Russia Drafts Rules Letting Users Choose AI Assistant at Smartphone First Boot
The Russian Ministry of Digital Development has prepared a draft government resolution that would let users choose their system AI assistant when first activating a smartphone. The proposal, now open for public discussion, replaces the current narrow category of voice assistant with the wider term system assistant.
Under the draft, a system assistant is an AI program that interacts with the device, operating system, and installed applications through voice, text, and visual commands. At initial setup, users would be presented with a list of available solutions and could select one or refuse installation entirely. No specific company, service, or platform is mandated.
The chosen assistant must receive the same treatment as any pre-installed solution from the device manufacturer or operating system vendor. This includes regular updates, support for user settings, and equal visibility in the interface. The pre-installed version must remain free of charge and must not disappear after software updates or a factory reset.
The changes would also affect the list of pre-installed search services, allowing inclusion of solutions that incorporate artificial intelligence technologies. Ministry officials argue the measure will strengthen competition between Russian and foreign platforms and ensure continued access to modern AI services even if individual foreign products encounter regulatory restrictions.
The core principle of the draft is straightforward: device manufacturers would no longer unilaterally decide which AI assistant is installed. The final choice would rest with the device owner.
Related articles
How to Complete the Roskomnadzor Personal Data Notification Form in 2026: Field-by-Field Analysis
The article provides a detailed walkthrough of the current Roskomnadzor notification form for operators processing personal data under Russian law. It explains that the form is an extract from existing internal documents rather than a questionnaire, requiring operators to reference their data processing policy, inventory results, appointment orders, and protection level acts. Key prerequisites include confirming that notification is mandatory after the 2022 amendments removed most exemptions, preparing five core documents, and understanding that the form pulls data directly from those records. The guide covers every section, from operator identification and processing regions to data categories, protection measures, geography, and post-submission obligations. It also addresses common mistakes, the option to save drafts, auto-population features, and liability for non-compliance or inaccurate information. The piece concludes with a checklist mapping each form field to its source document.
OBEP Raids on Russian IT Firms: How to Safeguard Source Code, Servers and Blockchain Assets During Searches
Russian IT companies, Web3 projects and fintech services now face frequent visits from OBEP operatives conducting pre-investigative checks or searches under criminal cases. The article details the legal distinction between operational-search measures and formal searches, emphasizing article 164.1 of the UPK RF that prohibits seizure of physical servers in economic crime investigations. It explains how companies can demand data mirroring instead of hardware removal and how to invoke article 51 of the RF Constitution when pressured for encryption keys. Commercial secret regimes are presented as a tool to raise criminal liability for leaks and to request closed court proceedings. Practical checklists cover document verification, staff instructions, password retention and immediate calls to specialized criminal counsel. The guidance aims to prevent business paralysis while preserving evidence integrity during raids.
RWB Deploys Enterprise-Wide Database Access Control with Trino and Open Policy Agent
RWB has replaced fragmented manual database access processes with a centralized architecture built on Trino as the single entry point and Open Policy Agent for policy enforcement. The system enforces least-privilege access, mandatory auditing, and automated revocation tied to HR records while eliminating anonymous and password-based logins. Access requests now complete in 3–10 minutes instead of an average of four days, with 92 percent handled automatically. Key components include Keycloak for OIDC authentication, Vault for secrets, Kafka for security event streaming to SOC, and Kubernetes orchestration. Responsibility is split across AI & Data Security, Core DevOps, Access Management, SOC, and Trust & Safety teams. More than 1,250 PostgreSQL clusters and 90 projects are now connected, with real-time dashboards tracking adoption and policy health.
Russia Moves to Allow Biometric Data Processing for Suspects and Convicts Without Consent
Russian law enforcement agencies may soon gain the legal right to process biometric data of suspects, accused individuals, and convicted persons without requiring their personal consent. A corresponding draft bill has already been submitted to the government and is scheduled for review at the next cabinet meeting, according to TASS. The measure covers fingerprints, facial images, voice recordings, and other physiological or behavioral characteristics used for identification. If approved, prior permission from the individual will no longer be needed when biometrics are used in criminal proceedings. The change applies not only to those already convicted but also to suspects and accused persons whose guilt has not yet been established by a court. For ordinary citizens, enrollment in the Unified Biometric System remains voluntary and is used for remote identity verification when accessing financial and government services.