CAR-T Therapy Expands Beyond Leukemia: GPNMB Protein Emerges as Promising Target for Glioblastoma and Rare Soft Tissue Sarcoma
CAR-T therapy has revolutionized the treatment of certain blood cancers, yet it has struggled to achieve comparable success against solid tumors of internal organs. The core challenge lies not in the immune cells themselves but in identifying reliable molecular targets. Cells within solid tumors vary widely in their surface protein profiles, allowing therapy-resistant subpopulations to drive disease recurrence.
Two independent research groups have now converged on the same surface protein, GPNMB, as a promising solution that addresses multiple obstacles simultaneously. Genetically modified lymphocytes targeting GPNMB successfully eliminated glioblastoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma cells in laboratory models, slowed tumor growth in mice, and, in one project, were administered to a human patient for the first time.
How CAR-T Therapy Works
CAR-T treatment begins with a patient’s own T-lymphocytes, which are extracted from blood, genetically engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), and then reinfused. The CAR functions as a highly specific sensor that recognizes a pre-selected molecule on the surface of cancer cells, enabling the lymphocytes to locate and destroy them. While this approach has proven highly effective for leukemias and some lymphomas—where most malignant cells share a common surface protein—it has been far less successful against solid tumors.
Overcoming Solid-Tumor Barriers
Solid tumors present two major difficulties. First, even within a single tumor, different cells express different surface proteins, so some escape attack and continue proliferating. Second, the tumor microenvironment—composed of connective tissue, blood vessels, and immune cells—often suppresses anti-tumor responses and hinders CAR-T function. Researchers therefore sought a target present on both tumor cells and the immune cells that shield the tumor.
Glioblastoma Study Highlights Dual Attack
One team focused on glioblastoma, the most aggressive brain tumor. By comparing patient samples, scientists identified GPNMB as the most promising surface protein on the most dangerous tumor cells. After genetic modification, the resulting CAR-T cells nearly completely eradicated tumor cells grown from patient tissues. In mouse experiments, treatment slowed disease progression and extended survival. Importantly, GPNMB was also expressed on immune cells that normally help the tumor evade destruction, allowing the therapy to attack both the tumor and its protective microenvironment.
Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma Research and First-in-Human Use
The second study examined alveolar soft part sarcoma, a rare and aggressive soft-tissue cancer often driven by a fusion gene. Screening again pointed to GPNMB, whose expression correlated directly with the activity of the fusion gene. CAR-T cells targeting this protein eliminated tumors and blocked metastasis formation in mice. Prior to human testing, researchers confirmed safety using mice engrafted with human skin; only transient inflammation occurred, with no lasting tissue damage. The therapy was then given to a patient with recurrent, metastatic disease. A single infusion led to rapid expansion of the modified lymphocytes, which persisted for about a month without severe cytokine-release syndrome or other major complications. Imaging showed reduction in lung metastases and disease stabilization lasting approximately three months.
Future Directions and Limitations
Both teams noted that adding drugs to block remaining immunosuppressive cells further enhanced tumor clearance in mouse models. The researchers conclude that effective CAR-T targets should be sought not only on cancer cells but also on the immune cells that support tumor growth. While GPNMB is not yet a universal solution and clinical data remain limited to a single patient, the independent validation across two different solid-tumor types marks a significant step toward expanding CAR-T therapy beyond leukemia.
Related articles
Selectel Revenue Exceeds 10 Billion Rubles as Cloud Services Drive Growth Amid Rising Costs
Selectel reported revenue of 10.2 billion rubles for the first half of 2026, marking a 14 percent increase compared with the same period a year earlier. Cloud infrastructure services remained the primary growth engine, contributing 8.9 billion rubles or 87 percent of total revenue. The customer base expanded by 14,400 clients over twelve months to reach 44,500, with smaller customers fueling much of the increase through new VDS configurations. Professional services showed the fastest consumption growth at 1.4 times, while financial and IT sectors raised infrastructure spending by 1.3 times. Adjusted EBITDA rose only 3 percent to 5.4 billion rubles, lowering its margin from 59 percent to 53 percent, and net profit stayed nearly flat at 1.9 billion rubles with margin declining from 21 percent to 18 percent. Operating expenses jumped 23 percent to 4.7 billion rubles, driven mainly by payroll costs that accounted for 65 percent of the total. The company invested 6.4 billion rubles in development, including 4.4 billion rubles on server equipment, a 1.8-fold increase, while expanding GPU purchases for AI workloads despite higher component prices, resulting in negative free cash flow of 3.4 billion rubles and a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.1.
Russian Backup Market Hits 10.6 Billion Rubles as Domestic Solutions Reach 70% Share
The Russian market for backup solutions grew 18.5% in 2025 to reach 10.6 billion rubles, outpacing the overall infrastructure software segment which expanded 16%. Domestic vendors increased their share from 19% in 2021 to 70% in 2025, with analysts from Strategy Partners forecasting further growth to 92% by 2030 and a market size of 24 billion rubles. Cyberprotect maintains the leading position with its Cyber Backup product, while Astra Group’s RuBackup is noted as another significant offering. The company itself estimates the market at approximately 12 billion rubles and claims a 56% share. Competition is shifting from feature lists toward compatibility with Russian virtualization platforms, databases, Kubernetes environments, storage systems, and monitoring tools. The broader infrastructure software market reached 158 billion rubles in 2025, with Russian developers holding 68% compared to just 8% four years earlier.
Google Issues Clear 2026 Guidance: No Separate SEO for AI Overviews or AI Mode
Google has published dedicated documentation clarifying that optimization for generative search features remains standard SEO. The company stresses that pages must be crawlable, indexable, relevant to user intent, and contain reliable information that the system can extract and synthesize. While classic ranking still applies, generative systems now evaluate pages across multiple stages including retrieval, fact extraction, cross-referencing, and citation decisions. Google explicitly rejects the need for llms.txt files, special AI-oriented Schema markup, or content rewritten specifically for language models. Instead, the focus is on non-commodity content that provides unique data, concrete metrics, and genuine user value. The guidance also warns against scaled content abuse and doorway-style pages created solely to capture long-tail AI-generated queries.
Wildberries and Ozon to Accept Digital Rubles from September 1, 2026
Major Russian marketplaces Wildberries and Ozon will begin accepting digital rubles for purchases starting September 1, 2026. Ozon plans to introduce the new payment option first in a testing phase alongside bank cards and other methods before gradually rolling it out to all customers. Wildberries confirmed it will comply with requirements from the Bank of Russia and existing regulations without providing further details. From the same date, major banks must enable clients to open digital wallets, transfer funds, and pay for goods through their regular banking apps connected to the Central Bank platform. Operations with digital rubles will remain free for citizens. The rollout is mandatory for large merchants with annual revenue exceeding 120 million rubles that are served by major banks, with smaller businesses facing obligations in subsequent years based on revenue thresholds.