Why Simple ChatGPT Wrappers Are Losing Value: AI Model Makers Integrate Features, Pushing Startups to Control Full Industry Processes
Early startups that attempted to wrap access to large language models like ChatGPT and sell them as standalone products are quickly losing relevance. Developers of foundational AI systems are now integrating the very capabilities that once formed the core of these young companies' offerings.
According to the venture capital firm NFX, startups should abandon simple overlays on third-party models and instead seize control of entire industry processes. Rather than building narrow tools for lawyers, companies are creating comprehensive AI-powered legal services, and instead of isolated procurement applications, they aim to manage full supply chains.
The first wave of such wrappers emerged shortly after the launch of ChatGPT. These tools generated advertising copy, responded to customers, supported sales teams, and extracted information from legal documents. The companies behind them assumed that base models would remain unable to handle specialized tasks independently for a long time.
That calculation did not hold. OpenAI, Anthropic, and other model developers began transforming their systems into complete working products. Features that assist with programming, document work, and content creation have become native parts of major platforms, stripping smaller single-task companies of their primary differentiation.
One of the most prominent examples is Jasper. In 2022 the company raised $125 million at a $1.5 billion valuation and was viewed as a leader in AI advertising copy generation. It later lowered its annual revenue forecast, reduced headcount, and shifted direction, now attempting to evolve into a full marketing platform.
More durable approaches have come from companies that treat AI as the foundation of an entire service rather than a single feature. The legal platform EvenUp focuses on personal injury cases and has expanded to prepare documents, process case materials, and manage additional workflow stages. NFX reports that more than 2,000 law firms now use the service.
Another example is Blitzy, which builds enterprise software to replace contractor teams. The system analyzes a customer's entire codebase, breaks large projects into smaller tasks, and selects appropriate models for each step, capturing internal dependencies that generic models might overlook without domain-specific preparation.
The mortgage service Tomo has gone further by automating sales, borrower verification, and daily operations. The company states that 77% of its clients receive better interest rates than those offered by traditional mortgage providers, demonstrating a strategy of replacing legacy processes rather than layering new software on top of them.
Seso has adopted a similar model for managing seasonal agricultural workers in the United States. Previously, employee records, visa information, and documentation were scattered across law firms, office software, and paper files. With more advanced models, Seso now also handles transportation, housing, business insights, and personnel decision support.
Large organizations can also integrate AI directly with model developers. The law firm Freshfields, for instance, has partnered with Anthropic to build specialized tools, although such initiatives demand substantial compute spending and dedicated technical staff, and automation remains only one part of their traditional business.
NFX believes younger companies can still win by specializing deeply in narrow niches. Industry expertise, accumulated data, established sales relationships, and control over every stage of a service are significantly harder to copy than isolated software functions. As universal models grow stronger, the value of simple wrappers diminishes, making the ability to convert AI capabilities into complete, operational businesses increasingly critical.
Related articles
Selectel Revenue Exceeds 10 Billion Rubles as Cloud Services Drive Growth Amid Rising Costs
Selectel reported revenue of 10.2 billion rubles for the first half of 2026, marking a 14 percent increase compared with the same period a year earlier. Cloud infrastructure services remained the primary growth engine, contributing 8.9 billion rubles or 87 percent of total revenue. The customer base expanded by 14,400 clients over twelve months to reach 44,500, with smaller customers fueling much of the increase through new VDS configurations. Professional services showed the fastest consumption growth at 1.4 times, while financial and IT sectors raised infrastructure spending by 1.3 times. Adjusted EBITDA rose only 3 percent to 5.4 billion rubles, lowering its margin from 59 percent to 53 percent, and net profit stayed nearly flat at 1.9 billion rubles with margin declining from 21 percent to 18 percent. Operating expenses jumped 23 percent to 4.7 billion rubles, driven mainly by payroll costs that accounted for 65 percent of the total. The company invested 6.4 billion rubles in development, including 4.4 billion rubles on server equipment, a 1.8-fold increase, while expanding GPU purchases for AI workloads despite higher component prices, resulting in negative free cash flow of 3.4 billion rubles and a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.1.
Russian Backup Market Hits 10.6 Billion Rubles as Domestic Solutions Reach 70% Share
The Russian market for backup solutions grew 18.5% in 2025 to reach 10.6 billion rubles, outpacing the overall infrastructure software segment which expanded 16%. Domestic vendors increased their share from 19% in 2021 to 70% in 2025, with analysts from Strategy Partners forecasting further growth to 92% by 2030 and a market size of 24 billion rubles. Cyberprotect maintains the leading position with its Cyber Backup product, while Astra Group’s RuBackup is noted as another significant offering. The company itself estimates the market at approximately 12 billion rubles and claims a 56% share. Competition is shifting from feature lists toward compatibility with Russian virtualization platforms, databases, Kubernetes environments, storage systems, and monitoring tools. The broader infrastructure software market reached 158 billion rubles in 2025, with Russian developers holding 68% compared to just 8% four years earlier.
Google Issues Clear 2026 Guidance: No Separate SEO for AI Overviews or AI Mode
Google has published dedicated documentation clarifying that optimization for generative search features remains standard SEO. The company stresses that pages must be crawlable, indexable, relevant to user intent, and contain reliable information that the system can extract and synthesize. While classic ranking still applies, generative systems now evaluate pages across multiple stages including retrieval, fact extraction, cross-referencing, and citation decisions. Google explicitly rejects the need for llms.txt files, special AI-oriented Schema markup, or content rewritten specifically for language models. Instead, the focus is on non-commodity content that provides unique data, concrete metrics, and genuine user value. The guidance also warns against scaled content abuse and doorway-style pages created solely to capture long-tail AI-generated queries.
Wildberries and Ozon to Accept Digital Rubles from September 1, 2026
Major Russian marketplaces Wildberries and Ozon will begin accepting digital rubles for purchases starting September 1, 2026. Ozon plans to introduce the new payment option first in a testing phase alongside bank cards and other methods before gradually rolling it out to all customers. Wildberries confirmed it will comply with requirements from the Bank of Russia and existing regulations without providing further details. From the same date, major banks must enable clients to open digital wallets, transfer funds, and pay for goods through their regular banking apps connected to the Central Bank platform. Operations with digital rubles will remain free for citizens. The rollout is mandatory for large merchants with annual revenue exceeding 120 million rubles that are served by major banks, with smaller businesses facing obligations in subsequent years based on revenue thresholds.