Building Information Security Culture: How Welcome Training Turned Rules into Engaging Dialogue
A large software company has shared how it replaced dry policy documents with an interactive Welcome Training program to build genuine information security culture among its staff.
The organization already deploys advanced controls such as access restrictions, security policies, an SIEM system, and antivirus solutions. However, these tools proved ineffective when employees lacked basic understanding of why rules exist and what consequences follow from violations.
What did not work
Signing a policy document during onboarding proved insufficient, as staff rarely retained the content. Posting rules on the corporate portal also failed to drive compliance, since no verification mechanism existed.
The target audience consists of developers, analysts, testers, product managers, and designers. While these professionals often master complex product security technologies, many still store passwords in Google Sheets, showing that technical skill does not automatically translate into security culture.
Welcome Training structure
The company therefore introduced 45-minute in-person sessions limited to groups of 7–10 people. The format encourages questions and discussion. The curriculum includes:
- Current threat landscape with examples of major Russian incidents
- Step-by-step attack mechanics to illustrate individual impact
- Assets under protection, including code, data channels, and personal information
- Consequences of sharing credentials or personal data
- Password requirements and use of corporate password managers
- Proper use of corporate email
- Storing sensitive data on encrypted volumes with VeraCrypt
- Secure credential transfer using the pbin service
- File checking via VirusTotal and antivirus tools
- Recognition and response to social engineering
- Signs of workstation compromise and reporting procedures
- Overview of deployed corporate protections such as Kaspersky Endpoint Security, Kaspersky Secure Mail Gateway, and SIEM
Results include higher engagement, better retention, increased awareness of personal responsibility, and a measurable drop in human-factor incidents.
Related articles
Peter Levashov Accused of FBI Collaboration and Running XSS Honeypot Forum After Kelihos Sentence
Russian spammer and botnet operator Petr Levashov, known online as Petr Severa, was arrested in Barcelona in 2017 and later pleaded guilty to running the Storm, Waledac and Kelihos botnets. He received a lenient sentence of under three years despite prosecutors seeking 14.5 years, which experts attribute to possible cooperation with the FBI. After release, Levashov remained in the United States while remaining wanted in Russia. Forum users bratva and stallman on XSS.mx and Exploit.in have been linked to Levashov through stylistic analysis and shared references to the Telegram channel Dark News admin nicknamed golub. Stallman, identified as the final administrator of the RAMP4u forum, openly purchased access to U.S. critical infrastructure including power grids, water systems and hospitals while moderators allegedly suppressed competing posts. Observers including researcher Olga Kuprina suggest these accounts operated under agreements with U.S. authorities, allowing forums to function as intelligence-gathering platforms rather than purely criminal marketplaces.
Russian Cybersecurity Market Set to Hit 455 Billion Rubles by 2026 as Talent Shortage Persists
MWS Cloud forecasts that the Russian information security market will grow 20.8 percent to reach 455.4 billion rubles in 2026. The largest segment will be software at 216.5 billion rubles, followed by services at 167 billion and hardware at 71.9 billion rubles. Demand is increasingly driven by sophisticated attacks, regulatory requirements and fines rather than import substitution alone. BI.ZONE offers a more conservative estimate of 10-15 percent annual growth. Managed security services such as monitoring, incident response and vulnerability management are leading the services segment because few organizations can maintain 24/7 in-house teams. Director Artem Gribkov of Angara MTDR estimates the personnel deficit at approximately 40 percent, especially at middle and senior levels.
Russian Internet Users Report Growing Access Restrictions as Certificate Revocations Affect 39 Percent of Respondents
A recent telephone survey conducted by Russian Field between September 23 and 30, 2026, among 1,600 participants representative by gender, age, federal districts, and settlement types shows that 39 percent of Russian internet users have noticed restrictions or complications when trying to access websites. When sites fail to open due to certificate problems, 26 percent of respondents said they would simply stop visiting the resource. The findings, published by Kod.ru, also indicate that 57 percent of users are aware that Russian websites may not load in certain browsers because of revoked foreign certificates. In response to certificate errors, 55 percent would switch browsers, 22 percent would install the required certificates, and 21 percent would try accessing the site from a mobile device. Younger users are more inclined to use VPNs or proxies, while older respondents more often choose to abandon the site. Overall, 77 percent of those surveyed expect further changes to the Russian internet segment, with only 9 percent believing it will remain unchanged.
CISA and NSA Urge Shift to Memory-Safe Languages Like Rust to Eliminate Memory Vulnerabilities
Official reports from CISA, NSA, FBI and partners highlight that decades of safe coding practices and code analysis tools have failed to resolve memory safety issues in languages such as C and C++. Government documents cite statistics showing that 70-75% of exploited vulnerabilities and zero-days stem from memory errors, including data from Microsoft, Google Chromium, Mozilla and Project Zero. Google reports that Rust adoption in Android reduced memory-related vulnerabilities below 20% in 2025, with a 1000-fold lower vulnerability density compared to C++. The analysis details Rust's ownership, borrowing and move semantics that provide compile-time guarantees unavailable in C++, enabling stronger compiler optimizations. Reports also acknowledge migration challenges including learning curves, interop issues and ecosystem gaps, while noting ongoing C++ safety improvements targeted for C++26 and C++29. Major organizations including Microsoft, Amazon and Google are already committing to Rust for critical new code.