AntiMalware•July 24, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Sberbank to Terminate Currency and Multicurrency Visa Cards from September 2026 Despite Prior Extensions to 2030

Sberbank will stop servicing currency and multicurrency Visa cards from 1 September 2026, according to an SMS notification sent to clients. The measure affects even those cards whose expiration dates had previously been extended until 2030.

The bank recommended that customers close the affected cards in advance and transfer any remaining funds to other accounts. Cardholders can complete the closure process through the Sberbank Online mobile application by navigating to the card management section, selecting the relevant card, and initiating the closure procedure. Clients who do not use the app must visit a bank branch in person.

Early closure is intended to help customers retain access to their funds and prevent potential delays after the September 2026 deadline. The move also allows Sberbank to avoid long queues of customers holding suddenly obsolete plastic cards.

The decision forms part of the broader withdrawal of Visa and Mastercard from Russian circulation amid sanctions and import-substitution efforts. In early July, Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina stated that the process is continuing, although the regulator has not yet set a final deadline for abandoning international cards.

In May, Alla Bakina, Director of the National Payment System Department at the Central Bank, indicated that Visa and Mastercard must leave the Russian market. Since the payment systems departed, their cards have lost previous functionality, while the National System of Payment Cards continues to spend resources on their maintenance.

Over the past four to five years, the combined share of Visa and Mastercard in Russia has fallen below 17 percent. Banks are replacing them primarily with Mir cards, and the National System of Payment Cards is using economic incentives to phase out legacy plastic.

Related articles

Habr•Policy & Regulation

Passphrases vs. Leetspeak Passwords: Why Four Random Words Outperform P@ssw0rd!2026

The article explains why a passphrase made of four randomly selected words provides far greater resistance to offline attacks than a complex-looking password constructed with substitutions and appended symbols. It details how password strength is measured in bits of entropy rather than visual complexity, showing that four words drawn from a 50,000-word list yield approximately 62 bits while common leetspeak transformations add almost none. The piece contrasts fast legacy hashing with modern slow algorithms such as Argon2 and emphasizes the protective effect of per-password salting. It criticizes registration forms that reward predictable patterns and highlights NIST guidance favoring length over mandatory character rotation. The author recommends diceware-style generation for master passwords and password managers for everything else, noting that passkeys ultimately eliminate the need for memorizable secrets altogether.

Habr•Policy & Regulation

Building the Foundation of Digital Trust: Why Identity Security Remains Undervalued

Identity Security is presented as one of the most underestimated pillars of cybersecurity because granting access involves trusting individuals with sensitive information and systems. The article examines the deep intersection of IT and security functions, the costs of manual access errors, and the need to align business processes with technical controls. It references a 2026 Identity Conf study showing 43.5% of organizations experienced errors in manual rights assignment and 33.5% left access for former employees. Recommendations draw on NIST Human-Centered Cybersecurity concepts, SP 800-53, and Russian FSTEC Order No. 117 to design lifecycle processes covering account provisioning, privilege reviews, and continuous monitoring. Models such as RBAC and ABAC are discussed alongside IGA and IdM solutions to ensure business permissions map correctly to application rights. The piece stresses that successful projects require joint IT and security efforts from the initial survey through pilot and acceptance phases while measuring both risk reduction and operational efficiency.

AntiMalware•Policy & Regulation

VK Files Lawsuit in EU Court Seeking to Overturn Sanctions Imposed in July

Russian internet company VK has submitted a formal challenge to the European Union's sanctions regime by filing a case with the Court of Justice of the European Union. The company argues that the restrictions placed on VK and its subsidiary Communication Platform LLC are both unjustified and unlawful. The lawsuit, registered under case number T-664/26 on 7 October, directly contests the July sanctions that targeted the developer of the MAX messenger. Earlier restrictions had already led to the removal of multiple VK ecosystem applications from Apple App Store and Google Play, forcing users toward alternative distribution channels such as RuStore, Huawei AppGallery, Samsung Galaxy Store and Xiaomi GetApps. While installed Android applications continue to function and receive updates, iOS users face disrupted push notifications after the apps were delisted. The legal action itself does not automatically restore app availability in the affected stores.

Securitylab•Policy & Regulation

VPN Rules in Russia 2026: No Fine for Ordinary Users but Strict Penalties for Advertising and Extremist Content Access

As of September 2026, Russia maintains no separate administrative fine for ordinary citizens simply connecting to a VPN service. Responsibility arises only for specific actions such as deliberately searching for known extremist materials, advertising tools to bypass restrictions, or failing to comply with Roskomnadzor demands as a service operator. Corporate VPNs used for remote access to company networks remain fully legal under exceptions in Article 15.8 of Law No. 149-FZ. New provisions in the Code of Administrative Offenses, including Articles 13.53, 13.52 and 14.3 introduced by Laws 281-FZ and 282-FZ, impose fines ranging from 3,000 to 500,000 rubles depending on the violation and the offender category. The rules distinguish clearly between end users, service owners and advertisers. VPN technology itself is not banned, yet public services face ongoing blocking and operators must integrate with state filtering systems. The material reflects the regulatory situation on 24 September 2026.