AntiMalwareJuly 20, 2026🇷🇺Translated from Russian

VPN Services Stabilize in Russia? Expert Warns Users Not to Relax as New Blocks May Be Coming

Russians have recently observed that VPN services and anonymizers have begun working more reliably, yet experts urge caution and warn against celebrating any lasting victory.

Technical director Sergey Shcherbakov of the Russian company Stakhanovets stated that the current period of relative stability is most likely a technical pause rather than a sign of relaxed government control.

During spring and early summer, systems of deep packet inspection employed by internet providers blocked connections quite crudely by detecting digital fingerprints of protocols such as OpenVPN, WireGuard and others. This approach resulted in excessive false positives, interrupting even legitimate traffic and causing mass connection drops across the country.

Shcherbakov believes the blocking equipment is now being recalibrated. Operators are gathering intelligence on used ports, reconnection frequency, and traffic obfuscation methods in order to deploy more accurate and targeted filtering mechanisms in the near future.

At the same time, ordinary users have also improved their operational security. Many now keep several VPN clients installed, regularly switch between protocols and ports, and activate obfuscation features when necessary. When one service becomes unavailable, another can be launched quickly, reducing the perceived impact of individual blocks.

Nevertheless, a blocked protocol does not spontaneously recover, and Shcherbakov anticipates a new wave of restrictions by the end of summer or beginning of autumn.

Instead of complete connection terminations, providers may adopt a strategy of gradual throttling: reducing speeds during peak hours, introducing artificial delays when loading pages, and interfering with the transfer of large files. In such a scenario, a VPN connection may appear active while remaining practically unusable for most everyday tasks.

Related articles

HabrPrivacy & Surveillance

What Makes a Quality Anti-Detect Browser and Why Aurorium Built Its Own Solution

Aurorium explains the current state of the anti-detect browser market and why most existing tools fall short for professional use. The company highlights that true anti-detect browsers must modify browser fingerprints at the kernel level rather than relying on JavaScript injections. It details how solutions like incognito mode, virtual machines, and browser extensions fail to provide proper isolation and spoofing. Aurorium emphasizes its own approach of modifying Blink and V8 engines directly in C++ to create consistent, undetectable profiles. The article also covers legitimate use cases including QA testing, OSINT research, SEO monitoring, and secure web scraping. Advanced fingerprinting techniques such as Canvas and WebGL noise injection are explained alongside methods to detect superficial spoofing attempts.

AntiMalwarePrivacy & Surveillance

LG Monitors Automatically Install McAfee App via Windows Update Without User Consent

Home users of Microsoft Windows have discovered that certain LG monitors automatically install companion software upon connection to a PC, followed by prompts to try a trial version of McAfee antivirus. The installation occurs through the standard Windows driver and software delivery mechanism without providing a clear, separate confirmation dialog. The LG Monitor App Installer requests broad access to system resources, raising concerns even though the application itself is not classified as malicious. YouTube channel Gamers Nexus identified the behavior across both new monitors and models released approximately three years ago, including units previously used in office environments. Manufacturers commonly supply utilities for display calibration, firmware updates, and monitor management, yet the process becomes problematic when it serves as an entry point for optional software and advertising. Users are advised to review installed applications and remove unnecessary LG utilities, while organizations should monitor automatic software deployment after connecting peripherals. Neither LG nor Microsoft has commented on the issue at the time of publication.

HabrPrivacy & Surveillance

Mimolet Dating App Shows Strong Data Protection Practices in Photo Handling, Moderation, and Infrastructure Review

A detailed technical review of the Russian dating service Mimolet reveals several well-implemented security and privacy measures across its photo upload pipeline, content moderation systems, and infrastructure choices. The app processes every uploaded image by validating its actual content rather than file extension, strips EXIF metadata, resizes it, and stores only the cleaned version. Public images undergo pre-publication checks using two AI models plus an additional verification pass before they appear in group chats or profiles. Complaints and blocks are available to all users without requiring a subscription, and moderator decisions are logged for accountability. The core API and database run in Russia while media files are stored in a domestic S3-compatible object storage, and the main AI features operate on dedicated GPU infrastructure managed by the team. The review highlights two areas needing improvement: clearer data retention timelines and a dedicated, trackable appeals process for blocked accounts.

HabrPrivacy & Surveillance

Mimolet Dating App Review Highlights Privacy Protections, AI Moderation, and UX Trade-Offs in Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive review of the Mimolet dating application examines its registration process, vertical profile feed, free filters, and advanced communication tools including built-in calls and AI-assisted messaging. The analysis praises detailed profiles visible directly in the feed, free access to comprehensive search criteria, and strong privacy measures such as automatic EXIF metadata removal from photos and primary data storage within Russian server infrastructure. It also covers public interest-based groups, pre-publication image moderation using multiple AI checks, and transparent complaint handling that does not require a subscription. Concerns are raised about lengthy registration potentially reducing user completion rates, the inclusion of weight as a searchable filter, unclear data retention timelines, and the lack of a formal appeals process for blocked accounts. The app offers three paid tiers focused on visibility and extra AI features while keeping core communication and moderation tools free, with approximately 200,000 registrations and 15,000 daily active users reported alongside retention rates of 44.96% at day three and 19.11% at day thirty.