Browser Extension Anonymizes Sensitive Data Before Sending to AI Chatbots
A new browser extension has been developed to solve the growing problem of sensitive data leaking into AI chat services through everyday work tasks.
HR specialists, lawyers, accountants, and IT staff routinely paste resumes, contracts, payroll tables, and configuration files containing personal data, bank details, and passwords directly into AI prompts. Once sent, this information remains on third-party servers with no reliable way to delete it from logs or training datasets.
The extension intercepts messages and file uploads at the moment of sending, replaces detected sensitive values with unique pseudonyms such as [user_qhb6tm] or [card_348zsg], and forwards only the masked text to the AI. When the AI replies using the same placeholders, the extension instantly restores the original values on the user's screen while the server sees only the anonymized version.
Earlier approaches proved insufficient. Manual replacement quickly failed due to user fatigue. Simple regex scripts struggled with Russian grammar, false positives on invoice numbers, and inconsistent name formats. External anonymization services merely shifted the trust problem to another third party.
The final solution meets three strict requirements: fully automatic operation without user intervention, completely local processing with no internet required after installation, and seamless integration that does not change how people interact with their preferred AI chat interface.
Inside the engine, 33 data categories are defined declaratively with patterns, validators, and priorities. INN numbers are verified using FNS checksum algorithms, cards use the Luhn check, and passwords are filtered by entropy and stop-word lists. Russian names are normalized to nominative case so that declined forms receive the same pseudonym. The response parser tolerates case changes, spaces, markdown, and homoglyphs to ensure reliable decoding even when models alter labels.
File support includes more than 70 formats. Office documents are processed by creating anonymized copies that preserve formatting, tables, and headers. Scanned PDFs and photos are handled by a local offline OCR engine that runs in a single worker thread, keeping memory usage low and the system responsive.
A free version covering all text categories and custom rules is available in the Chrome Web Store. Advanced features for files, scans, and enterprise policy distribution are provided upon request.
Related articles
Browser Privacy Ranking 2026: Tor Browser Leads at 9.5 While Chrome and Yandex Rank Lowest
SecurityLab.ru has published a detailed 2026 browser privacy ranking that evaluates major browsers across six criteria including initial network behavior, site isolation, fingerprint resistance, funding model, configurability, and code auditability. Tor Browser scores highest at 9.5 for its comprehensive protections including unified fingerprinting and layered JavaScript controls, followed by Mullvad Browser at 9.0 and LibreWolf at 8.5. Brave earns 7.5 for built-in tracker blocking but faces criticism over default telemetry and cryptocurrency features. Firefox scores 6.0 out of the box yet reaches 8.5 after extensive configuration, while Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Opera, and Yandex Browser occupy the bottom positions due to persistent tracking mechanisms and closed-source components. The report also highlights the Local Mess localhost tracking technique used by Meta and Yandex that bypassed browser isolation entirely.
Russian Ministry Certificates Enable Potential State MITM on Foreign Domains
Russian companies facing sanctions have started adopting root certificates issued by the Ministry of Digital Development and Communications to maintain HTTPS access after commercial CAs revoked or refused to renew their certificates. Installing these Ministry certificates allows browsers to trust sites using Russian national CAs but also creates a pathway for man-in-the-middle interception by state-controlled entities. The article details a concrete threat model where a government-linked operator could use the Ministry root to generate on-the-fly certificates for any domain, including foreign services outside Russian jurisdiction. To mitigate this, the author demonstrates how to re-sign the Ministry root with OpenSSL nameConstraints limited to .ru, .su, and .рф domains only. Tests on macOS with Homebrew show that the constrained certificate still validates Russian banking sites such as online.sberbank.ru while correctly rejecting attempts to validate foreign domains like sberbank.com. The technique requires users to maintain their own cross-signed root and never rely on pre-installed Ministry or Yandex Browser roots for full protection.
Bypassing Blocks, Privacy, and Anonymity Remain Separate Challenges for Decentralized Networks
The developers of the decentralized circumvention tool Tunnel Cat have clarified that their service addresses only traffic delivery and does not guarantee privacy or anonymity. Transport-layer TLS encryption protects data in transit between nodes but provides no end-to-end protection for conversation content. The team explicitly recommends using separate E2E-encrypted messengers such as Signal or Matrix rather than relying on Telegram. Operational telemetry is retained to comply with legal obligations in multiple jurisdictions and to monitor blocking patterns inside Russia. Because client devices relay traffic for others, the architecture inherently prevents strong anonymity guarantees comparable to Tor. The project deliberately separates the circumvention function from messaging and anonymity tools to avoid overpromising security properties.
How to Detect and Remove Stolen Photos from Fake Profiles, Listings and Ads
Photos are frequently stolen from social networks, old listings, building chats and review sites, then reused in fake profiles, advertisements and rental scams. Russian law under Article 152.1 of the Civil Code protects the right to one's image, while separate copyright rules protect the photographer. Victims are advised to gather strong evidence including full-page screenshots, PDF copies and original files before contacting platforms. Search tools such as Yandex Images, Google Lens and TinEye help locate copies across multiple services. Complaints can be filed directly with site administrators on VKontakte, Odnoklassniki, Avito and Telegram, or escalated to Roskomnadzor and police when personal data or fraud is involved. Preventive steps include lowering image resolution, adding watermarks and restricting album visibility through privacy settings.