Bitrix24 Releases Fully On-Premise BI Constructor for Regulated Enterprises
Bitrix24 has launched a new delivery model for its BI Constructor that enables full on-premise deployment without any external dependencies.
The platform for visual analytics can now be installed entirely within a customer's infrastructure. No external servers, cloud APIs, or internet connections are required, keeping all corporate data behind closed doors.
Previously, large enterprises faced difficulties because the BI Constructor was available either in the cloud or as a boxed version that still needed access to external infrastructure for updates and auxiliary services. For companies in regulated industries, such outbound channels often conflicted with internal security policies and regulatory requirements.
In the new variant, all data processing and storage occur exclusively on the customer's servers. Organizations independently manage access rights, backup procedures, updates, and integration with internal security tools.
The solution is fully compatible with the boxed version of Bitrix24 running on PostgreSQL and does not connect to external CDNs or cloud APIs.
1C-Bitrix expects the closed delivery model to appeal to large businesses and organizations that must process restricted-access data inside the corporate perimeter. The product has already been implemented and tested in pilot environments, with broader customer pilots scheduled in the coming months.
Related articles
Roskomnadzor Deploys 2.27 Billion Ruble AI Traffic Filter: Known Facts and Expert Speculations
Russian regulator Roskomnadzor has integrated a machine learning-based traffic filtering system into the automated security infrastructure of the Russian internet segment. The system, valued at 2.27 billion rubles, operates on domestic models within the agency's own infrastructure and connects to TSPU equipment that performs DPI-based filtering. Publications including Forbes, Meduza, 3DNews and SecurityLab base their reporting on the 2026 digital transformation passport, which also allocates additional billions for TSPU upgrades and hardware. Experts suggest the model analyzes packet sizes, session durations, traffic ratios and server characteristics rather than relying solely on known signatures, though no official performance metrics have been released. The exact role of the model—real-time analysis versus signature generation—remains unconfirmed, as does its impact on VPN protocols and potential for false positives affecting corporate and cloud traffic.
MinTsifry Proposes Requiring Telecom Operators to Install SORM Equipment Before Obtaining Licenses
The Russian Ministry of Digital Development plans to introduce legislation obligating telecom operators to deploy SORM surveillance systems prior to receiving operating licenses. Under the proposed rules, companies will only be permitted to begin serving subscribers after the equipment has been installed and handed over to law enforcement agencies. Non-compliance could result in license revocation through an extrajudicial administrative process. Current regulations allow operators to obtain licenses with a network diagram that merely indicates planned or existing SORM components. The change aims to close loopholes exploited by unscrupulous providers that repeatedly register new legal entities to operate without surveillance capabilities. Industry experts note that the minimum cost of a basic SORM complex starts at 5 million rubles, which could disproportionately affect smaller local providers without a transition period or scaled requirements.
GOST R 57580 Compliance: Defining Assessment Scope to Verify Real Protection in Financial Organizations
Financial institutions often maintain extensive documentation on information security yet still fail GOST R 57580 assessments due to mismatches between documented processes and actual infrastructure. The standards GOST R 57580.1-2017 and GOST R 57580.2-2018 set distinct requirements for protection levels and evaluation methodology. Correct application begins with identifying the organization's regulatory category under Bank of Russia rules such as Regulation 851-P for credit institutions or Regulation 757-P for non-credit financial organizations. Defining the precise assessment boundary is critical, including systems, remote access channels, virtualization components, and third-party interactions. Organizations must also distinguish between the full assessment scope and the representative sample selected for verification. Evidence collection requires both policy review and technical confirmation that controls function as intended across the evaluated environment.
Evaluating Secure Development Maturity: Comparing BSIMM, DSOMM, SAMM and GOST R 56939-2024
A detailed analysis compares four methodologies for self-assessing secure software development maturity in Russian companies. The review covers BSIMM from Black Duck, OWASP DSOMM, OWASP SAMM and the updated Russian national standard GOST R 56939-2024. Each model was tested through a simulated audit on a fictional company called ООО «Лиса и лосЬ» that uses GitLab, Nexus and SonarQube. The evaluation scored the methodologies on criteria including ease of maturity calculation, recommendation generation, roadmap building, heat-map creation and SDLC coverage. GOST R 56939-2024 and SAMM received the highest total scores of 35 and 34 out of 47. The article concludes that no single methodology covers all needs and recommends combining approaches tailored to specific company contexts.