Bot Traffic Overtakes Human Traffic in 2024 as AI Agents and Scrapers Surge
The theory of a so-called dead internet has circulated since at least 2014, but recent data shows automated traffic is indeed overtaking human activity. Anti-detect browser company Aurorium examined traffic composition from 2013 onward and concluded that bots now hold a majority share in many segments.
Modern internet traffic consists of human users who create content and drive searches, plus bots divided into good, bad, and gray categories. Good bots include search engine crawlers, uptime monitors, news aggregators, and social media bots. Bad bots range from simple scripts to advanced tools that rotate fingerprints, use proxies, and mimic human mouse movements. Gray bots encompass AI agents and neural crawlers whose long-term value to webmasters remains unclear.
Imperva statistics illustrate the shift. Human traffic stood at 57 percent in 2013, dipped in 2014 due to good-bot indexing, then recovered through 2019 as smartphone adoption and 4G networks brought hundreds of millions of new users from Asia. From 2020 onward, pandemic-driven automation reversed the trend. By 2023 human traffic had fallen to 50.4 percent while malicious bots climbed to 32 percent.
The acceleration continued after generative AI tools lowered the barrier to creating scrapers. In 2024 human traffic dropped below 50 percent for the first time, reaching 49 percent against 51 percent automated. Latest figures show humans at 47 percent and bots at 53 percent, with the majority of bot activity classified as harmful scraping rather than beneficial indexing.
Additional sources align with these findings. Cloudflare reports that automated requests account for 37.5 percent of HTTP traffic, 87 percent of which originates from desktop environments. Akamai analyzed 6.9 billion requests and found 49.3 percent human, 42.1 percent bot-driven, and 65.3 percent of bot traffic tied to malicious scraping.
Within the bad-bot category, gray AI agents represent a fast-growing subset. AI crawlers comprise 85 percent of neural traffic while interactive AI agents account for 15 percent and are expanding at roughly 7 percent per year. These agents already compare prices, read documentation, and complete bookings with minimal human input.
Businesses bear an infrastructure tax from this traffic. A site that once handled 200 daily visitors may now serve 5,000, forcing upgrades to costlier hosting plans even though a large share of requests come from non-converting bots. For a digital property with 100 million monthly views and 30 percent bot traffic, annual server costs attributable to automation can exceed $19,000, excluding expenses for CAPTCHA services.
Site owners face difficult choices about blocking AI crawlers. Aggressive filtering risks losing legitimate mobile users sharing the same carrier-grade NAT addresses. At the same time, media organizations such as BBC and CNN that strictly limit AI access still achieve high citation rates in neural search results, suggesting that voluntary openness may not be required for visibility.
The cumulative data lends increasing weight to the dead-internet hypothesis. Human users are becoming a minority in the network they created, and recommendation systems trained on bot-generated patterns risk producing an increasingly synthetic information environment with no clear reversal in sight.
Related articles
Building Your First Home Network Lab: Essential Tools and Experiments to Understand Corporate Networks
A cybersecurity professional without network knowledge resembles a guard without a building blueprint, spotting alarms but unable to trace the intruder. Setting up a personal lab on a standard computer bridges this gap through virtualization and hands-on practice with protocols and attacks. The guide recommends GNS3 for topology emulation, VirtualBox or VMware for running Windows and Linux workstations, Cisco Packet Tracer for quick simulations, Wireshark for traffic analysis, and draw.io for diagramming. Key experiments include configuring Cisco IOS routers with IP addressing, testing default gateways, observing ARP requests and replies, triggering broadcast storms via switch loops, and enabling STP to prevent loops. The lab demonstrates how legacy protocols like ARP expose networks to spoofing and why segmentation with VLANs and firewalls matters. Resources from CyberED provide demo access to courses on SOC analysis, penetration testing, and AI applications in security to extend learning.
PSLC and Agent-Ops: From Product Support to Infrastructure Transformation
Sergey Zhitinsky, founder of Git in Sky, attended the OPS Talk by Sber meetup on October 19 and discussed the PSLC methodology with architect Alexander Shapovalov. PSLC, or Product Service Lifecycle, outlines two loops for restoring services immediately and improving reliability to prevent recurrence through teams, knowledge, and platform support. Agent-Ops focuses on eight detailed steps for individual infrastructure tasks: intention, evidence collection, diagnostics, planning, approval, controlled change, verification, and lessons learned. The article illustrates their complementary use in a scenario where post-release log growth fills a database disk, requiring both service restoration and root-cause fixes. Both approaches emphasize knowledge retention, action control, and human accountability, though Agent-Ops v0.5.1 mandates explicit human approval and separate execution for production changes. PSLC suits larger organizations with shared platforms, while Agent-Ops targets smaller teams handling infrastructure operations with AI agents.
Russian Organizations Allocate 4.5 Trillion Rubles to Innovation Spending in 2025
Large and medium-sized Russian organizations directed a total of 4.5 trillion rubles toward innovation activities during 2025. Nearly half of the expenditure originated from the services sector, while information technology and telecommunications accounted for 860.9 billion rubles. The Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge at HSE University published the figures based on Rosstat data, showing an innovation intensity rate of 2.7 percent. Services companies alone contributed approximately 2.3 trillion rubles, including 882.7 billion rubles for research and development. Astra Group IR Director Vladislav Anshakov outlined major spending areas such as product development, cloud and AI hardware, and acquisitions of technologies and teams. The group expanded its portfolio with the Perseus DBMS and a 26 percent stake in AI developer AIB. More than one-third of organizations cited high costs and insufficient internal funds as key barriers to further innovation.
Telegram macOS Developer Says 99.9% of Client Code Is Now Written by AI and Suggests Firing Manual Coders
Mike, the developer of the official Telegram client for macOS, stated that artificial intelligence now generates 99.9 percent of the messenger's client code. He argued that programmers who continue writing code manually should be dismissed. In a Telegram discussion, Mike cited the gram.org website as an example created entirely with AI assistance in a single day, with domain support from Pavel Durov. He also described adapting the iOS client for a foldable iPhone Duo overnight using Claude. According to Mike, even designers are now contributing to client code, and 80 to 90 percent of Telegram developers share his positive view of AI tools. When participants raised questions about code quality and security, Mike replied that AI also identifies and fixes vulnerabilities, claiming the resulting code is superior to human-written equivalents. He further announced plans to open a new GitHub repository for the macOS client source code, as the previous repository had not been updated for over a year.