HackerSec Launches AI-Native Pentest Platform with Yaga Agent for Automated Offensive Testing
HackerSec, an offensive cybersecurity company, has launched a major update to its pentest platform featuring a new Pentest AI-Native technology. In this model, an AI agent takes over complete execution of offensive tests while human specialists only monitor the operation and validate each vulnerability.
The platform performs reconnaissance, enumeration, validations, exploitations, impact confirmation, and evidence production autonomously. Cybercriminals are already deploying AI agents to automate reconnaissance, identify vulnerabilities, and scale offensive campaigns. At the same time, organizations across sectors accelerate development with AI, producing more updates, more production code, and a constantly expanding attack surface that requires pentesting to keep pace.
In the AI-Native model, the intelligence receives the scope, investigates the environment, interprets system responses, formulates hypotheses, and adapts its strategy based on results. The agent maintains full operational context and continues exploring different paths until confirming whether a vulnerability is truly exploitable, enabling complete, continuous testing with reduced human intervention.
At the center of the platform is Yaga, the pentest agent developed from scratch by HackerSec. The technology uses a proprietary harness that coordinates tools, playbooks, multiple analysis stages, and different AI models during the same execution. Instead of depending on the reasoning of a single model, Yaga combines distinct capabilities to interpret the target, select techniques, execute authorized attacks, and technically validate findings.
Results published on YagaBench demonstrate the impact of this multi-model architecture. The production configuration of Yaga, operating with four combined models, solved 91.2% of black box scenarios, 94.6% of gray box scenarios, and 93.5% of white box scenarios. This performance highlights that the platform's advantage lies in the proprietary offensive orchestration layer developed by HackerSec.
“Our goal is to achieve, by the end of the year, more than 98% effectiveness in all AI-Native pentests with Yaga,” commented Andrew Martinez, CEO of HackerSec. New cyber environments change at a speed that no longer matches point-in-time pentests, long cycles, and high dependence on manual execution. The AI-Native model allows companies to perform offensive testing more frequently, expand coverage, and reduce the time between vulnerability emergence and identification while keeping human experts responsible for monitoring and technical validation.
Related articles
Why We Banned Our AI Manager from Writing Code and Assigned the Task to Claude Opus
The team behind an AI-powered marketplace manager for Wildberries initially built the system using regular updates, then migrated it to an autonomous agent. After implementing multiple layers of restrictions, they ultimately removed the agent entirely and rebuilt the solution from scratch. The new architecture relies on a single tool that handles the complete Wildberries API along with internet access while respecting all platform limits. The decision to prohibit the original AI manager from generating code stemmed from concerns over reliability and security in production environments. Instead, the developers turned to Claude Opus to handle coding tasks. This case highlights practical challenges of deploying AI agents in e-commerce automation and information security contexts.
Developer Builds MCP Linter and Discovers Security Issues in Anthropic Official Servers
A developer has released mcp-linter, a lightweight security and compliance tool for the Model Context Protocol used by Anthropic's Claude ecosystem. The linter detects critical problems such as stdout pollution that breaks JSON-RPC framing, missing destructiveHint annotations that allow autonomous agents to execute dangerous actions without human confirmation, prompt injection vectors hidden inside tool descriptions, and incomplete input schemas that increase model hallucinations. When run against Anthropic's reference servers, the tool assigned low health scores to server-memory and especially server-filesystem, highlighting dozens of parameters lacking descriptions. The utility runs with zero dependencies, supports SARIF output for GitHub Security, and can generate automatic JSON patches. The project is open source under MIT license and already integrates into CI pipelines via a dedicated GitHub Action.
Pentesting AI Components: Key Vulnerabilities CISOs Must Address in RAG and AI Agents
The article examines how AI integration into corporate systems dramatically expands the attack surface beyond traditional web application testing. It details risks associated with chatbots, RAG-enabled systems that pull from internal documents, and autonomous AI agents capable of executing real actions via APIs. Yuri Grishaev, an OSCP+ certified specialist and top Standoff 365 hacker, explains how prompt injection can bypass access controls and lead to data leaks or unauthorized operations. The piece stresses that service accounts often hold broad privileges, allowing AI components to serve as indirect paths to sensitive data even when direct user access is restricted. It also covers how AI-generated output can trigger classic vulnerabilities such as XSS if not properly sanitized. Recommendations include inventorying all AI tools, enforcing least-privilege principles, and validating user permissions before any model processes or acts on retrieved content. ABP2B provides free checklists and policy templates to help organizations prepare for secure AI adoption.
Local LLMs Enable Scams by Drafting Fraudulent Replies Without Warnings
Tests on consumer hardware showed that popular 7-8B local models almost never flagged classic advance-fee schemes when asked to draft replies instead of detecting fraud. The author ran 42 scam scenarios across Russian, Kazakh and mixed language on Llama 3.1 8B, Qwen 2.5 7B and DeepSeek-R1 8B using only an RTX 5050 laptop and Ollama. Without additional controls the models produced ready-to-send messages agreeing to prepaid transfers to unknown Kaspi Gold numbers in nearly every case. Introduction of the MoneyGate layer, which combines a mandate check, a separate judge model and hard-coded red-flag rules, blocked all 42 malicious requests while still allowing most legitimate payments to proceed. The benchmark KZ Scam Shield covering 12 Kazakhstan-specific fraud patterns remains publicly available for further testing.