How to Detect and Remove Stolen Photos from Fake Profiles, Listings and Ads
Photographs are routinely stolen from social networks, old advertisements, building chats, school websites and review platforms. The images later appear in unknown profiles, advertisements, product cards, rental listings or suspicious Telegram channels. People usually discover the theft when friends notice or when they run the pictures through dedicated reverse-image search services.
One photograph can violate several rights at once. Using a portrait to advertise courses infringes the right to one’s image, commercial-use rules and the photographer’s copyright. Creating a fake page with someone else’s face to solicit money requires a fraud report rather than a simple takedown request.
Legal basis in Russia
Article 152.1 of the Russian Civil Code protects the image of a citizen. Publication or distribution of a person’s photograph without consent is prohibited except in cases of public interest, open-place photography or paid posing. Copyright exists independently; the creator can demand removal, attribution or compensation. Consent from the recognizable person is always required for publication.
Where to search for copies
A single search engine rarely finds every duplicate. Yandex Images performs well on Russian-language sites. Google Lens excels at locating similar images and cropped fragments. TinEye often surfaces older publications missed by larger engines. Bing Visual Search serves as a supplementary tool for foreign sites. Text searches by name, nickname, company or rare phrases can reveal hidden results.
Users should also upload cropped versions focusing on the face, interior details or background objects, because thieves frequently crop, recolor or overlay stickers on images.
Preserving evidence before complaining
Before contacting the offender or platform, capture the entire page, record the exact URL, save the page as PDF, note the discovery date and retain the original file with metadata. For serious cases, a notary can officially inspect the page. Archive services such as web.archive.org are useful but incomplete; courts prefer screenshots, PDFs and notarized records.
Filing complaints
Platforms respond faster to built-in forms. VKontakte accepts reports via the post or community menu, with users flagging impersonation and linking the real account. Odnoklassniki handles photo complaints in its violations section. Telegram allows in-app blocking; fraud cases can also be reported to @notoscam. Avito, Yula and Cian collect reports on individual listings. Marketplaces provide dedicated copyright forms. When platforms ignore requests, complainants may contact the hosting provider.
Complaints to Roskomnadzor are appropriate when personal data such as phone numbers or addresses are leaked alongside the photo. Police should be contacted for extortion, blackmail or fraud. Courts can award compensation and issue injunctions.
Protecting future images
Technical prevention is limited, yet several practical measures reduce risk: publish lower-resolution versions, apply watermarks, store originals securely, photograph products against a background containing the seller’s nickname, avoid uploading sensitive documents, tighten privacy settings on family albums and regularly run reverse-image searches.
Related articles
Mozilla Adds Built-in Ad Blocker to Firefox for iOS Devices
Mozilla has integrated a native ad-blocking feature directly into its Firefox browser for iOS. The update allows iPhone and iPad users to block third-party advertisements and associated trackers before web pages load, eliminating the need for separate extensions. Apple’s App Store policies have long restricted the use of third-party content blockers on iOS compared to desktop and Android platforms. The new functionality targets intrusive elements such as pop-up windows, content-overlapping banners, and other advertising formats. By handling blocking at the browser level, Firefox for iOS improves user privacy and reduces exposure to tracking mechanisms without requiring additional software installation.
De-Clouding IoT Devices: Local Control for Midea Air Conditioners and Tuya-Based Cat Feeders
A security researcher detailed a methodical approach to eliminating vendor cloud dependency for Wi-Fi IoT devices in a smart home setup. After acquiring a cat, the author was forced to integrate several Tuya-based appliances that only worked through proprietary cloud apps. Using hardware analysis tools including UART adapters, multimeters, and soldering equipment, the devices were disassembled and their controllers identified. The Midea air conditioner controller based on TYWE3S ESP8266 was reflashed with ESPHome to enable direct Home Assistant integration. For the Tuya WBR3-powered cat feeder running on an RTL8720CF chip, OpenBeken firmware was installed after extracting the original firmware with ltchiptool. Detailed UART communication analysis between the Wi-Fi module and MCU allowed full recreation of scheduling and control functions locally via MQTT.
Russia Starts Blocking Encrypted DNS Protocols DoH and DoT Across Major ISPs
Since mid-August 2026, subscribers of Rostelecom, Dom.ru, Tattelecom, SkyNet and Beeline have reported sudden failures of encrypted DNS services from Google and Cloudflare. The blocking affects both DoT on port 853 and DoH on port 443, but the mechanisms differ: DoT connections receive TCP RST packets while DoH sessions are silently dropped after the TLS ClientHello. Analysis shows the interference originates from TSPU equipment performing DPI on SNI fields and known resolver domains. At the same time, ordinary UDP DNS queries are being intercepted and answered by the NSIDI infrastructure, returning NXDOMAIN for blocked domains. The changes indicate a centrally coordinated rollout of new filtering rules rather than isolated operator actions. Users are advised that encrypted DNS no longer provides reliable privacy or circumvention and that full VPN tunnels remain the only robust option.
Glassbox Tool Exposes Browser Fingerprinting Risks and Limitations of Incognito Mode
Developer and security researcher David Dale has released Glassbox, an open tool that runs over 30 browser fingerprinting checks to show how identifiable a user appears to trackers. The service evaluates Canvas, WebGL, installed fonts, WebAssembly functions, available APIs, third-party authentication state, and audio processing characteristics entirely in the browser. Results include raw test data and an identifiability score capped at roughly 33 bits, sufficient in theory to single out one person among the global population. Tests reported by The Register showed Chrome at 99 percent identifiability, Firefox at 89 percent, and Tor Browser at 56 percent, though these figures rely on a mathematical model rather than real-world visitor databases. Dale warns that overly hardened configurations can increase uniqueness and recommends using Tor or VPN together with WebRTC leak prevention to blend into larger anonymity sets.