Hidden Spy for 1.6 Million Users: Popular Browser Extension ModHeader Secretly Collected Browsing History
Google and Microsoft have removed the widely used ModHeader browser extension from their official stores after researchers uncovered a hidden mechanism capable of secretly collecting users' browsing history. The extension, which boasted roughly 1.6 million installations, had maintained a reputation as a legitimate developer tool for years before the malicious functionality was exposed.
ModHeader enables users to modify HTTP headers exchanged between the browser and websites. It is commonly employed by developers and QA specialists to test web applications, inject authorization tokens, and simulate different request parameters without altering source code.
Discovery and Removal Timeline
Researchers at the British company Stripe OLT analyzed the extension's code using signatures from the Chrome Web Store and confirmed that the suspicious module was present in the authentic build, not a counterfeit. Microsoft removed the extension from the Edge store on July 3, while Google removed the Chrome version on July 10.
How the Hidden Collector Worked
Although ModHeader continued to perform its advertised functions, its background code contained a separate data-collection mechanism. Upon launch, the extension generated a device fingerprint, extracted domains from open pages, encrypted the data, and could store up to 1,000 addresses locally. Once per day, the list was scheduled to be sent to api.stanfordstudies[.]com together with the device fingerprint, after which the local copy would be deleted.
The collector remained inactive because it was configured to activate only for browsers listed in an internal array that was supplied empty. No evidence of actual data collection or transmission was found. However, the developer could have enabled the feature at any time through a routine update without requesting additional permissions or user interaction.
Active Telemetry and Data Exposure
Partial telemetry was already operational. On installation, update, and removal, ModHeader sent product, version, and browser information to extensions-hub[.]com. Additionally, a script running on every page saved request metadata in plaintext. Automated security scanners rated the extension as low-risk because the history-collection feature was disabled, data was encrypted, and the code was hidden inside a legitimate project.
Recommendations for Users and Administrators
- Immediately remove ModHeader from Chrome and Edge and verify that it has not been restored via profile synchronization or corporate policy.
- Replace any API keys, access tokens, or session cookies that were entered through the extension.
- Administrators should block the domains stanfordstudies[.]com and extensions-hub[.]com and review logs for connections to these domains or the extension identifier.
Related articles
Rostelecom Suffers Mass Outage Disrupting Website, Mobile App and Personal Account
Rostelecom experienced a significant service disruption that left its official website, mobile application, and customer personal account either unavailable or functioning with errors. The first reports of problems began arriving around 12:40 Moscow time. Over a 24-hour period, the monitoring service Detector404 recorded approximately 2,500 user complaints. The largest share, 59 percent, originated from the Nizhny Novgorod region, followed by 4 percent from Kursk region and 2 percent each from Ryazan and Ivanovo regions. Rostelecom has not issued any official statement regarding the incident, and the root cause along with the timeline for full restoration remain unknown. The outage occurred in the same week that hosting provider ESTT suffered a similar infrastructure failure.
Russian State Duma Rejects Bill Proposing Fines for Covering Face in Public
On November 11 the State Duma rejected bill No. 1159193-8 that sought to introduce a new article in the Code of Administrative Offenses punishing appearance in public places with a face covered in a way that prevents identification. The draft included exceptions for medical reasons, official duties, weather conditions, and sports or cultural events. Two committees of the Federation Council on defense and security as well as constitutional legislation opposed the measure. The Duma committee on criminal and administrative legislation found the wording too vague and lacking legal certainty. It also noted that new offenses require prior federal-law prohibitions. On the same day lawmakers rejected another bill introducing criminal liability for crimes committed with deepfakes.
Basis Launches Basis AIR Platform to Optimize Shared GPU Resources for AI Projects
Basis, part of the RTK Data Centers group, has introduced Basis AIR, a platform designed to allocate computing resources across multiple AI initiatives within organizations. The solution targets small, medium, and large enterprises that have invested in expensive GPU hardware but face uneven utilization, with some teams waiting for capacity while others leave accelerators idle. According to the company, Basis AIR can increase accelerator utilization from 30% to 80% by enforcing task priorities, departmental quotas, and dynamic resource sharing. The platform supports running multiple workloads on a single accelerator and allows teams to borrow additional capacity when resources are available. It generates detailed consumption reports by project and division, helping executives decide whether new GPU purchases are truly necessary before approving further hardware acquisitions. Basis AIR is deployed on-premises in the customer’s data center, operates without internet connectivity, and integrates with third-party infrastructure platforms without requiring other Basis products.
30 Tools for Six Core Information Security Tasks: From Recon to Forensics
The article provides a practical guide for system administrators managing a single website, database, and server setup. It covers 30 specific tools across six categories: reconnaissance, web application testing, infrastructure scanning, incident response, digital forensics, and secure development practices. Each section recommends five tools with explanations of their use cases, such as discovering forgotten assets like test2 or analyzing network traffic during off-hours incidents. Tools include Subfinder for passive subdomain enumeration, Burp Suite for request inspection, Nmap for port scanning, Zeek for structured logging, Autopsy for disk image analysis, and Gitleaks for secret detection in Git history. The guide emphasizes proper documentation of assets, including ownership confirmation by colleagues like Lena, and highlights limitations such as VPN effects on scan results or TLS termination at load balancers. It concludes by stressing the value of maintaining accurate records to simplify future certificate renewals and incident handling.