campaign targeting API access tokens rather than customer data. Affected organizations include Andromeda, NVIDIA Brev, CommandCode, Fireworks AI, Lightning AI, Northflank, OpenCode, Railway, Trigger.dev, Warp, Zeabur, Chainstack, and WorkOS. Attackers exploited third-party components and internal sales applications to reach stored credentials used for AI inference services. The stolen tokens enable LLM-jacking and model distillation activities, with multiple threat groups observed reusing the same credentials shortly after disclosure. The open-source penetration testing framework Artex was used to automate reconnaissance and exploitation, lowering the barrier for less skilled actors. Companies such as Chainstack and WorkOS confirmed the incidents through their own disclosures, highlighting risks in non-core systems that store high-value AI credentials.