AntiMalwareJuly 23, 2026🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Scammers Impersonate Russian Post to Lure Victims into Fake Telegram Bots

Fraudsters have developed a new scheme targeting Russian citizens by impersonating Russian Post over the phone. They claim that a registered letter or parcel requires additional address details and direct victims to a counterfeit Telegram bot.

The bot then requests personal information, bank card data, or SMS verification codes. State Duma deputy Anton Nemkin highlighted how the criminals exploit trust in the well-known postal service and create urgency around expected deliveries.

Victims are advised to avoid any links or contacts provided by callers and instead verify information directly through official Russian Post channels. The scheme relies on automatic reactions from people who may be expecting packages, making them more likely to follow instructions without suspicion.

No actual parcel exists, but the risk of account takeover or financial loss remains very real. Anton Nemkin urged citizens never to share SMS codes, card details, or move conversations to third-party chatbots when contacted unexpectedly.

Related articles

AntiMalwareFraud & Social Engineering

From Free Game Cheats to Arson: Cybercriminals Recruit Children for Espionage and Violent Crimes

Cybercriminals are increasingly targeting children not only to steal money from parents but also to turn them into unwitting accomplices in dangerous criminal activities. During school holidays, teenagers spend more time in games and messengers where scammers offer free in-game currency, mods, cheats, and pirated game versions to build trust. Once access is gained, fraudsters extract SMS codes, bank card details, or device control, escalating to threats and blackmail when initial tactics fail. Kaspersky Lab recorded over 19 million attempts to distribute malware disguised as popular games between April 2024 and April 2025, installing spyware and RAT trojans that monitor chats, keystrokes, cameras, and microphones. In severe cases, children are manipulated into believing they assist law enforcement, leading to real-world crimes such as photographing apartments, handing over keys, setting fires, or attacking people. Specific incidents include a 12-year-old boy from Leningrad Oblast forced to assault a police officer and a 13-year-old from Podolsk ordered to ignite a gas pump at a filling station. Izvestia reporting highlights that parents should watch for signs like hidden screens or strange tasks and teach children that no stranger can demand codes, money, or secret missions.

AntiMalwareFraud & Social Engineering

Google Quietly Rolls Out Android Developer Verifier App to Curb APK Sideloading Fraud

Android users are discovering a new system application called Android Developer Verifier with the package identifier com.google.android.verifier that Google installs automatically through system updates without any separate consent prompt. The service prepares devices for upcoming restrictions on installing APK files from unknown sources by checking whether an app is registered to a verified developer who has passed identity verification and supplied legal information to Google. This verification does not guarantee an application is safe but allows Google to associate it with a specific individual or company, helping combat social-engineering scams in which fraudsters pressure victims into disabling protections and installing malicious APKs. To install software from an unverified developer, users will need to enable developer mode, confirm they are not under duress, reboot the device, wait 24 hours, and re-authenticate with PIN or biometrics. The new requirements begin on 30 September in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand, with worldwide expansion planned for 2027 and later. While the app can currently be removed, it is unclear whether future updates will restore it, and advanced users retain the option to sideload via ADB, which bypasses the new checks entirely.

SecuritylabFraud & Social Engineering

Protecting Your Credit History: How to Check for Unauthorized Microloans and Set Up Self-Bans in Russia

Russians often discover fraudulent loans taken out in their name only when banks reject their applications, revealing unknown debts in their credit reports. The article explains how to obtain a list of credit bureaus via Gosuslugi or the Central Bank of Russia, download free reports twice a year from each BKI, and thoroughly review contracts, applications, and creditor inquiries rather than focusing solely on credit scores. It details the new self-ban mechanism available from March 2025 on Gosuslugi and September 2025 via MFC, which blocks remote lending while allowing exceptions for mortgages and education loans. Practical advice covers pre-travel preparations, immediate actions after losing documents or phones, and the step-by-step process of disputing fraudulent entries with creditors, police, and the Central Bank. The guide also includes a table of common red flags and a checklist of ongoing security habits to prevent identity theft and financial fraud.

SecuritylabFraud & Social Engineering

Aurorium Anti-Detect Browser Uses AI Fingerprinting Linked to Real Hardware and User Profiles to Evade Modern Anti-Fraud Systems

Aurorium is an anti-detect browser that differentiates itself from competitors by embedding spoofing directly into the browser kernel rather than relying on JavaScript patches. The product generates fingerprints using AI that analyzes the operator’s actual device hardware and matches it to a realistic social profile including age, income, occupation, and geography. Network routing is handled at the kernel level so that WebRTC and DNS traffic is forced through proxies without disabling features that anti-fraud systems flag. The company also published a detailed Cure53 security audit that identified and subsequently fixed four critical vulnerabilities. Team-oriented features include built-in CRM, task management, multi-team support, and a mobile application. The review highlights that Aurorium’s approach reduces the common mismatch between generated fingerprints and the supposed user’s real-world context that often triggers detection.