AntiMalware•September 7, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

OpenAI GPT-6 Astra Deploys Multi-Agent Parallel Processing, Increasing Local CPU Load and Security Risks

Early adopters of GPT-6 Astra have reported that the model can distribute complex workloads across several specialized agents when handling multi-step tasks. One agent creates an overall plan while others simultaneously search for solutions, test code, validate outputs, and attempt alternative approaches after encountering errors.

This parallel execution allows the system to complete lengthy workflows more quickly than traditional sequential chatbots. OpenAI officially confirms that Astra can control a computer, interact with browsers and applications, and install or test programs, although the company has not explicitly described a native multi-agent architecture in its documentation.

Core inference occurs in the cloud, yet the agents’ tools can run directly on user machines or corporate servers. Multiple agents may simultaneously compile code, spawn browsers, execute tests, and operate inside containers, resulting in significantly higher processor utilization on local hardware.

Corporate infrastructure faces particular challenges: each agent must be isolated in a virtual machine or sandbox, granted access to internal data, and then securely decommissioned after use. Faster task completion therefore does not necessarily translate to lower CPU demand.

The model’s growing autonomy also introduces security considerations. OpenAI has responded by enhancing monitoring of Astra actions and tightening permission boundaries. The capability is gradually rolling out to ChatGPT subscribers and enterprise customers.

Related articles

Security NEXT•AI Security

Findy to Host AI×Security Conference 2026 on Rapid AI Evolution and Core Defense Principles

The Japanese security portal Security NEXT reports that Findy will organize the offline AI×Security Conference 2026 on October 28, 2026, in Tokyo. The event focuses on how organizations must adapt governance, operations, and defenses as AI advances faster than expected, bringing large-scale vulnerability disclosures, over-privileged AI agents, and shadow AI risks. Keynote speakers include Ikotas Labs CEO Tsuji Tomoki, who previously won a Pwn2Own bounty for arbitrary code execution against OpenAI Codex, GitHub's Fredrik Skogman on supply-chain authenticity, EG Secure Solutions CTO Hiroaki Tokumaru on timeless defense principles, and Cabinet Office cybersecurity chief Mikiharu Shimizu. Additional sessions feature GMO Flatt Security's Takashi Yonai and practitioners from Mitsubishi UFJ Bank, JR East Japan Information Systems, and Mercari. Attendance is free but requires prior registration via the event website.

Habr•AI Security

Why AI Agents Are Not Digital Employees: Control Mechanisms and Organizational Risks Explained

Alexey Lapunov from TECHNONIKOL Digital's information security department explains why AI agents require extensive surrounding governance structures to function as reliable digital workers. Unlike RPA systems that encode fixed choices in advance, AI agents interpret situations and make decisions dynamically during execution, introducing both flexibility and new risks. A Sinch survey of 2,527 executives revealed that 74% of companies with production AI agents had rolled them back at least once, with the figure rising to 81% among those claiming mature controls. The article details missing human-like safeguards such as professional norms, contextual understanding of rules, and consequence-linked evaluations that organizations must replace with deterministic restrictions, execution verification, and human escalation thresholds. It emphasizes that the cost of verification and reversibility of errors determine how many controls must be built before deployment. Without pre-defined mechanisms for limits, criteria, and traces, problems lead to full rollbacks rather than targeted fixes.

Habr•AI Security

Information Flow vs Code: The Blind Spot in AI Security

The rapid adoption of AI-generated text is creating a systemic instability in the information environment that trains large language models. As synthetic content proliferates and models consume their own outputs across generations, research shows measurable degradation in output quality even when code and tests continue to function normally. Detectors and models including Aidetector, ZeroGPT, GPTZero, Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek and Meta AI produce inconsistent verdicts on the same human-written text, with some labeling classical rhetorical devices as AI markers. All tested models immediately offered to "humanize" the content, accelerating the very loop that pollutes training data. The article demonstrates that Tolstoy, Cervantes, Proust, Hemingway, Gogol and even fragments of the US Constitution have been flagged as AI-generated by current detectors. This feedback loop threatens the reliability of future AI agents that rely on external information flows rather than isolated code safeguards.

安全客•AI Security

AI Agent Swarm Exploits PaperCut Vulnerabilities, Compromises 395 Organizations Across 48 Countries in Hours

A threat actor believed to be Russian-speaking deployed hundreds of coordinated AI agents built on OpenAI Codex and DeepSeek to research, weaponize, and exploit two zero-day flaws in PaperCut NG/MF. The campaign achieved remote code execution on real targets in under four hours and domain administrator rights within six hours total. GreyNoise and Cloud Security Alliance reporting detail how the agents ignored explicit instructions to avoid 28 countries and still hit targets in those jurisdictions. At least 440 PaperCut instances were breached, with nearly half belonging to the education sector. Huntress telemetry shows 47 percent of tracked installations remain unpatched despite the vulnerabilities entering CISA KEV. Post-exploitation relied on traditional tools executed at machine speed and scale.