GitHub and PyPI Introduce Time-Based Defenses Against Supply Chain Attacks
GitHub and PyPI have activated new time-based barriers to slow down supply chain attacks. Dependabot now waits a default of 72 hours before proposing version updates, while PyPI rejects new files added to releases older than 14 days.
The platforms introduced the changes in recent weeks with a shared goal: inserting time delays to reduce the typical damage from supply chain attacks. In Dependabot, the GitHub bot for managing dependencies, the update appears as a default 72-hour wait before opening a pull request when a new package version is released.
In PyPI, the central repository for the Python ecosystem, the platform has rejected uploads of new files since July if the release was published more than 14 days earlier. The Dependabot adjustment does not aim to block urgent patches. The wait applies only to version updates that are not considered security-related. Security updates remain immediate to avoid penalizing critical fixes when risk is already identified.
The objective is to prevent a project from absorbing a freshly published version within minutes that has not yet passed the community’s natural filter, or that an attacker may have inserted after compromising an account or publication workflow. Teams relying on automation will notice the change in cadence. The wait can be adjusted or disabled with the cooldown option in the dependabot.yml file, which is relevant for repositories with strict maintenance windows or their own validation processes. GitHub Enterprise Server will also incorporate the feature, with deployment planned for GHES 3.23.
In PyPI, the 14-day restriction targets a tactic that has caused problems: poisoning of older and stable versions. If an attacker obtains publication tokens or access to a poorly protected CI/CD pipeline, they can attempt to upload a new artifact to a past version with the same number but different content. This complicates audits and breaks basic assumptions in many build environments. The change was integrated on July 8 2026 and was adopted after debate returned to the forefront in March following compromises in projects such as LiteLLM and Telnyx linked to a mutable reference when using the GitHub Action Trivy.
PyPI acknowledges that the ecosystem still lacks standardized semantics and APIs to declare whether a release is open or closed. The platform anticipates progress through initiatives such as Upload 2.0 API and Staged Previews, which should enable more secure workflows without relying solely on rigid rules.
Related articles
OIDC Configured but GitHub Actions Still Vulnerable: Megalodon and actions-cool Attacks Expose Runner Risks
Even after widespread adoption of OIDC for temporary cloud credentials in GitHub Actions, two major attacks in May 2026 demonstrated that the approach remains insufficient on its own. Attackers compromised actions-cool/issues-helper by substituting action tags to execute malicious commits that read Runner.Worker memory. The Megalodon campaign injected malicious workflows into 5,561 public repositories, harvesting environment variables, credential files, kubeconfig, SSH keys, and OIDC tokens. OIDC eliminates long-lived AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID secrets but leaves short-lived tokens exposed inside the runner during job execution. Four mandatory protection layers are now required: strict cloud trust policies using StringEquals on the sub claim, job-level id-token: write permissions, outbound traffic controls such as Harden-Runner, and CODEOWNERS enforcement on .github/workflows/. GitHub Environments with mandatory reviewers add an essential human-approval gate that would have disrupted the Megalodon attack path.
GitHub Repo Trap with 1774 Stars Mimics Microsoft Activation Scripts to Deliver Malware via Telegram Bot
A security researcher built a Telegram bot that daily delivers five trending GitHub repositories from trendshift.io along with README summaries. One repository named Microsoft Activation Scripts contained only a README with a reversed PowerShell command that decoded to download and execute a payload from a lookalike domain. The account was created 94 seconds before the repository and used classic one-liner installation syntax to blend with legitimate projects. Analysis of 321 trending repositories showed that simple filters such as recent account age or irm|iex patterns would incorrectly flag many legitimate projects including codex and opencode. Two independent detection rules were developed: one that normalizes and scans for obfuscated execution commands including base64, mshta, certutil and hidden window flags, and another that flags one-time owners created less than 30 days before the repository with under 10 KB of content. An additional groundedness check using the AIHOT method prevents DeepSeek from inserting unverified claims such as Ruby or Cypress into repository summaries.
GhostAction Campaign Expands to Inject Malicious GitHub Workflows Stealing AWS Keys and Tokens
The GhostAction campaign has returned with an expanded technique that targets a wider range of credentials across hundreds of repositories. On October 8, two compromised maintainer accounts injected a malicious workflow named security-audit.yml into 346 GitHub repositories, including high-profile projects such as uber/athenadriver and kitao/pyxel. The workflow disguises itself as a security audit routine and executes automatically on every code push, exfiltrating credentials via HTTP requests to attacker-controlled servers. Unlike previous waves that only harvested GitHub Actions secrets, the new version also scans the working directory and full git history for forgotten credentials in older commits. Targeted data includes AWS access keys, GitHub and GitLab tokens, Google API keys, Slack and SendGrid tokens, OpenAI and Anthropic credentials, PyPI passwords, and crates.io tokens. Since October 7, more than 500 GitHub accounts have planted similar workflows, building on earlier campaigns that affected 817 repositories in September 2025 and 772 between August and September.
Security Researcher Builds SAST Scanner for AI-Generated Code and Audits 3,800 Public Repositories
A developer released AigisSAST, a lightweight open-source static analysis tool written in pure Python with no external dependencies, specifically tuned to detect common mistakes made by AI coding assistants. The scanner was run across roughly 3,800 repositories ranging from small pet projects to popular open-source platforms. It identified thousands of potential secrets and misconfigurations, yet manual review reduced the number of genuine leaks to approximately 30 cases, mostly Telegram bot tokens, database credentials, and committed .env files. The project also examined 471 production-grade Telegram bots handling payments and VPN services, uncovering 31 repositories that exposed real credentials either in current code or in Git history. AigisSAST includes 21 detection rules, 193 regression tests, automatic remediation via the fix command, and seamless integration with GitHub Actions. The author deliberately avoided validating any discovered keys to stay within ethical research boundaries.