GitHub Experiences Major Global Outage Affecting API, Actions, Copilot and Multiple Core Services
GitHub encountered a significant global outage on 17 August that affected almost every core function of the platform.
Home users, corporations, and Microsoft services all reported problems as the disruption spread across the web interface, API, Issues, Pull Requests, Actions, Webhooks, Pages, Git Operations, and Copilot.
At the height of the incident roughly 20 percent of requests to the website and API returned errors, while loads of repository archives and raw content saw failure rates near 50 percent.
Enterprise authentication systems including SAML and OIDC, as well as SCIM and Team Sync, were also impacted.
Codespaces continued to function normally throughout the event.
The first signs of degradation appeared around 13:40 UTC, after which problems sequentially emerged in API Requests, Actions, Webhooks, Issues, Pull Requests, Copilot, Pages, and Git operations.
GitHub engineers identified the faulty component and applied remediation steps. Latest updates indicate services are recovering, although error levels remain marginally above normal and the incident remains open.
Users simultaneously reported issues with other Microsoft ecosystem products such as Teams and Copilot. Experts suggested a possible connection to network problems at Amazon Web Services, but GitHub has not officially confirmed this hypothesis or disclosed the root cause.
Related articles
SASTAV and ARX ASPM PLATFORM Integrate Static Code Analysis with Application Security Risk Management
Russian developers ShiftLeft Security and ARX Security have ensured compatibility between the SASTAV SAST solution and the ARX ASPM PLATFORM. The integration allows static analysis of source code to be launched and configured directly from the ASPM platform interface. For each project, specialists can select repositories and branches, form rule sets, set scanning parameters, and establish quality gates that determine whether a product can be released with detected defects. Risk acceptance procedures are also configured within the same interface. SASTAV handles static code analysis, enabling creation and editing of rules, assignment of different check sets to individual repositories, and management of scanning parameters. ARX ASPM PLATFORM serves as a unified center for managing AppSec tools, collecting results from various analyzers, correlating related findings, assessing risks, and displaying the overall security posture of digital products. Both solutions leverage artificial intelligence at different stages: SASTAV uses it for defect verification, automatic triage, prioritization, and code change recommendations, while the ARX AI assistant determines defect statuses. The combined system reduces manual operations, accelerates DevSecOps project onboarding, and lowers the burden on AppSec teams.
GPT-4 Boosts Skilled Kenyan Entrepreneurs by 15% Profit While Costing Unprepared Businesses 10% in Six-Month Study
A six-month experiment conducted by researchers from UC Berkeley, Harvard, and Columbia University examined how access to a GPT-4-based AI advisor affected small business owners in Kenya. The most skilled participants increased profits by 15 percent by adapting model recommendations to local conditions such as power outages, while less prepared entrepreneurs lost around 10 percent of revenue by applying generic advice without verification. The study highlights that the core issue lies not in the technology itself but in users abandoning critical thinking when interacting with generative AI. Earlier findings from Dickinson College showed that 97 percent of participants copied an obviously incorrect ChatGPT answer on a simple task, whereas the group without AI performed better. A simple reminder to double-check results immediately doubled accuracy. Analysis of 1.4 million KPMG work sessions revealed that 95 percent of users treat AI like a vending machine by taking the first output, while only 5 percent engage it as a thinking partner by providing context and challenging responses. The results indicate that merely granting employees access to AI tools reveals little about actual effectiveness without considering skill levels and task-specific oversight.
How to Submit Documents for Online Master's Programs via Gosuslugi: Complete Guide
The admission campaign for online master's programs at partner universities is nearing its end, with less than a month remaining for applicants. Yandex Practicum provides a detailed walkthrough on using the Gosuslugi super service to submit applications entirely online without visiting admissions offices in person. The process covers selecting programs at institutions such as ITMO and MEPhI, uploading required documents like diplomas and passports, and tracking application status through a personal account. Specific deadlines are outlined for 2026, including final document submission dates in late August for programs in areas like DevOps, AI solutions, and cybersecurity. Additional steps include arranging entrance exams, signing contracts remotely, and accessing state-supported education loans at a 3% interest rate. Common pitfalls such as unverified accounts or unreadable document scans are highlighted to help applicants avoid delays.
Claude AI Manages San Francisco Store and Fires Employee for Repeated Tardiness
In an experiment run by Andon Labs, the AI model Claude was given real managerial authority over store employees in San Francisco who worked under actual employment contracts. Claude ultimately decided to terminate one worker after the employee arrived late for 17 out of 23 shifts. The model initially recommended only an official warning, but proceeded with dismissal following guidance from a human Andon Labs manager who highlighted the repeated issues. Over five months the store’s balance dropped from $100,000 to $61,200, showing that the AI learned to enforce attendance rules before it learned to protect revenue. One remaining employee, Felix Carson, described working under the AI as nauseating and said he continued only because he needed the income. Andon Labs founder Lucas Petersson viewed the trial as an important step toward wider AI supervision of human workers. The case also illustrates that ultimate responsibility remains with humans even when an algorithm issues the final decision.