How to Interact with AI Models Without Exposing Sensitive Data
Conversations with public AI models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and GigaChat are scanned by automated filters and may be reviewed manually by employees or contractors of the model providers. Corporate administrators and, in some cases, law-enforcement agencies can also access chat histories.
To reduce future exposure, users should first disable the option that allows the model to learn from their dialogues. In OpenAI settings this is done by turning off “Improve the model for everyone.” Google Gemini requires disabling chat history so that conversations are automatically deleted after 72 hours. Similar toggles exist for DeepSeek and Anthropic Claude, while Sber GigaChat offers no such control in its consumer interface.
Additional hygiene measures include replacing real names, phone numbers and other identifiers with placeholders such as {name} or {phone}. When large volumes of data must be processed, tools like Redacto or Гарда Маскирование can automate masking, although results still require manual verification.
Long-running chats accumulate contextual information; therefore old conversations should be deleted and new tasks started in fresh sessions. Custom GPTs or Gemini Gems can store persistent instructions so that behavior does not need to be re-explained each time.
Models downloaded from Hugging Face should be scanned for malicious payloads with utilities such as HiddenLayer Model Scanner. Prompt-injection risks can be mitigated by pasting any third-party prompt into a word processor and applying a uniform text color to reveal hidden commands.
The most private approach is to run models locally with Ollama. After installation, a small model such as llama3.2:1b can be pulled and executed entirely on the user’s hardware. Larger production models like qwen3-coder:30b require at least 40 GB of RAM. Running the service inside a Docker container further isolates it from the host system.
For hybrid use, the open-source client ChatBox can connect to both local Ollama instances and paid API endpoints such as Cloud.ru Evolution Foundation Models. Users paste their API key, select compatible models, configure embedding and reranker components for RAG, and upload documents to a knowledge base that the model consults during generation.
Related articles
Taming the LLM Dragon: Corporate AI Gateway Architecture Addresses Classic Proxy Shortcomings
Spontaneous adoption of generative AI across enterprises has created shadow AI risks, prompt leaks, and uncontrolled token consumption that standard L7 proxies cannot mitigate. Traditional solutions built on Nginx, Envoy or Kong lack the ability to inspect Server-Sent Events streams, classify sensitive content inside prompts, or enforce token-based quotas in real time. The AI Optimum platform introduces a specialized AI gateway layer that sits between internal consumers and both local inference clusters and external APIs such as GigaChat and YandexGPT. It performs inline PII masking, routes traffic according to data sensitivity, supports OpenAI-compatible endpoints, and maintains detailed audit logs required under 152-FZ. The gateway adds only tens of milliseconds of latency while enabling granular billing, context caching optimization, and protection against runaway agent loops. Subsequent articles in the series will examine real corporate AI spend and further regulatory controls.
Why We Banned Our AI Manager from Writing Code and Assigned the Task to Claude Opus
The team behind an AI-powered marketplace manager for Wildberries initially built the system using regular updates, then migrated it to an autonomous agent. After implementing multiple layers of restrictions, they ultimately removed the agent entirely and rebuilt the solution from scratch. The new architecture relies on a single tool that handles the complete Wildberries API along with internet access while respecting all platform limits. The decision to prohibit the original AI manager from generating code stemmed from concerns over reliability and security in production environments. Instead, the developers turned to Claude Opus to handle coding tasks. This case highlights practical challenges of deploying AI agents in e-commerce automation and information security contexts.
Developer Builds MCP Linter and Discovers Security Issues in Anthropic Official Servers
A developer has released mcp-linter, a lightweight security and compliance tool for the Model Context Protocol used by Anthropic's Claude ecosystem. The linter detects critical problems such as stdout pollution that breaks JSON-RPC framing, missing destructiveHint annotations that allow autonomous agents to execute dangerous actions without human confirmation, prompt injection vectors hidden inside tool descriptions, and incomplete input schemas that increase model hallucinations. When run against Anthropic's reference servers, the tool assigned low health scores to server-memory and especially server-filesystem, highlighting dozens of parameters lacking descriptions. The utility runs with zero dependencies, supports SARIF output for GitHub Security, and can generate automatic JSON patches. The project is open source under MIT license and already integrates into CI pipelines via a dedicated GitHub Action.
Pentesting AI Components: Key Vulnerabilities CISOs Must Address in RAG and AI Agents
The article examines how AI integration into corporate systems dramatically expands the attack surface beyond traditional web application testing. It details risks associated with chatbots, RAG-enabled systems that pull from internal documents, and autonomous AI agents capable of executing real actions via APIs. Yuri Grishaev, an OSCP+ certified specialist and top Standoff 365 hacker, explains how prompt injection can bypass access controls and lead to data leaks or unauthorized operations. The piece stresses that service accounts often hold broad privileges, allowing AI components to serve as indirect paths to sensitive data even when direct user access is restricted. It also covers how AI-generated output can trigger classic vulnerabilities such as XSS if not properly sanitized. Recommendations include inventorying all AI tools, enforcing least-privilege principles, and validating user permissions before any model processes or acts on retrieved content. ABP2B provides free checklists and policy templates to help organizations prepare for secure AI adoption.