AntiMalware•July 16, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Google to Allow Competing Android App Stores Directly Inside Play Store After Epic Games Court Ruling

Google is set to open its official Google Play store to competing Android app marketplaces, allowing third-party catalogs to be distributed directly through the platform starting July 22. The move follows a court ruling in the multi-year antitrust case brought by Epic Games, which began in 2020 when Fortnite introduced direct V-Bucks purchases that bypassed Google’s 30% commission rules, leading to the game’s removal from both Google Play and the Apple App Store.

The court found that Google had systematically hindered device manufacturers from promoting or pre-installing alternative app stores, thereby strengthening its monopoly over Android app distribution. One of the key remedies requires Google to host approved competing stores inside Google Play itself. Attempts by Google and Epic to substitute this measure with a softer “Registered App Stores” program—under which users would still need to download rival stores manually—were rejected by the judge, who questioned whether such an approach would meaningfully increase competition.

Under the approved framework, participating stores will receive default access to the Google Play app catalog. Individual developers can still choose to prohibit distribution of their applications through specific marketplaces. Google will charge an annual verification fee of $5,000 per store. In return, approved stores must block malicious applications, respect copyright rules, and maintain the ability to update and remove apps. Any marketplace whose share of suspicious installations exceeds 1% may be removed from the program.

The changes are expected to apply primarily in the United States for now. Nevertheless, the ruling represents a significant shift for the Android ecosystem: Google Play will no longer merely tolerate competitors but will be required to actively distribute them to its users.

Related articles

Habr•Policy & Regulation

MinTsifry Proposes Requiring Telecom Operators to Install SORM Equipment Before Obtaining Licenses

The Russian Ministry of Digital Development plans to introduce legislation obligating telecom operators to deploy SORM surveillance systems prior to receiving operating licenses. Under the proposed rules, companies will only be permitted to begin serving subscribers after the equipment has been installed and handed over to law enforcement agencies. Non-compliance could result in license revocation through an extrajudicial administrative process. Current regulations allow operators to obtain licenses with a network diagram that merely indicates planned or existing SORM components. The change aims to close loopholes exploited by unscrupulous providers that repeatedly register new legal entities to operate without surveillance capabilities. Industry experts note that the minimum cost of a basic SORM complex starts at 5 million rubles, which could disproportionately affect smaller local providers without a transition period or scaled requirements.

Habr•Policy & Regulation

GOST R 57580 Compliance: Defining Assessment Scope to Verify Real Protection in Financial Organizations

Financial institutions often maintain extensive documentation on information security yet still fail GOST R 57580 assessments due to mismatches between documented processes and actual infrastructure. The standards GOST R 57580.1-2017 and GOST R 57580.2-2018 set distinct requirements for protection levels and evaluation methodology. Correct application begins with identifying the organization's regulatory category under Bank of Russia rules such as Regulation 851-P for credit institutions or Regulation 757-P for non-credit financial organizations. Defining the precise assessment boundary is critical, including systems, remote access channels, virtualization components, and third-party interactions. Organizations must also distinguish between the full assessment scope and the representative sample selected for verification. Evidence collection requires both policy review and technical confirmation that controls function as intended across the evaluated environment.

Habr•Policy & Regulation

Evaluating Secure Development Maturity: Comparing BSIMM, DSOMM, SAMM and GOST R 56939-2024

A detailed analysis compares four methodologies for self-assessing secure software development maturity in Russian companies. The review covers BSIMM from Black Duck, OWASP DSOMM, OWASP SAMM and the updated Russian national standard GOST R 56939-2024. Each model was tested through a simulated audit on a fictional company called ООО «Лиса и лосЬ» that uses GitLab, Nexus and SonarQube. The evaluation scored the methodologies on criteria including ease of maturity calculation, recommendation generation, roadmap building, heat-map creation and SDLC coverage. GOST R 56939-2024 and SAMM received the highest total scores of 35 and 34 out of 47. The article concludes that no single methodology covers all needs and recommends combining approaches tailored to specific company contexts.

Habr•Policy & Regulation

GlobalSign Launches New Wave of SSL/TLS Certificate Revocations Targeting Russian Organizations

GlobalSign has initiated another round of revocations affecting SSL/TLS certificates issued to Russian websites, with a total of 11,000 certificates withdrawn from 1,300 organizations so far. The revocations primarily impact entities listed in EU and US sanctions regimes, in line with updated CA/Browser Forum requirements that took effect in May 2026. Greek CA HARICA has also participated in the revocations, sometimes completing the process within seconds and leaving site owners little time to respond. The actions stem from mandatory checks against the OFAC SDN List, BIS Denied Persons List, and equivalent European sanctions databases. Russian authorities recommend obtaining domestic TLS certificates via Gosuslugi within three business days to maintain secure access in foreign browsers. Let's Encrypt has similarly updated its policies to restrict certificates for sanctioned Russian entities while continuing issuance for others.