InfoWatch Details ARMA Wall NGFW Development for Industrial Systems Under Russian Import Substitution Rules
InfoWatch has released the second installment of its technical interview series covering the development of ARMA Wall, the company’s next-generation firewall designed specifically for industrial automation and critical infrastructure networks.
The discussion addresses the use of artificial intelligence, migration challenges from foreign vendors, reliance on Russian hardware, certification processes, and the rationale for choosing NGFW technology over data diodes in OT environments.
Engineers confirmed that all data processing occurs on-premise. No cloud services or third-party agents are used because customer security policies and certification requirements explicitly prohibit such approaches. Internal AI agents are also avoided; only limited research-oriented services assist with vulnerability discovery and configuration analysis, with final decisions always made by human engineers.
The product incorporates both proprietary detection models and a curated mix of external threat feeds. Signatures are continuously optimized for performance while legacy rules remain active, including those protecting against exploits targeting Siemens controllers discovered in the 2000s.
Migration from foreign NGFW solutions is supported through detailed pre-project surveys that capture existing security policies. Automatic migration tools are planned but not yet implemented; manual configuration by experienced engineers is currently preferred to preserve context-specific filtering rules.
Regarding import substitution, InfoWatch noted that border firewalls have largely moved to domestic platforms in line with regulator requirements. However, full replacement inside ICS remains gradual because the typical lifecycle of industrial control systems is approximately 15 years. The company is deepening integration with Russian SCADA and controller vendors to enable native NGFW deployment within these long-lived environments.
Certified builds maintain fixed checksums, yet the regulator permits rapid updates for critical vulnerabilities without invalidating the certificate. This capability proved essential as the threat landscape evolved dramatically between the 2021 certification of the earlier Industrial Firewall product and 2026.
Detection feeds are delivered both online and offline for air-gapped networks. Administrators can also import indicators of compromise directly from NKCKI regulator letters; the system parses these indicators and automatically incorporates them into IDPS rules.
All development is performed by an internal team. Every component undergoes static and dynamic analysis before security specialists approve release. The company is implementing secure software development lifecycle processes and is preparing for relevant certification. Even embedded modules from other Russian vendors are tested to ensure they cannot become single points of compromise.
Testing of Russian processors such as Baikal has been completed, although production deployments still rely on imported platforms. Hardware is supplied through Kraftway, a state corporation subsidiary, with an average lead time of 60 days.
The product originated from industrial security requirements identified between 2017 and 2019. Its first commercial release, Industrial Firewall, targeted scenarios where foreign solutions from Hirschmann, Moxa, and Cisco were tightly coupled to specific verticals. ARMA Wall aims to provide unified protection across petrochemical, energy, and mining sectors while emphasizing security of critical information infrastructure over maximum throughput.
Deep packet inspection covers both legacy and modern industrial protocols, enabling command-level filtering at boundaries between corporate and OT networks as well as inside SCADA and PLC segments. In 2022 the solution blocked an attempt to deactivate licenses on Siemens controllers at a major Russian industrial site, preventing a full production stoppage.
Compared with data diodes, ARMA Wall offers lower total cost of ownership while providing equivalent one-way traffic enforcement plus bidirectional command inspection when needed. Virtual contexts are planned but not yet available; current segmentation requires multiple appliances. A KVM virtual machine image exists, and support for domestic hypervisors is in progress.
Pricing is influenced by hardware costs and the degree of import substitution. Reference deployments include the certified installation at RKK Energia (Roscosmos). The product integrates with third-party sandboxes and antivirus solutions using open protocols rather than attempting to create a closed ecosystem.
Pilot programs typically last one month, with equipment provided for up to three months. The recommended process includes two weeks of passive traffic analysis, two weeks of testing on an isolated segment, and two weeks of scaled rollout across the infrastructure.
Related articles
Rethinking SSO: Centralized User Data Provision and Authorization Processing in Corporate Systems
The article examines Single Sign-On systems not merely as authentication gateways but as architectural hubs for delivering user attributes and executing additional authorization logic. It highlights how SSO can aggregate data from sources like Active Directory, HR systems, and IDM platforms, then deliver it via OIDC claims to downstream applications. The discussion covers the shift from fragmented integrations across dozens of apps to a single trusted enforcement point using standards such as aggregated and distributed claims. It also explores the authorization pipeline where SSO acts as a Policy Enforcement Point querying external Policy Decision Points via the AuthZEN Authorization API 1.0. Practical examples include electronic business cards, role assignment, access routing, and mandatory MFA checks before token issuance. The piece stresses maintaining data ownership with source systems while establishing SSO as the single point of trust for applications.
Bitrix24 Releases Fully On-Premise BI Constructor for Regulated Enterprises
Bitrix24 has introduced a new delivery model for its BI Constructor that allows complete deployment inside a customer's own infrastructure. The update eliminates any requirement for external servers, cloud APIs, or internet connectivity, ensuring that all corporate data remains within the organization's closed perimeter. Previously, even the boxed version of the platform needed access to external infrastructure for updates and auxiliary services, creating conflicts with internal security policies and regulatory demands in highly regulated sectors. The new on-premise variant performs all data processing and storage exclusively on customer servers, giving organizations full control over access rights, backups, updates, and integration with internal protection tools. The solution is compatible with the boxed edition of Bitrix24 running on PostgreSQL and does not connect to external CDNs or cloud services. Bitrix24 expects strong interest from large enterprises and organizations handling restricted-access data that must stay inside the corporate network. Pilot implementations have already been completed, with broader customer pilots planned in the coming months.
Russia's Data Leak Penalties: 2.6 Million Rubles in Fines Despite 1.58 Billion Records Exposed in 2025
Russia introduced turnover-based fines for personal data leaks through Federal Law 420-FZ in late 2024, fundamentally altering the economics of information security investments. Over the first 18 months, Roskomnadzor opened 52 administrative investigations and issued 40 protocols totaling just 2.6 million rubles in penalties, with zero turnover fines applied. This occurred against a backdrop of 1.58 billion compromised records in 2025 alone. Public data leaks dropped fourfold in the first half of 2026, yet trading activity on underground forums rose nearly 60 percent as operators shifted to private sales. The law now ties penalties directly to the number of affected individuals and adds a turnover component for repeat violations under Article 13.11 of the Code of Administrative Offenses. Analysts note that the mere threat of larger fines has prompted companies to reassess data retention policies and risk models even without actual enforcement precedents.
Russia Authorizes Temporary State Takeover of Unprotected Critical Infrastructure
President Vladimir Putin has signed a decree that empowers the Russian government to appoint temporary managers for critical infrastructure facilities whose owners have failed to ensure adequate security. The measure directly targets operators of objects classified as critical infrastructure who have not met protection requirements. Under the new rules, the state can intervene by installing an interim administrator to oversee operations until security standards are satisfied. This approach aims to prevent potential disruptions or threats arising from insufficiently defended assets. The decree provides a legal mechanism for rapid governmental response without permanent nationalization of the facilities. It reflects ongoing efforts to strengthen oversight of sectors deemed essential to national security and stability.