Walk In, You've Been Recognized: The Evolution of Identification Technologies in Modern Access Control Systems
PERCo has released a new line of readers supporting Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), accompanying mobile applications, and a joint facial identification solution developed with the CRТ group. These additions to the PERCo-Web access control platform offer a timely occasion to review how identification technologies in physical access control systems (СКУД) have evolved over recent years.
Access control systems have always followed the same core principle: a person possesses an identifier, presents it, and the system decides whether to grant entry. Earlier, this identifier was a paper pass checked by a guard who could also perform verification by comparing the visitor’s face with a photograph. Modern systems distribute this work across readers, controllers, and actuators while preserving the same logical sequence.
Proximity and MIFARE Cards as the Enduring Foundation
The first truly mass-market contactless cards operated at 125 kHz (proximity cards). Their simplicity and low cost turned access control from a specialized solution into a mainstream product used in offices, business centers, and educational institutions. The next generation, MIFARE smart cards, introduced protected memory and cryptographic authentication mechanisms originally developed for public transport. Today, cards are divided into two classes: those carrying only a factory identifier and those with cryptographically protected memory. Multi-format readers allow organizations to migrate gradually from legacy cards to protected ones without replacing the entire infrastructure at once.
QR Codes: Convenience for Temporary Access
QR codes gained popularity with the spread of smartphones because the phone’s camera and screen can serve as both reader and transmitter. They excel at issuing temporary passes for visitors, contractors, or parking lots without requiring physical cards or installed applications. Their main limitation is easy duplication, making them unsuitable for scenarios demanding strict identification.
NFC and BLE: Expanding Contactless Capabilities
NFC works well with existing MIFARE infrastructure, allowing NFC-enabled phones and bank cards to function as identifiers. However, platform restrictions on iOS and uneven NFC hardware support on low-cost Android devices have limited its universal adoption. BLE overcomes many of these constraints. It operates over several meters, supports “hands-free” passage, and lets installers adjust detection range via signal threshold settings. BLE also enables wireless configuration, firmware updates, and diagnostics of readers without physical connections.
Biometrics and Regulatory Transformation
Biometric methods—fingerprints, palm vein patterns, and face—offer the advantage that credentials cannot be transferred. Facial recognition, however, now operates under strict Russian regulation. Federal Law 572-FZ requires that facial biometric processing use either the state Unified Biometric System (EBS) or accredited commercial biometric systems (KBS). These platforms perform liveness detection and authentication before returning a standard digital identifier to the access controller. As a result, facial biometrics has shifted from a convenience feature to a regulated “technology of trust” primarily justified by compliance needs, such as construction site access in Moscow or critical infrastructure protection. Alternative identification methods must remain available for individuals who have not consented to biometric processing.
The overarching conclusion is that the oldest and simplest technology—identification by access card—continues to serve as the reliable foundation of most systems, while newer methods occupy specialized roles shaped by security, usability, and regulatory demands.
Related articles
VK Files Lawsuit in EU Court Seeking to Overturn Sanctions Imposed in July
Russian internet company VK has submitted a formal challenge to the European Union's sanctions regime by filing a case with the Court of Justice of the European Union. The company argues that the restrictions placed on VK and its subsidiary Communication Platform LLC are both unjustified and unlawful. The lawsuit, registered under case number T-664/26 on 7 October, directly contests the July sanctions that targeted the developer of the MAX messenger. Earlier restrictions had already led to the removal of multiple VK ecosystem applications from Apple App Store and Google Play, forcing users toward alternative distribution channels such as RuStore, Huawei AppGallery, Samsung Galaxy Store and Xiaomi GetApps. While installed Android applications continue to function and receive updates, iOS users face disrupted push notifications after the apps were delisted. The legal action itself does not automatically restore app availability in the affected stores.
VPN Rules in Russia 2026: No Fine for Ordinary Users but Strict Penalties for Advertising and Extremist Content Access
As of September 2026, Russia maintains no separate administrative fine for ordinary citizens simply connecting to a VPN service. Responsibility arises only for specific actions such as deliberately searching for known extremist materials, advertising tools to bypass restrictions, or failing to comply with Roskomnadzor demands as a service operator. Corporate VPNs used for remote access to company networks remain fully legal under exceptions in Article 15.8 of Law No. 149-FZ. New provisions in the Code of Administrative Offenses, including Articles 13.53, 13.52 and 14.3 introduced by Laws 281-FZ and 282-FZ, impose fines ranging from 3,000 to 500,000 rubles depending on the violation and the offender category. The rules distinguish clearly between end users, service owners and advertisers. VPN technology itself is not banned, yet public services face ongoing blocking and operators must integrate with state filtering systems. The material reflects the regulatory situation on 24 September 2026.
Troubleshooting Erroneous TSPU Blocks: How Admins Can Collaborate with Russian Regulators
A Moneta client outage traced back to erroneous filtering on Russia's TSPU system rather than internal infrastructure or DDoS protection. Engineers used curl, traceroute, nping, and custom Python scripts to confirm TCP payload-based blocking after the handshake. The team submitted a request via the VTS personal account, received partial acceptance status, then escalated to DCOA and SSOP to obtain the specific TSPU site number. Detailed network traces and active traffic were required for diagnostics. The case highlights coordination challenges between operators, DCOA, and SSOP when erroneous blocks occur on information resources.
Security Vision Unveils Self-Assessment Portal for Unified Information Security Evaluation Across Corporate Holdings
Security Vision has launched a new Self-Assessment portal designed to consolidate information security self-evaluations for entire corporate groups and holdings. The platform addresses common challenges where subsidiaries maintain inconsistent compliance records, with some requirements fulfilled while others remain unresolved for years in scattered emails and spreadsheets. Security Vision SA covers the complete workflow from defining requirements and distributing questionnaires to calculating results and tracking remediation actions. Parent organizations gain a consolidated view of subsidiary compliance status along with detailed breakdowns by individual systems. The system supports requirement templates, version control, scheduled assessments, automated metric-based answers, and conversion of gaps into actionable plans with assigned owners and deadlines. Additional features include internal policy document management and interactive dashboards for analysis. The first public demonstration is scheduled for the SOC Forum on October 27-28.