securitylab_nJuly 15, 2026🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Intel Unveils Starfire Chip Designed for AI Processing on US Military Satellites in Orbit

Intel has introduced a new system-on-chip called Starfire that is intended to operate not in data centers but in Earth orbit, where it must endure temperature swings from -55 °C to 125 °C and continuous exposure to cosmic radiation.

The chip was developed under contract for the US government and combines eight general-purpose CPU cores, a three-die neural-network accelerator, and a graphics block inside a single Foveros package. Two power variants are offered: a 10 W version rated at up to 45 TOPS and a 35 W version rated at up to 75 TOPS.

Manufacturing processes are deliberately split inside the same package. The CPU cores and neural accelerator are fabricated on Intel’s leading-edge Intel 18A node, while the graphics module uses the more mature Intel 3 process—the same heterogeneous approach Intel previously employed in the server processor Clearwater Forest. Because smaller transistors hold less charge, they are more susceptible to single-event upsets from space radiation; therefore, reliability will be achieved through circuit-level and architectural hardening rather than process maturity alone.

For decades the space-grade processor market has been dominated by BAE Systems’ RAD750, a 200 MHz device flying on Mars rovers and the Kepler and Fermi telescopes. Newer offerings such as the RAD5545 and a forthcoming Microchip design for NASA promise roughly an order-of-magnitude performance increase, yet they remain focused on telemetry and control. Starfire, with its dedicated neural accelerator, is aimed at a different mission: performing artificial-intelligence inference and real-time data analysis directly on board the satellite.

The device is still a demonstration vehicle. Radiation-tolerance figures are still being measured, and the chip has not yet received formal space-radiation certification. Intel cautions that final specifications may change. First engineering samples are slated for delivery in the third quarter of 2026 through the company’s Intel Government Technologies division.

The project carries strategic weight for Intel, which remains the only US company capable of producing chips of this complexity. It participates in the Pentagon’s RAMP-C and SHIP programs. Company roadmaps indicate that 18A process yields are expected to reach industry parity only in 2027, potentially affecting the timeline for volume production of space-qualified parts.

Related articles

SecuritylabOther

Why AI Chatbots Misread Polished Reports and How to Prepare AI-Ready Content

Beautifully designed reports often confuse AI systems because visual layout does not preserve logical relationships between elements. When design is stripped away, machines may lose connections between headings, numbers, tables, and footnotes, leading to incorrect interpretations of key facts such as revenue growth. The solution is to create AI Ready content that maintains structure, semantics, and context even after text extraction or copying. This approach aligns closely with web accessibility standards from W3C and benefits both human readers using assistive technologies and automated analysis tools. Organizations are advised to use tagged PDFs following PDF/UA and ISO 14289-2:2024, provide data in XLSX or CSV alongside visual charts, and ensure every important figure travels with its full context including period, unit, and comparison base. The same principles apply to presentations, press releases, websites, and multimedia content.

HabrOther

Statistical Analysis in OSINT: Tools, Methods and Real-World Intelligence Applications

The article explains why statistical processing has become an essential component of professional OSINT work when analysts face large volumes of raw data. It outlines five core tasks that statistical methods solve: actor profiling, disinformation monitoring through time-series and graph analysis, financial intelligence, geospatial verification, and threat assessment. The text compares popular tools including Maltego, Gephi, Python, R, Power BI, Tableau and SpiderFoot, stressing that real investigations usually combine several of them. Detailed examples show how Pearson correlation, Louvain clustering and TF-IDF or BERT embeddings help identify coordinated botnets in social media. Famous leaks such as Panama Papers and Pandora Papers are presented as landmark cases where regression models, cluster analysis and network graphs exposed hidden ownership structures. The piece also lists open statistical sources from national agencies, international organisations and technical platforms, and reviews key mathematical techniques from basic descriptive statistics to ARIMA, CUSUM, DBSCAN and dimensionality reduction methods.

HabrOther

Bot Traffic Overtakes Human Traffic in 2024 as AI Agents and Scrapers Surge

Analysis of internet traffic from 2013 to 2026 shows automated bots steadily eroding human dominance online. Imperva data reveals human traffic fell to 47 percent by 2025 while malicious bots reached 40 percent. Good bots such as search crawlers remain stable, but gray AI agents and scrapers now drive much of the growth. Companies face rising infrastructure costs from bot traffic that generates no revenue, described as an invisible tax. Cloudflare and Akamai reports confirm high volumes of automated requests, with many classified as harmful scraping. The trend raises concerns about a synthetic internet shaped more by AI recommendations than human activity.

HabrOther

Understanding Security Alerts Only Becomes Clear When You Start Writing Detection Rules Yourself

A cybersecurity professional who spent years as a SOC analyst reviewing alerts before moving into detection engineering shares key insights on why alerts behave differently depending on perspective. The article explains the inherent trade-offs in tuning detection rules, the architectural reasons alerts often arrive without full context, and why default priorities rarely match any single organization's environment. It highlights how false positives are not simply developer errors but calculated risks between coverage and noise. The piece also stresses the value of feedback loops between SOC teams and detection developers to improve overall security effectiveness.