Neural Networks Without Magic: 80-Year History, Business Applications, and Why They Will Not Replace Experts Overnight
Vasily Ryazanov, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences and head of the Data Science team at Twinby, sat down with journalist Alexander Shulepov to separate hype from practical value in neural networks. The conversation covers the technology’s long history, how contemporary language models operate, real business deployments, and the persistent need for human expertise.
From family history to Data Science: why neural networks entered his life long before ChatGPT
Ryazanov explains that his path began in the 1970s when his father worked on artificial intelligence and pattern recognition under academician Zhuravlev at the Academy of Sciences after finishing graduate studies around 1977. Early networks processed tables of only hundreds or thousands of rows on computers that ran for hours. By the 2000s the workflow had become clearer: load tabular data, train an algorithm, and obtain results, often written in C++.
He stresses that neural networks are not 10–20 years old but approximately 80 years old. Interest has risen and fallen in waves, with renewed attention around 2014–2015 driven by advances in image recognition, face detection, and projects such as Google DeepDream.
How TikTok became a professional platform
Ryazanov began posting on TikTok in 2019. Initial experiments with monowheel videos and song translations did not stick; a friend’s suggestion to discuss remote work and Data Science produced his first successful clip. The platform’s recommendation engine, which analyzes watch time, likes, on-screen content, speech, and music, quickly matched his material with an interested audience.
Skills and education required
For engineers and data scientists, Ryazanov insists on a solid foundation in probability theory, linear algebra, statistics, programming, and data handling. Entrepreneurs and marketers need only a clear understanding of capabilities, limitations, and data-handling rules. His own education at MIPT remains essential because much of his current work involves code and model training rather than simple prompting.
Distinguishing artificial intelligence, neural networks, and ChatGPT
Artificial intelligence is the broad goal of automating tasks associated with human thinking. Neural networks are one mathematical approach inspired by biological neurons. ChatGPT is a conversational system built on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer architecture; it predicts the next token while respecting dialogue history, safety constraints, and other controls.
Training begins with enormous datasets and GPU clusters to create a base model, followed by domain-specific fine-tuning or connection to corporate data. The cost of training frontier-scale models is dominated by GPUs, electricity, cooling, and infrastructure.
Prompts, Claude, and paid tiers
A prompt is simply a textual instruction that may assign a role, state goals, specify output format, and supply source material. Ryazanov prefers natural conversation with models, often dictating thoughts via keyboard while walking. He uses Claude most frequently because it maintains long context well and produces precise phrasing; ChatGPT remains useful for its multimodal features. Paid plans mainly remove rate limits and provide priority access during peak load.
Hallucinations, confidentiality, and the “AI psychologist” trap
Common beginner mistakes include uploading sensitive documents and placing excessive trust in fluent answers. Models can invent films, misattribute works, or cite nonexistent papers. Ryazanov warns against sending passports, medical records, trade secrets, or proprietary code to external services. When the cost of error is high—in health, finance, law, or safety—every output must be verified against primary sources and domain experts.
Although models can help structure reflections or prepare questions for a therapist or physician, they are not substitutes for professional care. The convenience of receiving a personalized summary in minutes makes the interface psychologically compelling, increasing the risk of over-reliance.
Related articles
From Web Perimeter Breaches to Domain Takeover: How Standoff Hackbase Trains Pentesters on Real Corporate Infrastructure
wr3dmast3r, a senior pentester and BSCP certification guide author, rose to first place on the Standoff Hackbase ranking by shifting focus from initial perimeter access to full internal infrastructure compromise. The platform replicates large-scale corporate networks from various industries, forcing participants to map service relationships, harvest credentials, escalate privileges, and chain pivots across segments. Unlike CTF challenges that end with a single flag, Hackbase tasks require building complete attack paths that can lead to data theft, process disruption, or cross-domain movement. The interview highlights practical techniques such as time-boxing hypotheses, manually modeling infrastructure after automated scans, and using AI only as an information accelerator rather than an autonomous operator. wr3dmast3r also details a memorable chain that began with a bot, moved through VPN and Outlook access, leveraged SCCM tokens for privilege escalation, and ended with compromise of a second domain containing the target system.
OTUS Publishes September Digest of Free Lessons on Linux Administration, PostgreSQL, CI/CD and Infrastructure Security
OTUS has released a new digest listing free September webinars aimed at infrastructure engineers, DevOps specialists and system administrators. The program covers practical topics including Linux server configuration, PostgreSQL 18 performance tuning, high-availability clusters with Patroni, CI/CD pipelines in GitLab, eBPF observability and infrastructure security practices. All sessions are delivered by practicing OTUS instructors who share real-world production experience. Separate tracks address RAID and LVM management, GPO policies, release management in 1C environments, Go profiling, mitmproxy traffic analysis and responsible use of AI tools for incident investigation and code review. The webinars run throughout September at 19:00 or 20:00 Moscow time and require only free registration. The digest also includes sessions on career growth from tech lead to CTO and effective responsibility distribution for team leads.
Top LLMs Misidentify Poisonous Mushrooms in Every Ninth Case, Benchmark Shows
Polish developer Piotr Migdal evaluated leading large language models on their ability to identify mushrooms from photographs, using a dataset of 1040 images covering 55 species common in Poland. The images came from the FungiTastic dataset derived from the Atlas of Danish Fungi, with expert labels and partial DNA confirmation. Models were asked to return the five most likely species names in Latin without additional training or tools. Gemini 3.8 Flash performed best with 65 percent top-1 accuracy and 85 percent top-5 accuracy, followed closely by other Gemini variants. However, safety-critical errors remained high: Gemini models labeled poisonous mushrooms as edible in roughly 11 percent of cases, while GPT-5.6 Sol reached 24 percent, Claude Opus 5 reached 29 percent, and Qwen 3.8 27B reached 36 percent. The study did not ask models directly whether a mushroom was edible; species identifications were later cross-checked against toxicity tables.
September 2026 AI Model Rankings: Fable 5.1 Tops Intelligence Index as Competition Tightens Across GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6 and Muse Spark 1.3
The beginning of September 2026 marked a rare moment when the list of top language models had to be almost entirely rewritten. Anthropic released Fable 5.1 and the limited Mythos 5.1, while Meta updated Muse Spark to version 1.3, Google introduced Gemini 3.8 Flash, and Alibaba refreshed Qwen3.8-Max. Existing models including GPT-5.6 Sol, Grok 4.6, Kimi K3, GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro remain competitive. Traditional rankings from smartest to least capable have become difficult because modern models operate in multiple reasoning-depth modes where low, high and max settings can differ by ten or more points on the same test. The market is better viewed as several overlapping races where Fable 5.1 leads in complex reasoning quality, GPT-5.6 Sol and Grok 4.6 deliver near-top performance at lower cost, and Muse Spark 1.3 excels in price-performance. Independent Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index scores, context windows, API pricing and tool-use capabilities now determine practical choices more than raw benchmark numbers.