Habr•August 18, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

The Tale of Active Directory Domain Sabotage: Architect Plants DNS-Killing Task on Departing Branch Controllers

In a medium-complexity case study originally posted on Habr, an architect recounts events from an old Windows Server 2003 Active Directory domain that spanned 15–20 regional branches, each equipped with its own domain controller linked to headquarters via VPN tunnels, sometimes using GSM modems.

When two branches prepared to split off, the architect was asked by senior management to implement a discreet mechanism that would disrupt operations if the separation occurred. The solution involved placing a monitoring script deep in the file system of the branch controllers and scheduling it via Task Scheduler under an innocuous foreign name.

The script used alive.exe to ping a headquarters IP address twice daily. Successful pings reset a hidden registry counter; repeated failures incremented the counter. A second scheduled task running every 10–15 days checked the counter and, once it exceeded 15, executed net stop dns, causing the domain to become unusable for branch users arriving at work the next morning.

To reduce forensic traces, the architect created a temporary task running as SYSTEM that relocated the scripts, recreated the scheduled tasks under SYSTEM ownership, and then deleted the original task. After the branches departed, the DNS service was observed stopping three times; the local network engineer restarted it each time before finally calling the architect.

The architect concluded that Active Directory becomes inoperable the moment the DNS service stops and that the domain administrator is the single greatest danger to the domain’s existence because of the breadth of privileges available.

Related articles

Habr•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Automating Asset Scanning in MaxPatrol VM via API: Part 4 on Authentication

A detailed technical guide explains how to build asset scanning automation in MaxPatrol VM using its API, starting with authentication methods. The author covers three authorization options including local account login-password, domain account credentials, and reference tokens, providing working Python examples for local accounts. Code reads secrets from an .env file and obtains a Bearer token valid for 24 hours from the Core role instance. The post details required privileges in both the Management Console and MaxPatrol 10 for tasks such as vulnerability exports, dynamic asset group management, scan task creation, and report exporting. It credits Alexey Leonov for an early GitHub script that enabled practical API usage and lists additional resources including webinars, SDK, CLI, Jira integration, and a Postman collection. All subsequent API calls rely on the generated headers containing the Bearer token.

Habr•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Securing Hadoop Clusters: Removing Passwords from XML Configs with Credential Provider API and JCEKS

Hadoop configurations frequently expose sensitive credentials such as database passwords and cloud access keys in plain text within files like hive-site.xml and core-site.xml. The Credential Provider API, introduced in Hadoop 2.6, allows applications to retrieve secrets from an external JCEKS keystore instead of embedding them directly in XML. This mechanism uses conf.getPassword() to fetch decrypted values from the keystore when hadoop.security.credential.provider.path is configured. JCEKS relies on the outdated PBEWithMD5AndTripleDES algorithm, which remains vulnerable to Sweet32 attacks in theory though practical risk for small keystore files is low. Master password protection for the keystore itself is the weakest link, with options including environment variables, protected password files, or HDFS Transparent Data Encryption. Arenadata has automated credential encryption management in its ADH platform through ADCM to handle keystore creation, permission setting, and rotation across cluster nodes.

Security NEXT•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

CISA Adds Five Exploited Vulnerabilities to KEV Catalog Including AhsayCBS Authentication and Command Injection Flaws

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added five vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog after confirming active exploitation in the wild. Four vulnerabilities were registered on October 14, 2026, and one additional entry followed on October 15. Among the newly listed issues are two critical flaws affecting the AhsayCBS backup management server: CVE-2026-105133, an authentication bypass in the API, and CVE-2026-105134, a command injection vulnerability in the replication feature. When chained together, the pair allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands. Vendor Ahsay has released hotfixes in versions 10.3.4.45 and 9.15.2.70 because standard patches cannot fully address the issues. The advisory also references vulnerabilities in Atlassian products and multiple network security solutions from other vendors.

Security NEXT•Vulnerabilities & Exploits

Google Issues Chrome Security Update Fixing Critical Vulnerability Two Days After Previous Patch

Google has released a new set of security updates for its Chrome browser that address ten vulnerabilities, including one rated critical. The update arrives just two days after a larger patch that fixed 37 issues on October 13. The most severe flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-110922, is a use-after-free vulnerability in the Prerender feature that could allow remote code execution. The company released Chrome 155.0.8059.85 and 155.0.8059.84 for Windows and macOS, along with Chrome 155.0.8059.84 for Linux on October 15. The critical issue was reported by an external researcher on October 2. Deployment will occur gradually over the next several days to weeks.