Hidden Spy for 1.6 Million Users: Popular Browser Extension ModHeader Secretly Collected Browsing History
Google and Microsoft have removed the widely used ModHeader browser extension from their official stores after researchers uncovered a hidden mechanism capable of secretly collecting users' browsing history. The extension, which boasted roughly 1.6 million installations, had maintained a reputation as a legitimate developer tool for years before the malicious functionality was exposed.
ModHeader enables users to modify HTTP headers exchanged between the browser and websites. It is commonly employed by developers and QA specialists to test web applications, inject authorization tokens, and simulate different request parameters without altering source code.
Discovery and Removal Timeline
Researchers at the British company Stripe OLT analyzed the extension's code using signatures from the Chrome Web Store and confirmed that the suspicious module was present in the authentic build, not a counterfeit. Microsoft removed the extension from the Edge store on July 3, while Google removed the Chrome version on July 10.
How the Hidden Collector Worked
Although ModHeader continued to perform its advertised functions, its background code contained a separate data-collection mechanism. Upon launch, the extension generated a device fingerprint, extracted domains from open pages, encrypted the data, and could store up to 1,000 addresses locally. Once per day, the list was scheduled to be sent to api.stanfordstudies[.]com together with the device fingerprint, after which the local copy would be deleted.
The collector remained inactive because it was configured to activate only for browsers listed in an internal array that was supplied empty. No evidence of actual data collection or transmission was found. However, the developer could have enabled the feature at any time through a routine update without requesting additional permissions or user interaction.
Active Telemetry and Data Exposure
Partial telemetry was already operational. On installation, update, and removal, ModHeader sent product, version, and browser information to extensions-hub[.]com. Additionally, a script running on every page saved request metadata in plaintext. Automated security scanners rated the extension as low-risk because the history-collection feature was disabled, data was encrypted, and the code was hidden inside a legitimate project.
Recommendations for Users and Administrators
- Immediately remove ModHeader from Chrome and Edge and verify that it has not been restored via profile synchronization or corporate policy.
- Replace any API keys, access tokens, or session cookies that were entered through the extension.
- Administrators should block the domains stanfordstudies[.]com and extensions-hub[.]com and review logs for connections to these domains or the extension identifier.
Related articles
Anthropic Releases Eight Claude Code Updates in August Focused on Multi-Agent Workflows
Between August 13 and 21, Anthropic shipped eight consecutive Claude Code releases from version 2.1.232 to 2.1.239. The updates center on enabling multiple long-running agents that can share context, communicate across sessions, and continue work automatically after hitting usage limits. Key additions include subagent forking that inherits prompt cache and conversation history, cross-session messaging via @mentions, and an automatic mode that uses a classifier model to approve actions. Additional improvements cover GitLab merge request integration, memory management fixes for extended sessions, and support for native add-ons in musl-based Alpine environments. The changes significantly expand the scale of tasks that can be delegated to Claude Code without constant human oversight.
Selectel Revenue Exceeds 10 Billion Rubles as Cloud Services Drive Growth Amid Rising Costs
Selectel reported revenue of 10.2 billion rubles for the first half of 2026, marking a 14 percent increase compared with the same period a year earlier. Cloud infrastructure services remained the primary growth engine, contributing 8.9 billion rubles or 87 percent of total revenue. The customer base expanded by 14,400 clients over twelve months to reach 44,500, with smaller customers fueling much of the increase through new VDS configurations. Professional services showed the fastest consumption growth at 1.4 times, while financial and IT sectors raised infrastructure spending by 1.3 times. Adjusted EBITDA rose only 3 percent to 5.4 billion rubles, lowering its margin from 59 percent to 53 percent, and net profit stayed nearly flat at 1.9 billion rubles with margin declining from 21 percent to 18 percent. Operating expenses jumped 23 percent to 4.7 billion rubles, driven mainly by payroll costs that accounted for 65 percent of the total. The company invested 6.4 billion rubles in development, including 4.4 billion rubles on server equipment, a 1.8-fold increase, while expanding GPU purchases for AI workloads despite higher component prices, resulting in negative free cash flow of 3.4 billion rubles and a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.1.
Russian Backup Market Hits 10.6 Billion Rubles as Domestic Solutions Reach 70% Share
The Russian market for backup solutions grew 18.5% in 2025 to reach 10.6 billion rubles, outpacing the overall infrastructure software segment which expanded 16%. Domestic vendors increased their share from 19% in 2021 to 70% in 2025, with analysts from Strategy Partners forecasting further growth to 92% by 2030 and a market size of 24 billion rubles. Cyberprotect maintains the leading position with its Cyber Backup product, while Astra Group’s RuBackup is noted as another significant offering. The company itself estimates the market at approximately 12 billion rubles and claims a 56% share. Competition is shifting from feature lists toward compatibility with Russian virtualization platforms, databases, Kubernetes environments, storage systems, and monitoring tools. The broader infrastructure software market reached 158 billion rubles in 2025, with Russian developers holding 68% compared to just 8% four years earlier.
Google Issues Clear 2026 Guidance: No Separate SEO for AI Overviews or AI Mode
Google has published dedicated documentation clarifying that optimization for generative search features remains standard SEO. The company stresses that pages must be crawlable, indexable, relevant to user intent, and contain reliable information that the system can extract and synthesize. While classic ranking still applies, generative systems now evaluate pages across multiple stages including retrieval, fact extraction, cross-referencing, and citation decisions. Google explicitly rejects the need for llms.txt files, special AI-oriented Schema markup, or content rewritten specifically for language models. Instead, the focus is on non-commodity content that provides unique data, concrete metrics, and genuine user value. The guidance also warns against scaled content abuse and doorway-style pages created solely to capture long-tail AI-generated queries.