AntiMalwareSeptember 3, 2026🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Booking.com Security Overlooked Fake Downing Street Listing in Which? Fraud Test

Researchers from the consumer organization Which? created a fraudulent listing on Booking.com offering a one-bedroom apartment at 10 Downing Street, the official residence of the UK Prime Minister. The ad featured the precise address, photographs of the famous building, and a description promoting it as "one-bedroom accommodation in the heart of London," just four minutes' walk from Parliament.

The listing went live on 18 June, with booking temporarily enabled for the test. Booking.com processed payment for a week-long stay, yet the funds were not returned to the researcher more than six weeks later. A fake review praising an exceptional stay and interaction with Larry, the official mouser at the residence, passed moderation almost immediately.

Through Booking.com's internal messaging system, the researchers sent an external link requesting bank card details under the pretext of confirming the reservation. Despite the company's claims that its systems block suspicious URLs, no intervention occurred. The listing was finally removed on 27 August.

Which? described the results as evidence of systemic failures and urged UK regulator Ofcom to launch an investigation. Editor of Which? Travel Rory Boland stated that if Booking.com's sophisticated AI cannot recognize that 10 Downing Street is not a holiday home, it is unsurprising that fraudsters exploit the platform so easily.

Booking.com responded that the experiment does not reflect the experience of millions of customers and claimed the listing was never publicly available, meaning certain anti-fraud mechanisms were not activated.

Related articles

HabrFraud & Social Engineering

Avito and BI.ZONE Launch Cyberdetective CTF for Non-Technical Employees Focused on Phishing and Social Engineering

Avito's Security Awareness team, in partnership with BI.ZONE, created the Cyberdetective jeopardy-style CTF competition specifically for non-technical staff who do not write code. The three-day event targeted 104 registered participants, with 44 completing tasks and 16 achieving maximum scores across scenarios involving phishing, OAuth consent abuse, file metadata analysis, and prompt injection. Tasks awarded flags not only for investigation but also for refusing risky actions such as granting excessive application permissions or clicking suspicious links. The design incorporated MITRE ATT&CK techniques including T1566.002 Spearphishing Link, T1528 Steal Application Access Token, and T1204.004 Malicious Copy and Paste. Organizers emphasized indirect hints to help participants recognize when an object required action, avoiding the common barrier where employees fail to understand that a strange string or domain needs examination. Feedback highlighted the value of hands-on decision-making over passive lectures, though some technical employees completed the set rapidly.

AntiMalwareFraud & Social Engineering

Paper Mail Combined with Phishing: Russians Targeted by Fake FNS Tax Portal Copies

Russian scammers have started blending traditional postal mail with digital phishing to steal taxpayer credentials. Victims first receive official-looking paper letters from the Federal Tax Service demanding corrections to tax declarations or supporting expense documents. These letters are followed by emails directing users to a counterfeit version of the FNS personal account portal. The fake site captures login details, passwords, and other authentication data that can be reused for further identity theft and account takeovers. Senator Artem Sheikin highlighted the scheme, noting that the paper letter builds initial trust before the electronic follow-up appears legitimate. Users are advised to access tax information only by manually visiting the official FNS website or through the Gosuslugi platform without clicking any links. The attack relies primarily on psychological manipulation rather than technical sophistication.

HabrFraud & Social Engineering

The Human Factor in Phishing: Why Employees Wait Nine Days to Report Credential Theft

A detailed case analysis reveals how an employee clicked a phishing link, entered credentials, and realized the mistake within a minute, yet security teams only discovered the incident nine days later through an automated rule rather than a human report. The delay stemmed from immediate shame and motivated reasoning that allowed the victim to convince themselves no further action was needed, including the false belief that changing the password resolved the issue. This nine-day window left attacker sessions active, permitted potential mailbox forwarding rules to exfiltrate data, and risked rotating logs that erased forensic evidence. The article examines how corporate cultures that frame incidents as blameworthy events actively discourage reporting and turn minor phishing successes into prolonged investigations involving third parties. Recommendations include creating a no-blame reporting policy with clear boundaries, implementing one-click in-client reporting buttons, and shifting metrics from click rates to reporting speed and volume. The analysis stresses that even strong technical detection cannot fully replace rapid human signals when cultural barriers remain unaddressed.

AntiMalwareFraud & Social Engineering

Fake GTA and Ghost Casino Apps Flood Google Play Early Access with Scam Promises

Unscrupulous developers are exploiting Google Play's Early Access program to distribute applications that make false promises of earnings through fake games and casino experiences. These apps lack public ratings and reviews, preventing disappointed users from warning others before installation. Bitdefender reports that the scheme is heavily promoted via advertisements on TikTok, Facebook, and other social networks, often featuring deepfakes of actors, athletes, and celebrities to build credibility. Users are lured with offers of PayPal payments, cryptocurrency, gift cards, and casino jackpots, but the apps deliberately slow progress near withdrawal thresholds. After installation, the software displays generous virtual winnings that never translate into real payouts. The campaign relies on aggressive advertising and misleading interfaces to maximize installations before users realize the fraud.