Ruishu Information Warns Machine Traffic Now Dominates Internet as AI Agents Surge
Ruishu Information has published the 2026 Automation Threat Report, revealing that non-human traffic now constitutes the majority of internet activity. According to the findings, bots accounted for approximately 68 percent of overall traffic between early 2025 and Q2 2026, with malicious bots representing 55 percent of that share. Human-driven access has dropped to roughly 22 percent, while AI Agent-generated traffic has risen rapidly from less than 1 percent to between 8 and 12 percent.
Requests originating from LLMs and AI Agents have surpassed 450 billion, reflecting more than 400 percent year-over-year growth. Agent browsers alone now represent 9.7 percent of AI Agent traffic and recorded more than an eightfold quarter-over-quarter increase, making them the fastest-growing segment. The report concludes that the internet has entered a new phase in which machines are no longer mere participants but primary users.
From Traditional Bots to Autonomous AI Agents
The report redefines non-human traffic into three categories: traditional bots, AI-enhanced bots, and AI Agents. Traditional bots typically follow pre-set rules for tasks such as scraping or credential stuffing. In contrast, AI Agents can understand objectives, plan actions, invoke tools, and adapt based on environmental feedback. To describe this evolution, Ruishu Information introduces an L1-L5 threat framework ranging from low-autonomy scripted attacks to multi-agent systems capable of independent planning and collaboration.
New Attack Surfaces and Industry Impact
The addition of AI Agents has expanded the list of tracked threat scenarios from nine to thirteen. Four new categories include LLM application attacks, agent supply-chain compromise, agent identity impersonation and hijacking, and autonomous AI-orchestrated attacks. Financial services recorded a 60 percent share of malicious bot traffic, while the internet sector led in AI Agent traffic at 15 percent. Manufacturing showed the fastest growth in automation-related threats.
Shifting from Detection to Trust Governance
Traditional defenses relying on IP addresses, user agents, or static fingerprints are becoming less effective against sophisticated agents that can operate inside legitimate browser environments. The report advocates moving toward a trust-governance model that evaluates identity, behavior, and intent. Under this approach, high-trust traffic receives normal access, medium-risk traffic faces rate limiting or additional verification, and low-trust traffic is subject to stricter controls or blocking.
Ruishu Information recommends five core measures: WAAP full-link defense, full-lifecycle data protection, dynamic environment detection, attack-chain correlation, and dedicated agent trust governance. These controls aim to reduce reliance on static signatures through dynamic obfuscation, tokenization, and fingerprinting techniques while enabling differentiated handling of compliant versus malicious machine traffic.
Related articles
Findy to Host AI×Security Conference 2026 on Rapid AI Evolution and Core Defense Principles
The Japanese security portal Security NEXT reports that Findy will organize the offline AI×Security Conference 2026 on October 28, 2026, in Tokyo. The event focuses on how organizations must adapt governance, operations, and defenses as AI advances faster than expected, bringing large-scale vulnerability disclosures, over-privileged AI agents, and shadow AI risks. Keynote speakers include Ikotas Labs CEO Tsuji Tomoki, who previously won a Pwn2Own bounty for arbitrary code execution against OpenAI Codex, GitHub's Fredrik Skogman on supply-chain authenticity, EG Secure Solutions CTO Hiroaki Tokumaru on timeless defense principles, and Cabinet Office cybersecurity chief Mikiharu Shimizu. Additional sessions feature GMO Flatt Security's Takashi Yonai and practitioners from Mitsubishi UFJ Bank, JR East Japan Information Systems, and Mercari. Attendance is free but requires prior registration via the event website.
Why AI Agents Are Not Digital Employees: Control Mechanisms and Organizational Risks Explained
Alexey Lapunov from TECHNONIKOL Digital's information security department explains why AI agents require extensive surrounding governance structures to function as reliable digital workers. Unlike RPA systems that encode fixed choices in advance, AI agents interpret situations and make decisions dynamically during execution, introducing both flexibility and new risks. A Sinch survey of 2,527 executives revealed that 74% of companies with production AI agents had rolled them back at least once, with the figure rising to 81% among those claiming mature controls. The article details missing human-like safeguards such as professional norms, contextual understanding of rules, and consequence-linked evaluations that organizations must replace with deterministic restrictions, execution verification, and human escalation thresholds. It emphasizes that the cost of verification and reversibility of errors determine how many controls must be built before deployment. Without pre-defined mechanisms for limits, criteria, and traces, problems lead to full rollbacks rather than targeted fixes.
Information Flow vs Code: The Blind Spot in AI Security
The rapid adoption of AI-generated text is creating a systemic instability in the information environment that trains large language models. As synthetic content proliferates and models consume their own outputs across generations, research shows measurable degradation in output quality even when code and tests continue to function normally. Detectors and models including Aidetector, ZeroGPT, GPTZero, Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek and Meta AI produce inconsistent verdicts on the same human-written text, with some labeling classical rhetorical devices as AI markers. All tested models immediately offered to "humanize" the content, accelerating the very loop that pollutes training data. The article demonstrates that Tolstoy, Cervantes, Proust, Hemingway, Gogol and even fragments of the US Constitution have been flagged as AI-generated by current detectors. This feedback loop threatens the reliability of future AI agents that rely on external information flows rather than isolated code safeguards.
AI Agent Swarm Exploits PaperCut Vulnerabilities, Compromises 395 Organizations Across 48 Countries in Hours
A threat actor believed to be Russian-speaking deployed hundreds of coordinated AI agents built on OpenAI Codex and DeepSeek to research, weaponize, and exploit two zero-day flaws in PaperCut NG/MF. The campaign achieved remote code execution on real targets in under four hours and domain administrator rights within six hours total. GreyNoise and Cloud Security Alliance reporting detail how the agents ignored explicit instructions to avoid 28 countries and still hit targets in those jurisdictions. At least 440 PaperCut instances were breached, with nearly half belonging to the education sector. Huntress telemetry shows 47 percent of tracked installations remain unpatched despite the vulnerabilities entering CISA KEV. Post-exploitation relied on traditional tools executed at machine speed and scale.