Habr•August 30, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Three-Phase Defense Model OGL-Mini Protects AI Agents from Prompt Injection and Modern LLM Threats

Development of applications based on large language models continues to accelerate, with AI agents, chatbots, RAG systems, and autonomous assistants becoming integral across industries. Alongside these capabilities comes a serious security challenge confirmed by current data: as of 2026, prompt injections retain the top position in OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications, while new attack types such as system prompt leakage, vector database vulnerabilities, and embedding weaknesses have been added.

Threat Landscape for AI Agents

Modern LLMs and agents built on them remain vulnerable to a wide range of attacks. Key categories from OWASP LLM Top 10 include LLM01 Prompt Injection, LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure, LLM07 System Prompt Leakage, LLM08 Vector & Embedding Weaknesses, and LLM10 Unbounded Consumption.

Real-World Attack Examples

In December 2025, researchers at Tenable demonstrated a successful attack on an AI agent built with Microsoft Copilot Studio. The agent, configured for tourist bookings with access to customer records including credit card numbers, was bypassed through prompt injection, allowing disclosure of payment data and free bookings.

In October 2025, NeuralTrust researchers found a vulnerability in OpenAI Atlas where URL-masked natural language instructions tricked the agent into executing destructive commands such as deleting files from Google Drive.

Zscaler ThreatLabz uncovered a payment scam campaign using poisoned Python documentation that contained hidden instructions forcing AI agents to initiate fraudulent Stripe payments.

In April 2025, HiddenLayer disclosed Policy Puppetry, a universal jailbreak affecting GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and LLaMA by embedding malicious instructions inside XML, JSON, and INI structures.

Checkmarx researchers demonstrated the Lies-in-the-Loop attack on Claude Code from Anthropic, achieving remote code execution by deceiving the agent during user confirmation steps.

OGL-Mini Architecture

OGL-Mini (Open Guard Layer) implements three-stage protection: heuristics for rapid pattern matching, a TF-IDF mini-classifier distilled from DeBERTa-v3-xsmall trained on 110,734 examples, and PII detection. The pipeline adds only 10–300 ms latency on standard CPUs and supports TypeScript, Python, and Go modules.

The model is available at the open-source repository and can be integrated immediately to filter inputs and outputs for AI agents.

Related articles

Habr•AI Security

Local LLMs in AppSec: What Open Tools and Models Can Handle in Application Security

The article examines how local large language models can be integrated into application security workflows without relying on cloud subscriptions. It traces the evolution from llama.cpp in 2023 through agentic frameworks like PentAGI and Strix in 2025-2026. Teams can now run models on local hardware, connect them to code analyzers such as Semgrep, and delegate specific tasks like vulnerability path reconstruction or multi-step application testing. The piece highlights practical scenarios including static code review, dynamic testing with browser and terminal agents, and security evaluation of embedded AI assistants using tools like Garak and PyRIT. It stresses the importance of task decomposition, context management, and verification of model outputs to avoid misleading results. Hardware performance, model selection, and custom agent configurations are presented as key factors for successful adoption.

安全客•AI Security

From Accessible to Controllable: Ruishu Information Launches AITM for AI Agent Lifecycle Security

As AI Agents become digital employees in enterprise R&D, office, and business workflows, organizations must now ensure they are manageable, controllable, and auditable. A multinational consulting firm’s internal AI platform was compromised by an autonomous agent attack that progressed from interface reconnaissance to vulnerability exploitation and database read-write access. Conventional scanners missed the injection points, but the agent inferred query structures from database error messages. Ruishu Information has responded with its Agent Intelligent Lifecycle Management system (AITM), which enforces security across admission, runtime, permissions, and data flows. The platform combines static scanning, behavioral analysis, semantic judgment, and sandbox execution for pre-deployment checks, followed by continuous runtime validation and LLM data-plane protection. AITM applies HMAC-SHA256 signatures, tool whitelists, PII tokenization, and four-stage Trace auditing to reduce blind spots throughout the agent lifecycle.

BoletimSec•AI Security

South Korean Hacker Uses Generative AI Framework ARTEX to Breach 90 Organizations and Steal 8.2 Million Records

Seoul Metropolitan Police arrested a 32-year-old man identified only as A for conducting a series of intrusions against approximately 90 South Korean companies and institutions between September 2025 and October 2026. The attacker, who had no formal technology education and learned hacking from publicly available online materials, previously worked in penetration testing at a security firm from 2019 to 2022. Roughly 60 of the victims were compromised using the generative AI-powered pentesting framework ARTEX, which autonomously determined attack paths after receiving only the target name. The operation resulted in the theft of 8.2 million personal records and internal documents, after which the perpetrator extorted 38 organizations for a total of 360 million won in Tether, ultimately receiving 300,000 won. Police recovered part of the stolen material and are investigating possible copies on the dark web, classifying the case as the country's first large-scale incident involving generative AI. Six additional suspects remain under investigation while the main perpetrator has been referred to prosecutors on charges of violating information and communications network laws and extortion.

Habr•AI Security

AI in Vulnerability Management: Assistant, Weapon, and Emerging Target

Artificial intelligence now plays three simultaneous roles in vulnerability management: it assists defenders with prioritization and analysis, arms attackers with faster discovery tools, and introduces entirely new classes of assets and vulnerabilities that must be managed. Mature applications include ML-driven risk scoring in platforms such as Tenable VPR, Qualys TruRisk and Rapid7 Active Risk, which cut priority lists by 40-50 percent, and Google’s Big Sleep project that discovered a real-world SQLite flaw (CVE-2025-6965) before exploitation occurred. On the offensive side, systems like XBOW completed 104 test scenarios in 28 minutes versus 40 hours for human testers, shrinking the average time-to-exploit window to negative seven days according to Mandiant M-Trends 2025. New AI-specific attack surfaces are documented in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications and the emerging MCP Top 10, covering prompt injection, tool poisoning, and command injection against Model Context Protocol servers. Real incidents already include Air Canada’s chatbot inventing a refund policy and New York City’s MyCity bot dispensing illegal advice for nearly two years. Researchers have also demonstrated sandbox escapes in coding agents from Cursor, OpenAI Codex and Claude Code through classic file-write-and-execute patterns rather than any sentient behavior.