Habr•August 31, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Corporate Wi-Fi Passwords Stored in Plain Text on Every Connected Device

Any company laptop that has connected to the corporate Wi-Fi network retains the network password in plain text. When an employee departs, the device is returned, yet the password remains accessible through simple operating-system commands.

Windows

The built-in netsh utility lists all saved wireless profiles with the command netsh wlan show profiles. The password for a specific network is retrieved by running netsh wlan show profile name="CorpNet" key=clear. The resulting Key Content line displays the passphrase in clear text. No administrative privileges are required; the command works under the same user account that originally joined the network.

Linux

NetworkManager stores connection details in files located at /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/. The command sudo grep -r 'psk=' /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/ extracts the pre-shared key in plain text. Ordinary users can list connection names without elevated rights using nmcli -t -f NAME,TYPE,AUTOCONNECT connection show.

macOS

Passwords reside in the system Keychain. The command security find-generic-password -ga "CorpNet" will display the password, but the operating system first prompts the user for explicit confirmation, providing a stronger access-control model than Windows or Linux defaults.

This behavior is not a vulnerability; devices must retain credentials to reconnect automatically. The real issue lies in organizational policy. A shared Wi-Fi password is known to every employee, contractor, and guest who has ever connected. Changing it requires reconfiguring every corporate device, so rotation is often postponed for years. Personal devices that joined the network may also carry the password into cloud backups.

Recommended alternatives include WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise authentication, which ties network access to individual user accounts and automatically revokes access upon account deactivation. A separate, time-limited guest network with strong isolation from internal resources allows frequent password changes without affecting staff devices. When a shared password remains unavoidable, it should be stored in a password manager, rotated after every employee departure or contractor engagement, and never posted visibly in meeting rooms.

Related articles

AntiMalware•Policy & Regulation

VK Files Lawsuit in EU Court Seeking to Overturn Sanctions Imposed in July

Russian internet company VK has submitted a formal challenge to the European Union's sanctions regime by filing a case with the Court of Justice of the European Union. The company argues that the restrictions placed on VK and its subsidiary Communication Platform LLC are both unjustified and unlawful. The lawsuit, registered under case number T-664/26 on 7 October, directly contests the July sanctions that targeted the developer of the MAX messenger. Earlier restrictions had already led to the removal of multiple VK ecosystem applications from Apple App Store and Google Play, forcing users toward alternative distribution channels such as RuStore, Huawei AppGallery, Samsung Galaxy Store and Xiaomi GetApps. While installed Android applications continue to function and receive updates, iOS users face disrupted push notifications after the apps were delisted. The legal action itself does not automatically restore app availability in the affected stores.

Securitylab•Policy & Regulation

VPN Rules in Russia 2026: No Fine for Ordinary Users but Strict Penalties for Advertising and Extremist Content Access

As of September 2026, Russia maintains no separate administrative fine for ordinary citizens simply connecting to a VPN service. Responsibility arises only for specific actions such as deliberately searching for known extremist materials, advertising tools to bypass restrictions, or failing to comply with Roskomnadzor demands as a service operator. Corporate VPNs used for remote access to company networks remain fully legal under exceptions in Article 15.8 of Law No. 149-FZ. New provisions in the Code of Administrative Offenses, including Articles 13.53, 13.52 and 14.3 introduced by Laws 281-FZ and 282-FZ, impose fines ranging from 3,000 to 500,000 rubles depending on the violation and the offender category. The rules distinguish clearly between end users, service owners and advertisers. VPN technology itself is not banned, yet public services face ongoing blocking and operators must integrate with state filtering systems. The material reflects the regulatory situation on 24 September 2026.

Habr•Policy & Regulation

Troubleshooting Erroneous TSPU Blocks: How Admins Can Collaborate with Russian Regulators

A Moneta client outage traced back to erroneous filtering on Russia's TSPU system rather than internal infrastructure or DDoS protection. Engineers used curl, traceroute, nping, and custom Python scripts to confirm TCP payload-based blocking after the handshake. The team submitted a request via the VTS personal account, received partial acceptance status, then escalated to DCOA and SSOP to obtain the specific TSPU site number. Detailed network traces and active traffic were required for diagnostics. The case highlights coordination challenges between operators, DCOA, and SSOP when erroneous blocks occur on information resources.

AntiMalware•Policy & Regulation

Security Vision Unveils Self-Assessment Portal for Unified Information Security Evaluation Across Corporate Holdings

Security Vision has launched a new Self-Assessment portal designed to consolidate information security self-evaluations for entire corporate groups and holdings. The platform addresses common challenges where subsidiaries maintain inconsistent compliance records, with some requirements fulfilled while others remain unresolved for years in scattered emails and spreadsheets. Security Vision SA covers the complete workflow from defining requirements and distributing questionnaires to calculating results and tracking remediation actions. Parent organizations gain a consolidated view of subsidiary compliance status along with detailed breakdowns by individual systems. The system supports requirement templates, version control, scheduled assessments, automated metric-based answers, and conversion of gaps into actionable plans with assigned owners and deadlines. Additional features include internal policy document management and interactive dashboards for analysis. The first public demonstration is scheduled for the SOC Forum on October 27-28.