Habr•August 26, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

7 Core Rules for Responding to Ransomware and Infrastructure Breaches

In recent months, questions and requests for advice after various incidents have become increasingly common: some organizations find their systems encrypted, others discover that their infrastructure has been damaged or that corporate email accounts and credentials have been stolen.

In mature companies with established information security practices, such situations are already covered by documented incident response procedures, and teams know exactly who does what in the first minutes and hours. However, when an organization encounters an incident for the first time, the situation becomes far more difficult: everything is down, business stakeholders are anxious, information is scarce, and immediate action is required.

At such moments it is easy to act too aggressively—rebooting servers, deleting suspicious files, clearing logs, or starting restoration from backups—and thereby accidentally complicate any subsequent investigation.

1. Isolate affected systems

The first action is to disconnect compromised machines from the network, including LAN, Wi-Fi, and VPN connections. If the boundary of the incident is clear, isolate specific hosts or network segments. When the scope is unknown and the attack may still be spreading, temporarily shutting down the entire network can be preferable to allowing further lateral movement.

Isolation does not mean powering off the server. Systems should be left running whenever possible. The preferred method is to isolate the host externally—through switch ACLs, firewall rules, port shutdowns, or by physically unplugging the network cable. If software controls must be used, both inbound and outbound traffic should be blocked so that a compromised system cannot continue communicating with attacker infrastructure.

2. Do not reboot or power off systems indiscriminately

A common reaction is to reboot an encrypted server or power it off entirely. Rebooting or shutting down erases volatile information that may be critical for forensic analysis: contents of RAM, active connections, running processes, and other traces of activity at the time of discovery. Once the spread has been contained through isolation, leave systems in their current state unless active encryption or destruction is still occurring.

3. Do not delete or clean anything

Another instinctive response is to locate suspicious items and remove them immediately. Avoid running antivirus scans that delete files, clearing the %TEMP% folder, wiping event logs, or terminating processes simply because they appear unusual. Artifacts that seem irrelevant now—malware launch files, logs with timestamps, command-line arguments, or evidence of lateral movement—may later prove essential to reconstructing the attack.

4. Do not begin restoring from backups

When data is encrypted or systems are broken, the immediate impulse is often to restore from backups and resume operations. This step should be postponed until it is confirmed that the backups themselves are intact and that the attacker is no longer present in the environment. Restoring systems into a still-compromised network risks a second round of encryption. Offline backups should also be protected and not connected directly to potentially compromised infrastructure.

5. Close obviously compromised access channels

If the initial entry point is known—whether a specific account, VPN, exposed RDP, SSH, or email credential—that channel must be closed. When dealing with accounts, terminate active sessions and revoke tokens where possible. Perform these actions from the perimeter or a trusted system rather than from a potentially compromised host. Avoid mass password resets or broad infrastructure changes in the first minutes, as such actions create noise and alter the environment that investigators need to examine.

6. Document what happened

During an incident, details are easily forgotten. Spend a few minutes recording the facts: when the problem was first noticed, who observed it and what exactly they saw, which systems are confirmed affected, what was happening immediately before discovery, the exact time and time zone, and what actions administrators have already taken. Screenshots of ransom notes, error messages, and system states should also be captured. These records will be requested by any investigator and help reconstruct the timeline later.

7. Stop and wait for a plan

Once affected systems are isolated, obvious access channels are closed, the current state is documented, and further spread has been halted, further experimentation should cease. Installing multiple antivirus products, deleting files, rebuilding domain controllers, or returning servers to production without a coordinated plan can destroy evidence and complicate recovery. From this point, structured activities—artifact collection, entry-point identification, timeline reconstruction, and scope assessment—should begin according to a deliberate plan.

In summary, the seven rules are: isolate infected systems, avoid unnecessary reboots or shutdowns, do not delete or clean files, do not start backup restoration prematurely, close known compromised access paths, record observed facts and actions, and stop once containment is achieved so that subsequent work follows a structured plan. These steps are not a complete incident response framework, but they provide a solid starting point when an organization faces its first ransomware or infrastructure incident.

Related articles

Securitylab•Ransomware & Extortion

Negotiating with Ransomware Attackers: Lifeline or Legal Trap?

Ransomware incidents leave organizations facing encrypted systems and threats to leak stolen data, prompting urgent questions about whether to contact extortionists. Experts emphasize that initial response must focus on containment, evidence preservation, and backup verification rather than immediate payment discussions. NCSC guidelines stress isolating affected systems, securing communication channels, and understanding the exact nature of demands before any dialogue begins. Real-world cases such as the PowerSchool breach demonstrate that paying ransoms does not ensure data deletion or end extortion attempts. Legal risks vary by jurisdiction, with prohibitions in places like North Carolina and sanctions concerns from OFAC complicating decisions for many entities. Technical recovery options, including tools from the No More Ransom project, should be evaluated alongside insurance and regulatory notification requirements under Russian Federal Law No. 152-FZ. Ultimately, successful resolution depends on verified restoration capabilities and eliminating attacker persistence rather than any negotiated discount.

BoletimSec•Ransomware & Extortion

Qilin Ransomware Claims at Least 365 Victims in Three Months of Attacks

The Qilin ransomware group has claimed responsibility for at least 365 organizations compromised over a three-month period, according to research published on November 11, 2026. Operating as a ransomware-as-a-service platform since September 2022, Qilin supplies the attack infrastructure while affiliates conduct intrusions and receive at least 80 percent of ransom payments. The group employs double extortion tactics, stealing sensitive data before encryption and threatening public leaks if ransoms are not paid. Its affiliate program was described as the most active worldwide during the measured timeframe. Researchers also linked the group's administrator, known as Haise, to Aleksey Mikhailovich Yakovtsev, a 36-year-old resident of Saint Petersburg, Russia, through reused online identities spanning multiple cybercrime forums and leaked records from Gosuslugi. The investigation highlighted Qilin's technical reach, including targeted attacks against VMware vCenter and ESXi environments using remote management tools, lateral movement, and vulnerable drivers to disable security products.

BoletimSec•Ransomware & Extortion

Ransomware Group BYOD Claims Theft of Toyota Customer Personal Data in Unverified Extortion Listing

A ransomware group calling itself BYOD has added Toyota to its victim list on a dark web extortion site, claiming to have stolen personal information belonging to the automaker’s customers. The announcement, updated on November 10, 2026, alleges access to full names, email addresses, physical addresses, telephone numbers, and dates of birth, along with data from the company’s self-service kiosk terminals. No independent verification of the claims has been performed, and the listing provides no details on the volume of records, affected regions, or specific business units involved. The group states that parts of the environment were isolated but claims residual remote access paths remained; however, the announcement contains no technical indicators or proof-of-compromise samples. Toyota has not issued any public statement confirming or denying the incident. The report notes that similar unverified listings are sometimes used to pressure victims into negotiations and may include repackaged data from prior breaches. This marks a contrast with Toyota’s 2023 public disclosure of a separate cloud misconfiguration incident that the company itself reported.

BoletimSec•Ransomware & Extortion

Santos Port Authority Systems Offline After Suspected Cyber Incident and Possible Ransom Demand

The systems of Autoridade Portuária de Santos (APS), which manages Brazil's largest port, have been unavailable since the morning of November 6, 2026. The outage began after a power fluctuation that affected servers and later recurred despite initial restoration efforts. APS has confirmed a suspected cyber incident but has not determined the full scope or whether data was accessed. Local reporting indicates that alleged attackers demanded financial ransom to restore operations, though this claim remains unconfirmed by APS or federal police. Backups have been sent for forensic examination while Serpro technicians assist in recovery. Port operations continue using manual procedures and heightened security measures, but vessel and truck wait times have increased significantly.